Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)
Montreal, Quebec, H2L 4M1, Canada
NCT Number: NCT02769819
This study is designed to identify patients' features predictive of difficult endotracheal intubation using a flexible fiberscope.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Montreal, Quebec, H2L 4M1, Canada
Endotracheal intubation is an important act in the practice of anesthesiology. Direct laryngoscopy is the most commonly used technique to accomplish this task. Airway characteristics predicting difficult intubation with direct laryngoscopy are well defined. Physical findings, such as Mallampati classification or measurements of the thyromental distance, mouth opening, and neck extension have been validated to help anticipate difficult situations with the direct laryngoscope. When direct laryngoscopy is difficult, early conversion to an alternative technique reduces the risk of airway compromise and associated morbidity.
Many alternative intubation devices are now available, and part of the anesthesiologist's task is to select the alternative approach best suited to each patient's specific features. Despite its use for both elective and unexpectedly difficult intubation, predictive criteria for successful airway management with the flexible fiberscope have not been developed.
The purpose of this study is to identify patient morphometric or morphological characteristics, if any, that could predict difficult intubation when using the flexible fiberscope for perioperative tracheal intubation in an elective surgical population.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: Patients will be followed from induction of anesthesia until the end of intubation, an average of 10 minutes
This study will correlate patients' morphometric and morphologic characteristics with the number of attempts and time needed for intubation using a flexible fiberscope.
Time frame: Patients will be followed from induction of anesthesia until the end of intubation, an average of 10 minutes
Time frame: Patients will be followed from induction of anesthesia until the end of intubation, an average of 10 minutes
Time frame: Patients will be followed from induction of anesthesia until the end of intubation, an average of 10 minutes
To calculate the Intubation Difficulty Scale the following variables will be collected: number of attempts, number of operators, necessity to use an alternative intubation technique, glottic visualization and effort needed to obtain optimal view of the glottis, necessity of external laryngeal pressure and vocal cords position during intubation.
Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)
Other
Acronym: BFO
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06839261
Artificial Intelligence (AI), Double Lumen Tube Intubation
Ankara, Keçiören, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT03080896
Intubation; Difficult
Louisville, Kentucky, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02788253
Intubation; Difficult
Caen, France
View Trial DetailsNCT01104090
Intubation; Difficult
Houston, Texas, United States
View Trial Details