Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center
Daegu, 700-712, South Korea
NCT Number: NCT03256812
To compare the efficacy and stability of an ICT-based centralized clinical trial monitoring system against the efficacy and stability of an existing outpatient-based electrocardiogram (ECG) and Holter monitoring system for arrhythmia detection after atrial fibrillation ablation, and to test whether such continuous monitoring can better detect arrhythmia that is undetectable by existing methods and how this may affect treatment outcomes
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me20 year–80 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Daegu, 700-712, South Korea
This clinical trial is a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter study in patients who are capable of using and consent to use a smartphone-based ECG monitoring after ablation for atrial fibrillation. The patients will be randomly assigned to either the Holter monitoring or ICT-based centralized clinical trial monitoring system group in a 1:1 ratio and will undergo monitoring from immediately after the procedure to 12 months after discharge.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Continuous monitoring will begin from the time of participation in the trial in the ICT-based centralized monitoring group. 24-hr Holter monitoring will be implemented at the 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-ups in this group, as in the Holter monitoring group. If heart rate drops below 40 beats/min or increases above 120 beats/min on ECG during ICT-based ECG home monitoring, the participant will be notified first through an alarm function.
24-hr Holter monitoring will be implemented at the 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-ups
Time frame: 12 months
The difference in arrhythmia detection rate between Holter monitoring and ICT-based centralized monitoring
Time frame: 12 months
The difference in the number of hospital visits during the study period due to arrhythmia
Time frame: 12 months
The difference in the recurrence rate of atrial fibrillation or atrial tachycardia within 1 year from atrial fibrillation ablation
Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center
Other
Efficacy and Stability of an Information and Communication Technology (ICT)-Based Centralized Monitoring System for Arrhythmia Detection After Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: a Prospective, Randomized Controlled, Multicenter Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05481359
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Athens, Georgia, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03940066
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Santander, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT05351775
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Turku, Finland
View Trial DetailsNCT03549806
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Stanford, California, United States
View Trial Details