Total knee arthroplasty
Proceduresurgical procedure in which damaged parts of the knee joint are replaced with an implant.
NCT Number: NCT03111407
The purpose of this prospective study is to evaluate Zimmer® iASSIST™ with respect to radiographic, clinical and economic outcomes and compared to conventional instrumentation in primary total knee arthroplasty (NexGen or Persona knee implants).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Hospital El Angel, S.A., Málaga, Spain
The study design is a prospective, multicenter, comparative outcome study. The study requires each site to obtain IRB (Institutional Review Board) approval prior to study enrollment. All potential study subjects will be required to participate in the Informed Consent Process.
All study subjects will undergo preoperative clinical evaluations prior to their total knee arthroplasty. Investigators will collect clinical data for 12 months. Follow-up clinical visits include 3 and 12 months post-operatively.
The primary endpoint of this study is defined as component alignment as determined using long leg X-Rays. The secondary endpoint will be to evaluate the Knee Society Score, EQ-5D (EuroQol-5Dimensions) scoring system, operating room time, blood loss and complications
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
surgical procedure in which damaged parts of the knee joint are replaced with an implant.
Time frame: 1 year
Assess the differences in component alignment, measured by the mean of radiographs, between iASSIST™ and conventional instrumentation in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures.
Time frame: 1 year
Assess the differences in Knee Society Score between iASSIST™ and conventional instrumentation in primary TKA procedures. Higher (and better) score value: 100, lower value: 0.
Score 80-100 = Excellent Score 70-79 = Good Score 60-69 = Fair Score below 60 = Poor
Time frame: 1 year
Knee Society Score function asses 12 months postoperatively between iASSIST™ and conventional instrumentation in primary TKA procedures. Higher (and better) score value: 100, lower value: 0.
Score 80-100 = Excellent Score 70-79 = Good Score 60-69 = Fair Score below 60 = Poor
Time frame: 1 year
Assess the differences in EQ-5D between iASSIST™ and conventional instrumentation in primary TKA procedures at 12 months postoperatively.
Comparison of the derived EQ-5D scale and health state between the 2 groups. The EQ-5D questionnaire includes five dimensions (5D): mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression.
EQ-5D values range from -0.2 to 1 where the negative values correspond to bad health states (states worse than death), and 1.0 corresponds to perfect health.
Zimmer, GmbH
Industry
Evaluation of Zimmer® iASSIST™ vs. Conventional Instrumentation in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Radiographic, Clinical and Economic Outcomes
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03382652
Arthritis, Avascular Necrosis
Austin, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05787821
Arthritis, Arthritis, Rheumatoid
Parker, Colorado, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03372278
Arthritis, Avascular Necrosis
Sydney, Australia
View Trial DetailsNCT04301622
Arthritis, Avascular Necrosis
Saginaw, Michigan, United States
View Trial Details