Magee Womens Hospital of UPMC
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213, United States
NCT Number: NCT05906368
The purpose of this pilot trial is to examine the feasibility and ease of use of monitoring by ClearSight in laboring and delivering patients with the intent to compare time-to-treatment of hypotension between conventionally monitored patients (Group CM) and those receiving HPI (Group CM + HPI) monitoring by ClearSight, in a population of healthy laboring women who receive epidural analgesia.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
Female
Interventional
Not applicable
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213, United States
In a prospective study, we will achieve the following aims:
To determine the feasibility and ease of use of the ClearSight monitoring system in the labor-delivery room (LDR) in detecting and monitoring hypotensive events post-epidural labor analgesia placement.
To compare the Time-to-Treatment of hypotensive events between the conventionally monitored patients (Group CM) and those receiving HPI (Group CM + HPI) monitoring by ClearSight.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Continuous blood pressure monitoring for precision hypotensive event response
Blood pressure (BP) monitoring using a conventional arm cuff and inflation after epidural anesthesia as standard procedure. Standard of care blood pressure monitoring includes measurement of blood pressure at the time of epidural test dose delivery, 3-minute cycles of BP monitoring for 30 minutes after epidural placement, and then BP monitoring every 15 minutes per existing clinical standards for at least 4-hours, or until delivery.
Time frame: From epidural placement until 4-hours post-infusion start
The difference in time between diagnosis of hypotension and treatment by clinical staff between CM and HPI groups
Time frame: report at 4-hour post-infusion
Clinical nurse reports of ease of use of ClearSight device. This outcome will be measured on a Likert Scale (0-4) with the options being: 0-Completely Disagree, 1-Disagree, 2-Neither agree nor disagree, 3-Agree, 4-Completely Agree. Outcome measure will be reported as count of participant's responses per category. For this scale, the objective was to obtain agreeable response feedback (score of 3 or 4). The specific question to measure ease of use by clinical staff was: "The ClearSight blood pressure monitoring device seems easy to use."
Time frame: report at 4-hour post-infusion
Clinical nurse reports of ease of hypotension detection using ClearSight device. This outcome will be measured on a Likert Scale (0-4) with the options being: 0-Completely Disagree, 1-Disagree, 2-Neither agree nor disagree, 3-Agree, 4-Completely Agree. Outcome measure will be reported as count of participant's responses per category. For this scale, the objective was to obtain agreeable response feedback (score of 3 or 4). The specific question to measure ease of use by clinical staff was: "The ClearSight blood pressure monitoring device seems suitable."
Time frame: report at 4-hour post-infusion
Clinical nurse reports of satisfaction of use of ClearSight device. This outcome will be measured on a Likert Scale (0-4) with the options being: 0-Completely Disagree, 1-Disagree, 2-Neither agree nor disagree, 3-Agree, 4-Completely Agree. Outcome measure will be reported as count of participant's responses per category. For this scale, the objective was to obtain agreeable response feedback (score of 3 or 4). The specific question to measure ease of use by clinical staff was: "The ClearSight blood pressure monitoring device meets my approval."
Time frame: Epidural placement to 4-hours post-infusion start
Average number of minutes patients spent within hypotensive events for each group (CM and CM + HPI).
Time frame: Epidural placement to 4-hours post-infusion start
Proportion of patients by group reporting nausea within 4-hours of post-epidural placement
Time frame: Epidural placement to 4-hours post-infusion start
Proportion of patients by group reporting Vomiting within 4-hours of post-epidural placement
Time frame: Epidural placement to 4-hours post-infusion start
Average phenylephrine dose(s) given to patients in CM and CM+HPI groups
Time frame: Epidural placement to 4-hours post-infusion start
Average ephedrine dose(s) given to patients in CM and CM+HPI groups
Time frame: Epidural placement to 4-hours post-infusion start
Average volume of fluids given to patients in CM and CM+HPI groups
Time frame: Epidural placement to 4-hours post-infusion start
Total number of participants who experienced changes in fetal heart rate category (any)
Time frame: Epidural placement to 1-hour post-infusion start
Percentage of patients who experience any fetal heart rate deceleration event [Presence (Yes) or absence (No)] within 1-hour of epidural placement.
Grace Lim, MD, MS
Other
Hypotension Prediction Index to Predict Epidural-labor Analgesia Induced Hypotension -- Pilot Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05642234
Agnosia, Analgesia, Epidural
Istanbul, Fatih, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT01260051
Anesthesia, Epidural, Behavior
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04240912
Anesthesia, Epidural
Rome, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT02801409
Agnosia, Anesthesia, Epidural
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
View Trial Details