129Xe MRI
DrugEvaluation of pulmonary function
Other names: 129Xenon scintigraphy
NCT Number: NCT03417687
This study compares the equivalence of hyperpolarized 129Xe MRI as compared to 133Xe scintigraphy for the evaluation of pulmonary function in patients being evaluated for lung resection.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Duke University Hospital, Durham, North Carolina, United States
This is a multicenter, randomized, open-label, cross-over Phase 3 study evaluating hyperpolarized 129Xe gas MRI as compared to 133Xe scintigraphy for the evaluation of pulmonary function. This study will enroll subjects being evaluated for possible lung resection surgery (i.e. segmentectomy, lobectomy, or pneumonectomy). Subjects will have both a 129Xe MRI and 133Xe scintigraphy image. The vast differences in technique for obtaining hyperpolarized 129Xe MRI as compared to 133Xe scintigraphy make it impossible to blind study procedures. However, all image interpretation will be performed by personnel blinded to the subject's medical history and all study assessments.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Evaluation of pulmonary function
Other names: 129Xenon scintigraphy
Evaluation of pulmonary function
Other names: 133Xenon scintigraphy
Time frame: 48 hours
Predicted percentage of remaining pulmonary function is a pre-specified section of lung were to be removed. Investigators indicated which portions of lung were likely to be resected. Remaining percentage of pulmonary function was determined by subtracting the percentage of pulmonary function contributed by the planned zone of resection from the total pulmonary function using a standard 6-zone image analysis of the lung. The difference between predicted percentage of remaining pulmonary function was calculated by subtracting the value derived from the 133Xe scintigraphy image from the value derived from the 129Xe MRI image (e.g. 129Xe - 133Xe).
Time frame: 3 months
The difference between the scan-predicted post-operative FEV1 and the measured post-operative FEV1
Time frame: 48 hours
The fraction of total ventilation contributed by the lower left lung zone on 6-zone analysis.
Time frame: 48 hours
The fraction of total ventilation contributed by the upper left lung zone on 6-zone analysis.
Time frame: 48 hours
The fraction of total ventilation contributed by the middle left lung zone on 6-zone analysis.
Time frame: 48 hours
The fraction of total ventilation contributed by the upper right lung zone on 6-zone analysis.
Time frame: 48 hours
The fraction of total ventilation contributed by the middle right lung zone on 6-zone analysis.
Time frame: 48 hours
The fraction of total ventilation contributed by the lower right lung zone on 6-zone analysis.
Polarean, Inc.
Industry
Evaluation of Hyperpolarized 129Xe MRI as Compared to 133Xe Scintigraphy for the Assessment of Pulmonary Function in Patients Being Evaluated for Possible Lung Resection Surgery
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05126524
Pulmonary Surgical Procedures
Angers, France
View Trial DetailsNCT03418090
Pulmonary Surgical Procedures
Durham, North Carolina, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01255033
Hypoxia, Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
Suresnes, France
View Trial DetailsNCT02376218
Pulmonary Surgical Procedures
London, Ontario, Canada
View Trial Details