Brain injury due to trauma is very common; nonetheless, no pharmacological therapy is known to improve outcomes. Medications are used to treat symptoms, such as seizures and affective disorders, but are not intended to affect the fundamental problem. If HBO2, which is regularly available and relatively safe, improves outcome in brain-injured subjects by treating the underlying pathophysiology of post-concussive syndrome, this would represent a significant advance in treatment of brain injury. Hyperbaric oxygen (HBO2) has been proposed as a treatment for patients with TBI.
Hyperbaric oxygen is one of the first pharmacologic interventions being tested in this population of individuals with mild TBI and chronic post-concussive symptoms targeted to improve cognition, memory, and functional status. However, much is unknown about how to measure improvement in post-concussive symptoms after an intervention in the targeted active duty population. In preparation for a pivotal efficacy study, the objectives of this study are to characterize two candidate primary outcome tools in our intended study population, the RPQ and the NSI, in order to better estimate the sample size needed to answer the efficacy question.
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) conducted a comprehensive review of the literature, interviewed subject matter experts (SME), and conducted focus groups with SMEs to evaluate the evidence for HBO2 for patients with TBI. The AHRQ concluded that "Although they are cited frequently, the case series and time-series studies of HBO2 for TBI patients had serious flaws. There were no high-quality studies of the use of HBO2 to improve function and quality of life in patients with chronic, stable disabilities from TBI. The most important gap in the evidence is a lack of a good quality time-series study or controlled trial of the effects of HBO2 on cognition, memory, and functional status in patients with deficits due to mild chronic TBI." Similarly, the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) has not approved HBO2 therapy for the treatment of TBI as a covered condition, citing the lack of supporting evidence for clinical efficacy.
The Defense Centers of Excellence for Psychological Health and Traumatic concluded that sufficient case reports, early safety and feasibility study data, and basic scientific plausibility exist to warrant prompt experimental study of HBO2 in the care of the full spectrum of chronic TBI. This would best be accomplished in a randomized, double-blind, multi-center clinical trial.
This Phase 2 study, through specific study design, inclusion and exclusion criteria, interim and end point analyses, treatment protocols, dose-response and safety issues, evaluation methodologies, safety, and outcome measures address the need for clinical efficacy.
In preparation for the pivotal trial, the purpose of this Phase II study is to describe the magnitude of change between baseline and follow-up outcomes for a battery of neuropsychological tests within groups. A secondary objective is to explore changes across the four groups. Differences and variability of the tests will be used for determining the optimum primary endpoint(s) for the Phase III trial, as well as for refinement of sample size and power calculations for this future study. Recruitment, randomization, blinding, and study and intervention logistics and planning will also be assessed.