Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07703098

Hydrocortisone Versus Methylprednisolone for the Treatment of Glucocorticoid-Induced Adrenal Insufficiency

This study aims to compare the use of methylprednisolone and hydrocortisone as replacement therapies in patients with glucocorticoid-induced adrenal insufficiency.

The primary goal is to evaluate and compare the recovery of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

About this study

Glucocorticoids in supraphysiological doses are the most frequent cause of adrenal insufficiency due to the suppression of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis.

In cases of confirmed adrenal insufficiency, current guidelines recommend replacement therapy with physiological doses of short- and intermediate-acting glucocorticoids to prevent adrenal crises without inhibiting HPA axis recovery.

While hydrocortisone is the most commonly used short-acting glucocorticoid, methylprednisolone is widely prescribed in Slovenia.

Because methylprednisolone lacks mineralocorticoid effects, it appears to be a particularly suitable choice for patients with glucocorticoid-induced adrenal insufficiency, where mineralocorticoid secretion is not impaired.

This randomized, prospective, open-label interventional study will primarily evaluate non-inferiority regarding HPA axis recovery after 12 months, with a long-term assessment at 24 months.

Patients will undergo testing at baseline, 3, 6,12, 18, 24 months (or until HPA axis recovery), including laboratory tests, short ACTH tests, body composition measurements, and quality of life questionnaires.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age over 18 years.
  • Suspected adrenal insufficiency due to receiving supraphysiological doses of methylprednisolone for more than 4 weeks.
  • Receiving methylprednisolone 4 mg for at least the last 4 weeks.
  • Morning cortisol lower than 300 nmol/L.
  • Inadequate result of a short ACTH test performed on a physiological dose of methylprednisolone (cortisol rise after 30 min under 470 nmol/L AND after 60 min under 500 nmol/L).
  • No further indication for treating the underlying disease, and retreatment with glucocorticoids is not expected in the next 2 years.
  • Consent to participate in the research.

Exclusion criteria

  • Known organic disease of the pituitary-adrenal axis.
  • Body mass over 130 kg.
  • Advanced comorbidities.
  • Advanced heart failure (NYHA IV).
  • Chronic kidney disease IV, eGFR under 30 ml/min.
  • Liver cirrhosis.
  • Active malignant disease.
  • Immune deficiencies.
  • Planned major surgery during the study duration.
  • Receiving drugs affecting cortisol metabolism or interfering with cortisol measurements (e.g., systemic estrogens, strong inducers or inhibitors of CYP3A4).
  • Conditions affecting cortisol metabolism (pregnancy, liver disease, nephrotic syndrome).
  • Alcohol dependence syndrome (consuming more than 21 units of alcohol per week).
  • Shift (night) work.
  • Presence of comorbidities with an expected life expectancy of less than 3 years.

Treatment and study plan

Patients will receive 3 mg of methylprednisolone once daily. The dose is administered in the morning (1 ½ tablets of 2 mg Medrol after breakfast).

Drug

Patients will receive 3 mg of methylprednisolone once daily. The dose is administered in the morning (1 ½ tablets of 2 mg methylprednisolone after breakfast).

Patients will receive 15 mg of hydrocortisone daily. The dose is split into 10 mg in the morning after breakfast and 5 mg after 6-7 hours.

Drug

Patients will receive 15 mg of hydrocortisone daily. The dose is split into 10 mg in the morning after breakfast and 5 mg after 6-7 hours.

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of patients with recovery of the HPA axis.

    Time frame: 12 months

    Replacement therapy for glucocorticoid-induced adrenal insufficiency with methylprednisolone in a physiologically equivalent morning dose is being evaluated for non-inferiority compared to hydrocortisone. Methylprednisolone is considered not inferior regarding the proportion of patients with HPA axis recovery after 12 months, provided the difference between the groups does not exceed the pre-specified non-inferiority margin of 10%. Recovery of the HPA axis is assessed via a short ACTH test, defined as a cortisol rise to at least 470 nmol/L after 30 minutes or at least 500 nmol/L after 60 minutes.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Secondary Analysis: Superiority of Methylprednisolone

    Time frame: 12 months

    If the non-inferiority of methylprednisolone is confirmed, we will also evaluate the superiority of methylprednisolone as part of the secondary analyses: The proportion of patients with recovery of the HPA axis will be higher after 12 months in the group receiving methylprednisolone.

  2. Non-inferiority of Methylprednisolone at 24 Months

    Time frame: 24 months

    Methylprednisolone is not inferior to hydrocortisone in the treatment of glucocorticoid-induced adrenal insufficiency after 24 months. The difference in the proportion of patients with HPA axis recovery between the groups does not exceed the pre-specified non-inferiority margin (15%).

  3. Number of adrenal crises.

    Time frame: 24 months

  4. Time required for HPA axis recovery based on the duration of previous glucocorticoid treatment.

    Time frame: up to 24 months

  5. Predictive Value of Morning Serum Cortisol Concentration

    Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 months.

    Morning serum cortisol levels (in nmol/L) measured to evaluate their predictive value for the short ACTH test outcome.

  6. Predictive Value of Serum Dehydroepiandrosterone Sulfate (DHEA-S)

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 24 months

    Morning serum DHEA-S levels measured to evaluate their predictive value for the short ACTH test outcome.

  7. Predictive Value of Morning Salivary Cortisone

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 24 months

    Cortisone levels in morning saliva evaluated as a potential non-invasive predictor for the short ACTH test outcome

  8. Change from Baseline in Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)

    Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 months

    Long-term glycemic control assessed by measuring HbA1c levels, expressed as a percentage (%)

  9. Change from Baseline in Fasting Glucose

    Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months

    Plasma glucose concentrations are measured in mmol/L.

  10. Change from Baseline in Lipid Profile

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months

    Metabolic assessment including total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), and triglycerides, measured in mmol/L via a standard fasting blood test.

  11. Change from Baseline in Body Fat Percentage and Visceral Fat Mass

    Time frame: Baseline, 12 months and 24 months

    Body composition (total body fat percentage and visceral fat mass) measured using Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA).

  12. Change from Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD)

    Time frame: baseline, 12 and 24 months

    Bone mineral density measured using Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA).

  13. Change from Baseline in Quality of Life Assessed by the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)

    Time frame: Time Frame: Baseline, 6, 12, 24 months.

    the SF-36 is a self-administered questionnaire measuring health-related quality of life across eight domains. Scores range from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate a better health state and lower disability.

  14. Change from Baseline in Treatment Satisfaction Assessed by the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM - 1.4)

    Time frame: 3, 12 and 24 months

    The TSQM is a validated questionnaire assessing patient satisfaction with medication across domains such as effectiveness, side effects, and convenience. Scores for each domain range from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate greater satisfaction with the treatment.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Tomaž Kocjan, MD PHD

CONTACT

[email protected]

0038615223114

Živa Dolenšek, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+38615223114

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University Medical Centre Ljubljana

Other

Collaborators

  • University of Ljubljana

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2029
Study completion
2030
First posted
Jul 14, 2026
Registry last updated
Jul 14, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.