Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07612982

Hybrid vs Fluoroscopy-Guided Interlaminar Epidural Injection in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Lumbar spinal stenosis is a common degenerative condition that can cause chronic low back and leg pain, especially during walking or standing. Interlaminar epidural steroid injections are widely used to relieve pain and improve function in patients who do not respond adequately to conservative treatments.

These injections are usually performed under fluoroscopic guidance, which allows accurate needle placement but exposes patients and healthcare providers to ionizing radiation. Ultrasound guidance has emerged as an alternative technique that avoids radiation exposure; however, ultrasound alone may not always confirm correct epidural spread of the injected medication.

This prospective, randomized clinical trial aims to compare two commonly used imaging approaches for interlaminar epidural steroid injections in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: fluoroscopy-guided injection and ultrasound-guided injection with fluoroscopic confirmation (hybrid technique). The study will evaluate patient satisfaction, radiation exposure, procedure time, technical success, pain relief, and functional outcomes.

The results of this study are expected to help identify the most effective and safe imaging guidance method for interlaminar epidural steroid injections in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

40 year–75 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Marmara University Pendik Training and Research Hospital

Istanbul, Pendik, 34899, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location contact

Gamze G Güleç, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+905528671324

About this study

This prospective, randomized clinical trial will compare two imaging guidance strategies for interlaminar epidural steroid injection in adult patients diagnosed with lumbar spinal stenosis. Eligible participants will be randomly allocated into two groups: a fluoroscopy-guided interlaminar epidural steroid injection group and an ultrasound-guided interlaminar epidural steroid injection group with fluoroscopic confirmation of epidural spread (hybrid technique).

All procedures will be performed at a single tertiary care center by experienced clinicians using standardized institutional protocols. In both groups, the interlaminar epidural space will be accessed using a midline or paramedian approach, and the same corticosteroid formulation and injection volume will be administered to ensure treatment consistency.

Procedural outcomes will include total procedure time, fluoroscopy time, radiation dose parameters recorded directly from the fluoroscopy unit, and technical success defined as correct epidural space access with appropriate contrast spread. Radiation exposure will be assessed using dose metrics provided by the imaging system, allowing comparison between the two guidance techniques.

Patient-reported outcomes will be evaluated using validated pain and functional assessment tools at baseline and during routine follow-up visits according to the study protocol. Patient satisfaction will be assessed following the procedure. Adverse events related to the procedure will be documented and monitored throughout the study period.

By systematically comparing these two imaging guidance approaches under standardized clinical conditions, this study aims to clarify whether ultrasound-guided interlaminar epidural steroid injection with fluoroscopic confirmation can reduce radiation exposure while maintaining procedural efficiency, technical accuracy, and clinical effectiveness comparable to conventional fluoroscopy-guided injection.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age between 40 and 75 years
  • Diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis confirmed by clinical evaluation and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
  • Presence of neurogenic claudication symptoms for at least 3 months
  • Inadequate response to conservative treatment, including medication, physical therapy, or exercise
  • Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain score ≥ 4 at baseline
  • Ability to provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Previous lumbar spine surgery
  • Vertebral fracture, spinal malignancy, or history of significant lumbar trauma
  • Peripheral vascular claudication or clinically significant peripheral polyneuropathy
  • Epidural steroid injection within the past 6 months
  • Medical conditions severely limiting ambulation unrelated to lumbar spinal stenosis (e.g., severe cardiopulmonary disease or advanced hip/knee osteoarthritis)
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Coagulation disorders or inability to safely discontinue anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy according to guideline recommendations
  • Known allergy to local anesthetics, corticosteroids, or contrast agents
  • Active local or systemic infection
  • Body mass index (BMI) > 30 kg/m²

Treatment and study plan

Ultrasound-guided lumbar interlaminar epidural steroid injection with fluoroscopic confirmation

Procedure

Lumbar interlaminar epidural steroid injection using betamethasone (CALES) will be performed under ultrasound guidance, followed by fluoroscopic confirmation of needle position and contrast spread.

Fluoroscopy-guided lumbar interlaminar epidural steroid injection

Procedure

Lumbar interlaminar epidural steroid injection using betamethasone (CALES) will be performed according to standard clinical practice under fluoroscopic guidance, with fluoroscopic confirmation of needle position and contrast spread.

Primary outcomes

  1. Patient Satisfaction

    Time frame: Immediately after the procedure

    Patient satisfaction with the procedure was assessed using a 5-point Likert scale.

  2. Radiation Exposure

    Time frame: During the procedure

    Radiation exposure measured as air kerma (mGy) during the procedure.

  3. Procedure Time

    Time frame: During the procedure

    Procedure time defined as the duration from identification of the target interlaminar space using ultrasound or fluoroscopy to completion of the injection.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain Intensity

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 hour, and 3 weeks after the procedure

    Pain intensity assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS).

  2. Functional Status

    Time frame: Baseline and 3 weeks after the procedure

    Functional status assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI).

  3. Technical Success

    Time frame: During the procedure

    Successful completion of interlaminar epidural steroid injection with confirmed epidural spread.

  4. Number of Needle Insertions

    Time frame: During the procedure

    Number of needle insertion attempts required to complete the procedure.

  5. Fluoroscopy Time

    Time frame: During the procedure

    Total fluoroscopy time automatically recorded by the fluoroscopy unit during the procedure.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Marmara University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Comparison of Hybrid and Fluoroscopy-Guided Interlaminar Epidural Steroid Injections on Patient Satisfaction, Radiation Dose and Procedure Time in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2027
First posted
May 29, 2026
Registry last updated
May 29, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.