Hybrid Coronary Revascularization (isolated LIMA-LAD)
Proceduresternal-sparing, off-pump, isolated LIMA-LAD revascularization
Other names: Left Internal Mammary Artery (LIMA) to LAD
NCT Number: NCT03089398
The purpose of the study is to learn which treatment option is better for patients who have multi-vessel coronary artery disease (blockages in more than one vessel supplying blood to the heart muscle). The treatment options this study will compare are: (1) Hybrid Coronary Revascularization [HCR] (a combination of surgery and catheter procedures to open up clogged heart arteries) and (2) Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [PCI] (catheter procedures alone to open up clogged heart arteries). There are no new or "experimental" procedures being tested in this study: both HCR and PCI are well-established procedures and are regularly performed in patients who have coronary artery disease. But, the FDA has not approved the drug-eluting stents used in PCI for all types of coronary artery disease. We have received an Investigational Device Exemption from the FDA to use the drug-eluting stents in this trial in the same way that they are used in clinical practice. The study being proposed here will use rigorous scientific methods and should result in a very high level of certainty about which procedure is best for patients with coronary artery disease.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
The increasing prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD), advances in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and concomitant medical therapy, and the costs of revascularization have resulted in rising interest regarding the appropriate indications and alternatives for coronary revascularization.
Hybrid coronary revascularization is the intended combination of CABG and PCI. The HCR strategy combines grafting of the left anterior descending artery (LAD) coronary artery using the left internal mammary artery (LIMA) and PCI of non-LAD coronary stenoses. Essentially, stents are substituted for saphenous vein grafts (SVG) for non-LAD lesions, and the surgical LIMA to LAD bypass is performed, ideally through a limited access, minimally traumatic approach.
Unfortunately, the published data to date on HCR must be considered limited and hypothesis generating. Clinicians, payers, and patients are interested in the specific benefits of revascularization alternatives. HCR as a scientifically validated approach would have a major healthcare impact. The ability to deliver a new therapy for CAD that provides durability, but without the obligatory trauma and prolonged recovery time characteristic of conventional CABG would be a major advance in the field of cardiovascular medicine. The NHLBI-funded Hybrid Observational Study demonstrated that equipoise exists between the two coronary revascularization paradigms; however, a rigorously designed randomized clinical trial is now needed to provide sufficient evidence to guide clinical decision making for this important patient population.
This trial is a prospective, multi-center randomized comparative effectiveness trial of HCR compared to multi-vessel PCI in patients with multi-vessel CAD involving the LAD or left main (LM) territories. The trial is designed as a "large, simple" trial, and some baseline, procedure-related and short-term outcomes data collection will be extracted from existing registry data (Society of Thoracic Surgeons [STS] Data Registry). The overall objective of this trial is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Hybrid Coronary Revascularization (HCR) compared to multi-vessel PCI with drug-eluting stents (DES) in patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease involving the Left Main and/or Left Anterior Descending arteries.
The primary objective the trial is to determine whether hybrid coronary revascularization is associated with a reduction in Major Adverse Cardiac and Cerebrovascular Events (MACCE) compared to PCI with DES.
The secondary objectives are to determine the impact of HCR compared to PCI on health status and quality of life.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Note: A patient may be considered eligible for enrollment if PCI with DES in non-LM and non-LAD territory was performed within 30 days prior to randomization, as long as revascularization was successful and uncomplicated, or has been performed more than 30 days prior even if unsuccessful or complicated
sternal-sparing, off-pump, isolated LIMA-LAD revascularization
Other names: Left Internal Mammary Artery (LIMA) to LAD
percutaneous revascularization of at least one non-LAD target
Other names: PCI with metallic DES of non-LAD vessel(s)
Multi-vessel PCI with metallic drug-eluting stents (DES) including the LAD and or LM. Only FDA approved commercially available metallic drug-eluting stents may be used in this protocol.
Other names: PCI
Time frame: Up to 24 months
The current sample size of 200 patients will not provide sufficient power to test the original null hypothesis of the trial. However, it will allow for an estimate of the MACCE rate in the two groups. A 2-year follow-up will be used to capture and understand the difference in MACCE between the two procedures. This reasoning is based on the NHLBI-funded Hybrid Revascularization Observational Study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01121263), which enrolled 200 HCR and 98 multi-vessel PCI with drug-eluting stent (DES) patients, and demonstrated similar risk-adjusted MACCE rates over the first 12 months following the intervention but divergence by approximately 18 months of followup.
Therefore, it is important to continue the follow-up of the 200 randomized patients to at least 24 months. Of note, some patients who were enrolled early in the trial will have up to 3 years of follow-up data collected by the time the final patient randomized completes the 2-year time point.
Time frame: Up to 90 days post-randomization
For HCR patients, lab values are pre- and post-CABG. For PCI patients, lab values are pre- and post- the last PCI.
Time frame: Up to 90 days post-randomization
For HCR patients, lab values are pre- and post-CABG. For PCI patients, lab values are pre- and post- the last PCI.
Time frame: Up to 90 days post-randomization
For HCR patients, lab values are pre- and post-CABG. For PCI patients, lab values are pre- and post- the last PCI.
Time frame: Up to 90 days post-randomization
For HCR patients, lab values are pre- and post-CABG. For PCI patients, lab values are pre- and post- the last PCI.
Time frame: Up to 90 days post-randomization
For HCR patients, lab values are pre- and post-CABG. For PCI patients, lab values are pre- and post- the last PCI.
Time frame: 24 Hours Prior to, During, and Within 24 Hours of the Procedure
For HCR patients, medications are prior/during/after CABG. For PCI patients, medications are prior/during/after the last PCI. Number of participants requiring medications at any time 24 Hours Prior to, During, and Within 24 Hours of the Procedure. Procedures can occur up to 90 days after randomization.
Time frame: Up to 90 days post-randomization
Number of participants requiring transfusion during procedure and after procedure
Time frame: Up to 90 days post-randomization
Length of stay for all study procedures combined, beginning at date of procedure
Time frame: Up to 90 days post-randomization
Discharge disposition is for the last study procedure
Time frame: Up to 24 months
Health Status as measured by cost-effectiveness. Cost-effectiveness will be evaluated using a micro-simulation model, which will predict the accrued health care costs and quality-adjusted life expectancy for each subject at the end of the trial follow-up period and in addition over a lifetime horizon.
Time frame: Up to 24 months
For the HCR group, partial data will be extracted and transferred from the STS registry. Thus, this study will also allow evaluation of the process of data transfer, assessment of the data quality, and eventually determination of the feasibility to conduct a clinical trial with data linked to a registry.
Emilia Bagiella
Other
Randomized Trial Of Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03188705
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
Lancaster, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07468955
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
Kütahya, Center, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06029517
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
Buffalo, New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04058990
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, Japan
View Trial Details