University of Virginia Center for Diabetes Technology
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22902, United States
NCT Number: NCT04878120
The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and feasibility of a smart bolus calculator that adjusts insulin dosing for meals according to real-time insulin sensitivity (SI) in adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D) using a hybrid closed loop (HCL) system during an active week of diabetes camp.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me12 year–17 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22902, United States
This is a single center, double-blind, randomized, crossover trial. The study team will target enrollment of 30 adolescents (age 12 - <18 years) with T1D who currently manage their diabetes with an insulin pump and a continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system. Participants will be randomized 1:1 to the use of the standard HCL system (USS Virginia) vs. the HCL system with the smart bolus calculator first. The trial will be held at a local camp facility and will consist of EITHER a weeklong (6 day/5 night) camp OR two long weekends (4 day/3 night) separated by a washout period of about one week.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Standard HCL system (USS Virginia)
HCL system (USS Virginia) with smart bolus calculator informed by insulin sensitivity
Time frame: 4 hours (dinner postprandial period); the final metric for each intervention type is obtained as the average over two consecutive camp days (days 1-2 for the first intervention; days 3-4 for the second intervention)
LBGI computed from CGM collected in the four hours following the dinner meal.
LBGI is a metric quantifying the risk for hypoglycemia (the higher the LBGI, the higher the exposure to/risk of hypoglycemia), calculated based on the following two steps:
rL(i) = 10 x (1.509 x (log(CGM(i))^1.084 - 5.381))^2, if CGM(i) <=112.5 mg/dL; rL(i) = 0, if CGM(i) >112.5 mg/dL
The hypoglycemia risk score ranges from 0 for CGM readings >112.5 mg/dL (no hypoglycemia risk) to 100 for CGM readings =20 mg/dL (maximum hypoglycemia risk); consequently, LBGI can theoretically assume values between 0 and 100 as well. Clinically relevant LBGI thresholds have been defined:
Time frame: 4 hour (dinner postprandial period); average over two consecutive days for each intervention type, as described for primary outcome
Percentage of CGM readings in hypoglycemia below 70 mg/dL
Time frame: 4 hour (dinner postprandial period); average over two consecutive days for each intervention type, as described for primary outcome
Percentage of CGM readings in normoglycemia between 70-180 mg/dL
Time frame: 4 hour (dinner postprandial period); average over two consecutive days for each intervention type, as described for primary outcome
Percentage of CGM readings in hyperglycemia above 180 mg/dL
Time frame: 4 hour (dinner postprandial period); average over two consecutive days for each intervention type, as described for primary outcome
HBGI computed from CGM collected in the four hours following the dinner meal.
HBGI is a metric quantifying the risk for hyperglycemia (the higher the HBGI, the higher the exposure to/risk of hyperglycemia), calculated based on the following two steps:
rH(i) = 10 x (1.509 x (log(CGM(i))^1.084 - 5.381))^2, if CGM(i) >112.5 mg/dL; rH(i) = 0, if CGM(i) <=112.5 mg/dL
The hyperglycemia risk score ranges from 0 for CGM readings <=112.5 mg/dL (no hyperglycemia risk) to 100 for CGM readings =600 mg/dL (maximum hyperglycemia risk); consequently, HBGI can theoretically assume values between 0 and 100 as well. Clinically relevant HBGI thresholds have been defined:
Time frame: 4 hour (dinner postprandial period); average over two consecutive days for each intervention type, as described for primary outcome
CGM coefficient of variation as a measure of glucose variability
Time frame: 4 hour (dinner postprandial period); average over two consecutive days for each intervention type, as described for primary outcome
Total amount of carbohydrate administered as rescue treatments per study protocol
University of Virginia
Other
Hybrid Closed-Loop Control With Prandial Insulin Dosing Informed by Insulin Sensitivity in Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT00690066
Autoimmune Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04614168
Autoimmune Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus
Edinburgh, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT06048757
Autoimmune Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus
Pamplona, Navarre, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT01747967
Autoimmune Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus
Paris, France
View Trial Details