NCT Number: NCT07714811
Chronic tendinopathies and enthesopathies are common musculoskeletal conditions in orthopedics and sports medicine, frequently leading to pain, impaired function, and significantly reduced quality of life. Their pathogenesis involves tissue degeneration and ineffective repair response, often without an active inflammatory process.
Standard conservative management based on physiotherapy and activity modification is often prolonged and not always satisfactory. Minimally invasive injectable interventions supporting tendon and enthesis regeneration represent a promising alternative due to their favorable safety profile and outpatient feasibility.
Hyaluronic acid (HA) is a glycosaminoglycan naturally present in connective tissues. In the context of tendinopathy, it is thought to modulate inflammatory processes, provide mechanical protection by reducing friction and adhesion within the tendon sheath, and support the proper organization of collagen fibers in the tendon matrix.
Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is an autologous concentrate of platelets providing high local concentrations of growth factors, including platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), which initiate and support repair processes, cellular proliferation, and angiogenesis.
This prospective, randomized, open-label, two-arm study aims to compare the clinical efficacy of hyaluronic acid (HA) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections in 80 participants with chronic Achilles tendinopathy or medial epicondylopathy of the elbow. Participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either two HA injections or two PRP injections administered two weeks apart under ultrasonographic guidance. Follow-up will continue for 12 months after the second injection. The primary outcomes are the changes from baseline to 6 months in pain intensity measured using a 100-millimeter (mm) Visual Analog Scale (VAS), upper-limb function measured using the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaire in participants with medial epicondylopathy, and Achilles tendon symptoms and function measured using the Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment-Achilles (VISA-A) questionnaire in participants with Achilles tendinopathy. The results will provide evidence to support the selection of injectable treatment for chronic tendinopathies and enthesopathies.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Lublin, Lublin Voivodeship, 20-841, Poland
Location status: Recruiting
Beata Krupska, MSc
SUB_INVESTIGATOR
Damian Borys, MD
SUB_INVESTIGATOR
Emilia Antoniewska, MSc
SUB_INVESTIGATOR
Mateusz Matyjaszczyk, MD
SUB_INVESTIGATOR
Piotr Przybylski, MD, PhD
SUB_INVESTIGATOR
Przemysław Golonka, MD
SUB_INVESTIGATOR
Tomasz Wnuk, MD, PhD
CONTACT
Tomasz Wnuk, MD, PhD
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Assigned to: Arm 1
Assigned to: Arm 2
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months after the second injection
Pain intensity will be measured using a 100-millimeter (mm) Visual Analog Scale (VAS), ranging from 0 mm, indicating no pain, to 100 mm, indicating the worst imaginable pain. The outcome will be the mean change in VAS score from baseline to 6 months after the second injection. A decrease in score indicates improvement.
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months after the second injection
Upper-limb symptoms and function will be assessed using the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaire in participants with medial epicondylopathy. The total score ranges from 0 to 100 points, with higher scores indicating greater disability. The outcome will be the mean change from baseline to 6 months after the second injection. A decrease in score indicates improvement.
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months after the second injection
Symptoms and function associated with Achilles tendinopathy will be assessed using the Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment-Achilles (VISA-A) questionnaire in participants with Achilles tendinopathy. The total score ranges from 0 to 100 points, with higher scores indicating better function and fewer symptoms. The outcome will be the mean change from baseline to 6 months after the second injection. An increase in score indicates improvement.
Time frame: Baseline and 1, 3, and 12 months after the second injection
Pain intensity will be measured using a 100-millimeter (mm) Visual Analog Scale (VAS), ranging from 0 mm, indicating no pain, to 100 mm, indicating the worst imaginable pain. Mean changes from baseline will be assessed separately at 1, 3, and 12 months after the second injection. A decrease in score indicates improvement.
Time frame: Baseline and 1, 3, and 12 months after the second injection
Upper-limb symptoms and function will be assessed using the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaire in participants with medial epicondylopathy. The total score ranges from 0 to 100 points, with higher scores indicating greater disability. Mean changes from baseline will be assessed separately at 1, 3, and 12 months after the second injection. A decrease in score indicates improvement.
Time frame: Baseline and 1, 3, and 12 months after the second injection
Symptoms and function associated with Achilles tendinopathy will be assessed using the Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment-Achilles (VISA-A) questionnaire in participants with Achilles tendinopathy. The total score ranges from 0 to 100 points, with higher scores indicating better function and fewer symptoms. Mean changes from baseline will be assessed separately at 1, 3, and 12 months after the second injection. An increase in score indicates improvement.
Time frame: From the second injection through 12 months of follow-up
The number of days from the second injection to the first documented return to the participant's pre-injury level of physical activity without activity restrictions will be recorded. Participants who do not return to their pre-injury activity level during follow-up will be considered not to have experienced the event by the end of the 12-month follow-up period.
Time frame: From the first injection through 12 months after the second injection
The number and percentage of participants experiencing one or more adverse events (AEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), or adverse device effects (ADEs) will be reported. Events will be assessed according to their type, severity, seriousness, and relationship to the administered intervention.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Ortonika Orthopedic Medical Clinic in Lublin
Other
Comparative Analysis of the Efficacy of Hyaluronic Acid and Platelet-Rich Plasma Injections in the Treatment of Chronic Tendinopathies and Enthesopathies: A Prospective, Randomized Comparative Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06100822
Achilles Tendinopathy, Chronic Pain
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05464498
Achilles Tendinopathy, Insertional Achilles Tendinopathy
Roma, RO, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT06639308
Achilles Injuries Tendon, Achilles Tendinopathy
Asyut, Asyut Governorate, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT06025565
Arm Injuries, Elbow Injuries
Cape May, New Jersey, United States
View Trial Details