Erevna Innovations Inc.
Westmount, Quebec, H3Z 1C3, Canada
NCT Number: NCT07079397
Soft tissue filler injections continue to grow in popularity as a method of facial rejuvenation, including volume restoration and contour enhancement.
Many different hyaluronic acid (HA)-based fillers are available on the market and differ in terms of their physical and chemical properties, which results in families of fillers (e.g., Non-Animal Stabilized Hyaluronic Acid - NASHA vs. Optimal Balance Technology - OBT) with different tissue integration patterns. It has been proposed that the properties of fillers significantly influences their tendency to migrate. More specifically, thick fillers may be less prone to migration compared to fluid fillers. However, a detailed knowledge of facial anatomy, safer injection techniques, and careful product selection based on filler qualities may be preventive measures for filler migration.
The goal of this study is to describe the short and intermediate-term product distribution/integration patterns of NASHA and OBT-based fillers, and to evaluate the evidence (if any) of filler migration from the intended site of injection.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Westmount, Quebec, H3Z 1C3, Canada
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Participants will receive pan-facial treatment in at least one facial area using a Restylane NASHA product and at least one different facial area using Restylane OBT product. Participants will undergo three (3) scheduled MRI scans thoughout the duration of the study post HA injections.
Time frame: Baseline (post optimal correction), Week 12 and Week 24
High resolution MRI will determine presence of filler migration. Migration will be assessed radiologically and defined as the presence of identifiable product in anatomical regions outside the treatment area (where the product was initially placed) using a dichotomous qualitative response "yes/no".
Time frame: Baseline (post optimal correction), Week 12 and Week 24
Physician evaluation will determine the distribution/integration patterns of NASHA and OBT-based fillers through palpable assessment in whcih the physician will use a binary "yes" or "no" responde to denote filler migration from the area of original placemement.
Time frame: Baseline (post optimal correction), Week 12 and Week 24
Ultrasound evaluation will determine the distribution/integration patterns of NASHA and OBT-based fillers through visual changes to position of filler deposition.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
Adverse events (safety) realted to pan-facial injections using NASHA and OBT based products will be determined by the frequency and severity of Adverse Events (AEs):
Erevna Innovations Inc.
Other
The Integration Pattern of Non-Animal Stabilized Hyaluronic Acid (NASHA)- and Optimum Balance Technology (OBT)-Based Fillers: An Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07193199
Aesthetic
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT07063511
Aesthetic
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT07205744
Aesthetic, Biostimulator
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT07210190
Aesthetic
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
View Trial Details