Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT07450768

How Personality Type Affects Pain and the Need for General Anesthesia in Patients Receiving an Arm Nerve Block for Wrist Fracture Surgery

This study looked at whether a person's emotional personality type affects how they experience pain and how well a regional anesthesia technique works during arm surgery.

We studied patients who underwent wrist or upper arm surgery using an axillary nerve block (a type of regional anesthesia that numbs the arm). Before surgery, patients completed a questionnaire measuring their emotional temperament, including anxious, depressive, cyclothymic, irritable, and other personality traits.

We found that patients with an anxious personality type were more likely to need conversion to general anesthesia during surgery. They also reported higher pain scores after surgery. Patients with depressive traits also experienced higher pain levels. In contrast, some other temperament types reported lower pain levels.

These findings suggest that emotional characteristics may influence how patients respond to anesthesia and pain after surgery. Understanding a patient's temperament before surgery may help doctors better plan anesthesia, provide additional support when needed, and improve overall comfort and safety.

This research supports a more personalized approach to anesthesia care, taking into account not only physical health but also psychological factors.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Ahi Evran University

Kırşehir, 40100, Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

This prospective observational study evaluates the association between affective temperament profiles and perioperative anesthetic outcomes in adult patients undergoing elective upper extremity surgery under ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block.

Affective temperament was assessed preoperatively using the validated TEMPS-A (Temperament Evaluation of Memphis, Pisa, Paris, and San Diego - Autoquestionnaire). Based on established scoring methodology, participants were categorized into depressive, anxious, cyclothymic, hyperthymic, irritable, or non-dominant temperament types. The instrument is grounded in Akiskal's affective temperament model, which conceptualizes temperament as a stable trait influencing stress reactivity, emotional processing, and physiological responses.

All patients received a standardized anesthetic protocol. Ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block was performed with identification of the radial, median, ulnar, and musculocutaneous nerves. A total of 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine was administered. Intravenous fentanyl (50 µg) was given prior to block placement. Intraoperative discomfort was managed with supplemental sedation. Conversion to general anesthesia was performed when regional anesthesia alone was insufficient to maintain surgical conditions. Block failure was defined as inability to complete the procedure using the regional technique alone.

Hemodynamic parameters (systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, and heart rate) were recorded at baseline and at 5-minute intervals during surgery. Postoperative pain intensity was measured using the Visual Analog Scale at predefined perioperative time points.

Statistical analyses included correlation testing and multivariable modeling. LASSO regression was applied for variable selection and identification of predictors of increased postoperative pain scores. Ridge logistic regression was used to determine independent predictors of anesthesia escalation, accounting for multicollinearity among baseline hemodynamic variables and temperament types.

This study explores whether stable affective traits influence regional anesthesia adequacy, intraoperative physiological responses, and postoperative pain perception, with the aim of informing individualized perioperative management strategies.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age between 18 and 65 years
  • Scheduled for elective upper extremity surgery requiring axillary brachial plexus block
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III
  • Ability to understand and complete the TEMPS-A questionnaire
  • Provision of written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Refusal to participate
  • Contraindication to regional anesthesia (e.g., local infection at injection site, coagulopathy)
  • Known allergy to local anesthetics (bupivacaine)
  • Cognitive impairment or inability to complete the temperament questionnaire
  • Severe psychiatric disorder requiring active treatment
  • Incomplete perioperative data or missing VAS assessments

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Anesthesia Escalation (Sedation and/or General Anesthesia)

    Time frame: Intraoperative period (from block performance until completion of surgery)

    Proportion of patients who required escalation beyond axillary brachial plexus block, defined as the need for additional intravenous sedation and/or conversion to general anesthesia due to inadequate surgical anesthesia or patient discomfort.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Postoperative Pain Intensity (VAS Score)

    Time frame: Preoperative baseline, postoperative 3rd hour, 12th hour, and 24th hour

    Pain intensity measured using the Visual Analog Scale (0-10), where 0 represents no pain and 10 represents worst imaginable pain.

  2. Predictors of Anesthesia Escalation

    Time frame: Intraoperative period

    Identification of independent predictors of conversion to general anesthesia using Ridge logistic regression analysis.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Kirsehir Ahi Evran Universitesi

Other

Registry information

Official study title

The Effect of Affective Temperament on Block Success and Hemodynamics in Patients Undergoing Axillary Plexus Block for Distal Radius Fracture: A Prospective Observational Study.

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2024
First posted
Mar 5, 2026
Registry last updated
Mar 5, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.