Compton Hospice
Wolverhampton, WV3 9DH, United Kingdom
NCT Number: NCT03195725
To investigate how discussions surrounding Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (DNACPR) decisions have changed following the Tracey judgement and how "harm" is being defined by clinicians working within specialist palliative care in a hospice setting.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeAll sexes
Observational
Wolverhampton, WV3 9DH, United Kingdom
This is a retrospective case note review. Five hospices within the West Midlands will be invited to participate and up to 300 sets of deceased patients' notes containing a DNACPR form will be reviewed; 150 from 2013 (prior to the Tracey judgement) and 150 from 2015 (following the Tracey judgement).
Initially these forms will be reviewed to document the percentage of patients with whom a DNACPR decision was discussed in 2013 and the percentage with whom it was discussed in 2015 to allow comparison from before the Tracey judgement and after the Tracey judgement.
If patients did NOT have DNACPR decisions discussed with them, their DNACPR forms and clinical notes will then be reviewed and the reasons documented for not involving patients in 2013 and in 2015 compared. It is anticipated that many, if not most, DNACPR decisions which were not discussed with patients in 2013 will cite "distress" as the reason but following the Tracey judgement this would not be acceptable in 2015.
Further analysis of DNACPR forms and clinical notes will then take place for those patients identified as not being involved in DNACPR discussions in 2015 (post-Tracey) to identify whether, and how, "harm" was defined by the clinician. This should be recorded on the DNACPR form or in the clinical notes.
Following data collection, quantitative analysis will be undertaken to allow comparison of percentages of DNACPR decisions discussed with patients in 2013 and 2015 followed by descriptive analysis of variation in reasons for not discussing DNACPR decisions in 2013 and 2015. This study is explorative in nature and further qualitative analysis will not be part of this research project.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
No intervention will occur
Time frame: 1 year
Time frame: 1 year
Time frame: 1 year
The documentation of the concept of 'harm' in DNACPR decisions not discussed with patients in 2015
The Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust
Other Gov
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03817892
Cardiac Arrest, Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Caen, Normandy, France
View Trial DetailsNCT07567638
Adherence Interventions, Airway Obstruction
Santander, Cantabria, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT06599073
Cardiac Arrest (CA), Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Loerenskog, Akershus, Norway
View Trial DetailsNCT06565767
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, Educational Problems
São Paulo, Brazil
View Trial Details