Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06299501

How Can Child Health Services Identify and Respond to Family Violence

Family violence has severe impacts on children's health and development. The Child Health Services (CHS) in Sweden reaches almost 100% of families with young children and provides a unique setting to facilitate identification of family violence. This study is a three-armed randomized controlled trial (RCT) conducted to assess the effectiveness of different approaches to identify family violence within CHS. Two different approaches are tested and compared to treatment as usual; 1) information about family violence at home visit when child is newborn, and questions posed to all mothers at the 6-8-week visit; 2) information about family violence at home visit when child is newborn, and questions posed to mothers on evidence based indication. Nurses who are randomized into any of the two intervention arms receive training and supervision. The outcomes of the study are related to knowledge, attitudes, and practices around identification and support in case of family violence and number of identified cases of family violence.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Family Violence Domestic Violence Intimate-partner Violence

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Central Child Health Care (Centrala barnhälsovården)

Stockholm, Sweden

About this study

Family violence has severe impacts on children's health and development. Early identification of family violence is imperative to facilitate timely interventions. In Sweden, the Child Health Services (CHS) has a main aim to promote children's health and development and prevent ill health. The Swedish CHS program reaches almost 100% of families and includes 18 scheduled visits characterized by a health-promoting approach focusing on the child and the parents' wellbeing. The CHS offers a unique setting to identify family violence among families with young children. However, there is a paucity of knowledge on how questions about family violence should be addressed within CHS. The aim of the study is to increase knowledge of the effectiveness of an evidence-based program within the Swedish CHS to identify family violence. The specific research question is: How can practice within CHS contribute to identification of family violence on routine or indication compared to treatment as usual?

A three-armed pragmatic randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted in 2017-2019 where all CHS's (n=120) in Region Stockholm were invited to participate. A total of 85 nurses from 22 CHC's participated in the trial of which 32 nurses from 10 CHS's were assigned the routine arm, 25 nurses from 5 CHS's were assigned the evidence based indication arm and 28 nurses from 7 CHS's were assigned to the treatment as usual group. Randomization was performed on CHS level so that the same approach was followed at each CHS when the first nurse was randomized. Only nurses in the routine and indication groups received training and supervision. The group that was assigned treatment as usual was offered the same training after the study was completed. The nurses completed questionnaires on the outcome knowledge, attitudes, and practices to identify and deal with family violence at three time points. Nurses in the two intervention groups also documented their practices and any identified cases of family violence during the intervention.

The findings of the study can contribute to knowledge on how children exposed to family violence can be identified and adequate measures be put in place.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Registered nurse
  • Working in any of the Child Health Services in the Stockholm Region

Exclusion criteria

  • None

Treatment and study plan

Routine questions

Procedure

The routine group of nurses receive training and supervision and will ask questions about family violence to everyone, disregarding if they suspect family violence or not.

Questions on evidence based indication

Procedure

The group of nurses will receive training and supervision and will ask questions on evidence based indication

Treatment as usual

Procedure

The group of nurses will ask questions when suspecting ongoing violence in the family

Primary outcomes

  1. Knowledge, attitudes and practices

    Time frame: Measured before randomization, within two weeks after training and six months post-training.

    An adaptation of the "Physician Readiness to Manage Violence Survey" developed by Short LM et al. (Am J Prev Med 2006; 30(2):173-180) and Ramsay J et al. (Brit J Gen Pract 2012; 62(602):647-655) was used. Higher values indicate more positive outcomes.

    A subscale was used to measure knowledge about definition, prevalence and consequences of family violence (FV), summarized into a total value, with higher values indicating higher knowledge. Additional questions concerned knowledge of guidelines, reporting to social services and local interventions for children and parents.

    Nurse's attitudes by asking about informing, asking questions about and acting upon FV.

    Practices were measured by questions about how nurses provided or displayed information material, asked about FV and their reports of concern to social services.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of cases of family violence

    Time frame: Documentation covers the intervention phase (6 months)

    Documentation from nurses in the two intervention arms on number of identified cases of family violence

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Karolinska Institutet

Other

Collaborators

  • Jane and Dan Olsson Foundation for Scientific Purposes
  • Region Stockholm

Registry information

Official study title

How Can Child Health Services Identify and Respond to Family Violence - a Randomized Controlled Trial to Assess the Effectiveness of Routine Questions or Questions Posed on Indication Compared to Treatment as Usual

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2019
Study completion
2019
First posted
Mar 7, 2024
Registry last updated
Mar 8, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.