Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07002411

Hospitality Oriented Service Perception Evolution With Robots (HOSPER)

The HOSPER project aims to determine if using Pepper and NAO social robots at the IRCCS INRCA in Ancona's (Italy) entrance is a viable way to improve the current reception and guidance services for hospital visitors. The robots will offer proactive assistance and directions to departments.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

65 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

IRCCS INRCA Hospital

Ancona, 60127, Italy

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Elvira Maranesi, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

Letizia Ferrara, MD

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

About this study

The primary aim of the "HOSPER" project is to assess the feasibility of an innovative reception and proactive guidance service designed to enhance the quality of the existing service provided by the IRCCS INRCA in Ancona (Italy). This will be achieved through the deployment of two social robots, Pepper and NAO, located at the hospital entrance to provide information to users inquiring about directions to specific departments. Furthermore, the study will evaluate the level of participant satisfaction with their interactions with the robots.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Possession of full cognitive capacity;

Exclusion criteria

  • • Lack of written informed consent

Treatment and study plan

Innovative hospital reception service with social robot NAO

Other

The robot NAO welcomes the user and asks how it can assist them. At this point, the user responds, and the robot, in turn, replies in two possible ways: If it has not understood the request, it prompts the user to rephrase it, and the process returns to the previous point. If it has understood the request, it explains the route the user needs to follow. Once the interaction has been successful or two consecutive attempts have failed, the robot asks the user if the necessary information has been provided. If yes, the robot dismisses the user. If no, the interaction resumes from the point where the robot asks for the department to reach or the exam to take.

Innovative hospital reception service with social robot PEPPER

Other

The robot PEPPER welcomes the user and asks how it can assist them, stating the following phrase: "Good morning and welcome to INRCA. I am PEPPER and I am here to provide directions to help you reach your desired location within the hospital. Which department do you need to reach or which exam do you need to take? " At this point, the user responds, and the robot, in turn, replies in two possible ways: If it has not understood the request, it prompts the user to rephrase it, and the process returns to the previous point. If it has understood the request, it explains the route the user needs to follow. Once the interaction has been successful or two consecutive attempts have failed, the robot asks the user if the necessary information has been provided. If yes, the robot dismisses the user as follows: "Thank you for your participation. Have a good day." If no, the interaction resumes from the point where the robot asks for the department to reach or the exam to take.

Primary outcomes

  1. perceived quality of the innovative reception service

    Time frame: immediately after the intervention

    The perceived quality will be evaluated by an ad hoc Customer Satisfaction questionnaire. The definition of this indicator is evaluated by quantifying several variables, including: the attention received from the robot in terms of accuracy of the interaction and courtesy (score from 1 - not at all satisfied - to 7 - very satisfied), the clarity and completeness of the information received (score from 1 - not at all satisfied - to 7 - very satisfied), the respect for personal privacy (score from 1 - not at all satisfied - to 7 - very satisfied), the overall satisfaction with the service provided (score from 1 - not at all satisfied - to 7 - very satisfied), and whether the service would be recommended to others (score from 1 - absolutely not - to 7 - definitely yes).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Usability

    Time frame: immediately after the intervention

    The usability will be evaluated by the System Usability Scale (SUS). It consists of a 10-item questionnaire with five response options for respondents, ranging from "Strongly Agree" to "Strongly Disagree." The score for the System Usability Scale (SUS) is calculated by following these steps:

    • For odd-numbered questions (1, 3, 5, 7, 9), subtract 1 from the user's rating.
    • For even-numbered questions (2, 4, 6, 8, 10), subtract the user's rating from 5.
    • Add the new values for all 10 questions.
    • Multiply this sum by 2.5. This final number gives you a score out of 100.

    The System Usability Scale (SUS) score, ranging from 0 to 100, is interpreted to indicate the perceived usability of a system. Higher scores suggest better usability.

    Interpreting SUS Scores:

    90-100: exceptionally good usability. 80-89: very good usability 70-79: good usability 60-69: the usability is marginal 50-59: Poor usability 0-49: Extremely poor usability

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Anna Rita Bonfigli

CONTACT

[email protected]

0718003719

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Istituto Nazionale di Ricovero e Cura per Anziani

Other

Registry information

Acronym: HOSPER

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Jun 3, 2025
Registry last updated
Jun 3, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.