Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07576777

Hormonal and Microbiota Modulation After Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty

Obesity is a chronic disease with a rapidly increasing prevalence, expected to affect up to 25% of the French population by 2030, and is associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and healthcare burden. Bariatric surgery, including sleeve gastrectomy and gastric bypass, remains the standard treatment for severe obesity but is irreversible and carries procedural risks.

Less invasive alternatives have emerged, including pharmacological treatments (GLP-1 receptor agonists and multi-agonists) and endoscopic approaches such as endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG), which have shown efficacy in weight loss and metabolic improvement, although drug therapies are limited by weight regain after discontinuation.

Sleeve gastrectomy, the most frequently performed bariatric procedure in France, induces weight loss through gastric restriction and hormonal changes, including decreased ghrelin and increased GLP-1 and PYY, along with accelerated gastric emptying.

ESG is a minimally invasive endoscopic technique with mechanisms that remain incompletely understood, likely involving gastric restriction, altered gastric emptying, and hormonal and microbiome-related effects.

Bariatric outcomes are driven by complex interactions between gastric anatomy, motility, hormonal regulation, and the gut microbiome. An integrated evaluation of these parameters is needed to better understand response variability after intervention.

A total of 40 patients will be enrolled (20 per group).

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Bichat hospital

Paris, 75018, France

About this study

Obesity is a chronic disease with increasing prevalence, projected to affect up to 25% of the French population by 2030, and is associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and healthcare burden. Bariatric surgery, including sleeve gastrectomy and gastric bypass, remains the reference treatment for severe obesity but is irreversible and associated with procedural risks.

Less invasive alternatives have emerged, including pharmacological treatments (GLP-1 receptor agonists and multi-agonists) and endoscopic procedures such as endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG). These approaches have demonstrated efficacy in weight loss and metabolic improvement, although pharmacological treatments are limited by weight regain after discontinuation and reduced long-term adherence.

Sleeve gastrectomy, the most commonly performed bariatric procedure in France, induces weight loss through gastric restriction, hormonal changes (including reduced ghrelin and increased GLP-1 and PYY), and accelerated gastric emptying. In contrast, ESG is a minimally invasive endoscopic technique with mechanisms that remain incompletely understood, with emerging data suggesting delayed gastric emptying.

Beyond mechanical restriction, the metabolic effects of bariatric interventions involve complex interactions between gastric anatomy, motility, gut hormones, and the microbiome. Gastric emptying, a key determinant of satiety and hormonal response, differs between procedures and may contribute to variability in weight loss outcomes. Hormonal adaptations and microbiome changes after ESG remain insufficiently characterized.

This study adopts an integrative approach combining gastric volumetry, gastric emptying assessment, hormonal profiling, and microbiome analysis to better understand mechanisms of response and inter-individual variability after bariatric interventions.

A total of 40 patients will be enrolled (20 per group), with treatment allocation determined by a multidisciplinary team. Participants will undergo serial assessments including blood sampling, standardized meal test hormone measurements, CT-based gastric volumetry, and gastric emptying scintigraphy. Endoscopic biopsies will be performed at 12 months in the ESG group, while gastroscopy in the surgical group will be performed only if clinically indicated.

The study aims to improve mechanistic understanding of bariatric interventions, identify predictors of response, and support personalized therapeutic strategies in obesity management.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female, age ≥ 18 years
  • BMI between 30 and 40 kg/m²
  • With or without obesity-related comorbidities (hypertension, diabetes, -obstructive sleep apnea, etc.)
  • Indication for ESG (Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty) or surgical sleeve gastrectomy validated in a multidisciplinary team meeting
  • Patient with an indication to undergo CT scan and scintigraphy
  • Written informed consent
  • Affiliation with a health insurance system

Exclusion criteria

  • Patient receiving anti-obesity treatment (GLP-1 analogs, multi-agonists)
  • History of prior gastric surgery
  • History of gastric or distal esophageal cancer
  • History of gastric dysplasia
  • Presence of a hiatal hernia > 2 cm
  • Contraindication to general anesthesia, including:
  • Severe coagulation disorders, including uncontrolled congenital or acquired hemostasis disorders, severe thrombocytopenia (platelets < 50 G/L), non-interruptible anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy according to current guidelines, uncorrected INR > 1.5
  • Hemodynamic instability, defined as persistent hypotension or shock, uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmias, or need for vasopressor support
  • Decompensated cardiac disease, including uncontrolled heart failure (NYHA III-IV), unstable ischemic heart disease or recent acute coronary syndrome, untreated severe valvular disease, uncontrolled severe hypertension
  • Decompensated respiratory disease, including acute or severe chronic respiratory failure not stabilized, uncontrolled severe COPD, untreated severe obstructive sleep apnea, persistent hypoxemia requiring high-flow oxygen therapy
  • Any other clinical condition considered incompatible with general anesthesia or endoscopy by the anesthesiologist or investigator, according to current guidelines and patient safety considerations Significant or unstable renal insufficiency, or history of severe reaction to iodinated contrast agents
  • Participation in another clinical research study, except for non-interventional studies
  • Patient under legal protection (guardianship, curatorship, or judicial protection)
  • Physical inability to provide written informed consent
  • Rare forms of obesity of genetic and/or central origin (e.g., associated with craniopharyngioma)
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • State medical aid (AME)

Treatment and study plan

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy

Procedure

Participants undergo laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with 12-month follow-up including clinical, metabolic, imaging, hormonal and microbiota assessments.

Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty

Procedure

Participants undergo endoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with 12-month follow-up including clinical, metabolic, imaging, hormonal and microbiota assessments.

Primary outcomes

  1. Gastric emptying evolution after endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty versus surgical sleeve

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 months post-intervention

    Assessment of gastric emptying using scintigraphic measurement to compare physiological changes induced by endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty versus surgical sleeve.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Gastric microbiota diversity assessed by 16S rRNA sequencing

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 months

    Gastric microbiota diversity assessed from gastric biopsies using 16S rRNA gene sequencing and expressed using the Shannon diversity index.

  2. Total Body Weight Loss (TBWL)

    Time frame: Baseline, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months

    Total Body Weight Loss expressed as percentage (%) of initial body weight.

  3. Postprandial GLP-1 plasma concentration after standardized meal test

    Time frame: Baseline, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months

    GLP-1 plasma concentrations measured at T0, T30, T90 and T180 following a standardized meal test. Results expressed in pmol/L.

  4. Correlation between gastric emptying and GLP-1 plasma levels

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 months

    Correlation between gastric emptying assessed by scintigraphy (gastric half-emptying time in minutes) and GLP-1 plasma concentrations measured after a standardized meal test.

  5. Correlation between gastric emptying and PYY plasma levels

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 months

    Correlation between gastric emptying assessed by scintigraphy (gastric half-emptying time in minutes) and PYY plasma concentrations measured after a standardized meal test.

  6. Correlation between gastric emptying and GIP plasma levels

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 months

    Correlation between gastric emptying assessed by scintigraphy (gastric half-emptying time in minutes) and GIP plasma concentrations measured after a standardized meal test.

  7. Correlation between gastric emptying and ghrelin plasma levels

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 months

    Correlation between gastric emptying assessed by scintigraphy (gastric half-emptying time in minutes) and ghrelin plasma concentrations measured after a standardized meal test

  8. Gastric volume assessed by CT-based volumetry

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month and 12 months

    Measurement of gastric volume using CT scan (gastroscanner) with volumetric reconstruction. Results expressed in milliliters (mL).

  9. Effect of gastric emptying time on total body weight loss

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 months

    Total body weight loss (%), analyzed according to gastric half-emptying time (minutes) assessed by gastric scintigraphy using linear regression.

  10. Effect of postprandial GLP-1 plasma concentration on total body weight loss

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 months

    Total body weight loss (%), analyzed according to plasma GLP-1 concentration (pmol/L) measured after a standardized meal test using biochemical assay and linear regression.

  11. Effect of gastric volume on total body weight loss

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 months

    Total body weight loss (%), analyzed according to gastric volume (mL) measured by computed tomography (CT scan) using linear regression.

  12. Effect of gastric microbiota diversity on total body weight loss

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 months

    Total body weight loss (%), analyzed according to gastric microbiota diversity assessed using the Shannon diversity index derived from 16S rRNA gene sequencing using linear regression.

  13. Safety and tolerability of endosleeve versus surgical sleeve

    Time frame: From intervention to 12 months

    Incidence of adverse events including digestive, hemorrhagic, infectious, anesthetic and nutritional complications, rehospitalization and mortality.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Maxime AMOYEL, DM

CONTACT

[email protected]

01 40 25 76 52

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Roles of Hormonal Modulation and the Microbiota in Gastric Emptying and Metabolic Response After Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty

Acronym: HOVIGAMI-ESG

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2028
Study completion
2029
First posted
May 8, 2026
Registry last updated
May 8, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.