Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02658604

Home Medication Reviews by Pharmacists in Ontario, Canada

RATIONALE:

Several examples in the literature describe the types of medication management issues uncovered during the course of home-based medication reviews. For example, the investigators previously reported the outcomes of home medication reviews of 43 homebound community pharmacy patients, finding that 58% of patients were keeping medications in the home that were expired, duplicates of other current medications, or no longer therapeutically appropriate.

Many of these issues, due to their nature, could be considered to be "hidden", i.e. issues that are unlikely to be adequately detected or resolved during the course of routine interactions between patients and pharmacists in the community pharmacy setting. Currently, only homebound patients in Ontario are eligible to receive government-funded home medication review services from pharmacists. This limitation in funding eligibility is problematic as it reduces the likelihood that non-homebound patients will receive home medication reviews, even though this population may also benefit from these services. Indeed, evidence in the literature is not limited exclusively to homebound patients, and suggests that non-homebound patients are also at risk from home-centered medication management issues and may also benefit from home medication reviews.

PURPOSE:

Our study aims to characterize the prevalence and nature of "hidden in the home" medication management issues in non-homebound patients. To our knowledge, this study would be the first of its kind to focus specifically on this patient population and lend direct evidence in support of expanding funding of home medication review services in Ontario to include non-homebound patients.

HYPOTHESIS:

A subset of ambulatory, non-homebound patients who regularly attend community pharmacies are affected by medication management issues that cannot be adequately identified and resolved during the course of a typical medication review taking place within the pharmacy. These patients would benefit from a full medication review taking place in their own homes, similar to what is presently provided under Ontario's MedsCheck at Home program, for which only homebound patients in Ontario are eligible.

RESEARCH QUESTIONS/OBJECTIVES:

1. What is the frequency of, and what type(s) and severity of, drug-related problems are detected during pharmacist visits to patients' homes who would not otherwise qualify for a MedsCheck at Home service? 2. Based on the findings from this study, which criteria would best assist community pharmacists in identifying ambulatory patients who may stand to benefit most from a home-based medication review?

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

65 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Shoppers Drug Mart #500

Toronto, Ontario, M4C1H6, Canada

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 65 or older
  • On 5 or more chronic prescription medications
  • Score of 3/8 or higher on screening questionnaire
  • Live at home and are ambulatory
  • Willingness to have a pharmacist conduct a medication review in their home

Exclusion criteria

  • Unable to converse with the pharmacist in a language they both can communicate in

Treatment and study plan

Home medication review by a pharmacist

Other

Patients will receive a home visit from a pharmacist, including a medication review and the identification and addressing of drug therapy problems through patient education, the provision of pharmacologic and/or non-pharmacologic advice, or the adaptation of therapy or communication of recommendations to prescribers. All activities are within the current scope of practice for pharmacists in Ontario. A detailed assessment of the patient's medication inventory and organization/storage practices will be conducted, followed by a medication cabinet cleanup to help the patient organize their medications and discard any expired or discontinued medications. A list of inappropriate medications found in the home will be documented, detailing the reasons why they are inappropriate and if/how the patient is currently using these medications. With patient consent, inappropriate medications will be removed from the home and returned to the pharmacy for safe disposal.

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean number of drug therapy problems (DTP) identified per patient

    Time frame: At time of home visit (cross-section), up to 6 months

    DTP definitions based on those of Hepler and Strand (1990)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Frequency distribution of drug therapy problem (DTP) type(s) across patient population

    Time frame: At time of home visit (cross-section), up to 6 months

    DTP definitions based on those of Hepler and Strand (1990)

Other outcomes

  1. Mean number of high-risk medications used per patient

    Time frame: At time of home visit (cross-section), up to 6 months

    High-risk medications are those defined by the Beers' Criteria

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Waterloo

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Home Medication Review Services for Non-homebound Community Pharmacy Patients: Evaluation of Medication Management Issues in Non-homebound Patients and Characterization of Ideal Target Population for Home-based Medication Reviews.

Important dates

Study start
2016
Primary completion
2017
Study completion
2017
First posted
Jan 20, 2016
Registry last updated
Apr 20, 2017

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.