Mayo Clinic in Rochester
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States
NCT Number: NCT05130034
The purpose of this study is to gather information on the effectiveness of a home-based pulmonary rehabilitation program with health coaching and tele-monitoring for improving patient-reported respiratory-related quality of life and physical activity in patients with fibrotic Interstitial Lung Diseases (f-ILD).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–95 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States
The home-based pulmonary rehabilitation program involves using a computer tablet paired with a pulse oximeter and activity tracker. Gentle upper body exercises, walking and a breathing practice are completed by following along on the computer tablet. Weekly check-in calls by telephone will be provided by a Health Coach to assess clinical status and monitor progress. The exercise portion of the program lasts 12 weeks. There are questionnaires and a research grade activity tracker measuring baseline and post-intervention findings at the end of 12-week period.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Home-based tablet-assisted pulmonary rehabilitation with monitoring technology and telephonic health coach calls using motivational interviewing techniques
Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks
Measured using the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ) survey which is a validated tool for measuring health status in patients with chronic lung disease divided into four domains of dyspnea, fatigue, emotion, and mastery. The Physical Summary score combines dyspnea and fatigue dimensions, a lower score suggests a greater degree of dysfunction on a 7-point scale. A difference of 0.5 in any domain is considered clinically significant (the minimal clinically important difference (MCID)). Higher total scores represent relatively better or improved patient-reported quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks
Measured using the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ) survey which is a validated tool for measuring health status in patients with chronic lung disease divided into four domains of dyspnea, fatigue, emotion, and mastery. The emotional domain score is measured by a lower score suggests a greater degree of dysfunction on a 7-point scale. A difference of 0.5 in any domain is considered clinically significant (the minimal clinically important difference (MCID)). Higher total scores represent relatively better or improved patient-reported quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks
Measured by mean number of steps per 24-hour period as assessed by Actigraphy, pre- and post-intervention
Time frame: 12 weeks
Measured at the end of study through qualitative interviews using structured interview guide, combined with primary outcomes using mixed-methods analysis. Potential themes of relevance being sought include changes in patient perception of disease severity, overcoming emotional and physical burden of disease, and feasibility and long-term utility of the intervention.
Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks
Pre and post-intervention assessment of patient-reported side-effect severity from medical management
Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks
Assessed pre and post-intervention using SMAS-30, a validated questionnaire highlighting six core self-management abilities including taking initiative, investment behavior, variety, multi-functionality, self-efficacy, and positive frame of mind. Higher total or domain scores suggest higher relative self-management ability.
Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks
Assessed pre and post-intervention using Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS), a 20-item scale measures the positive and negative affective components of well-being. A ratio of 2.5 or higher for positive vs negative assessments suggests more positive mood.
Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks
Assessed pre and post-intervention using Modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) scale; a change in 1 point is the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), with HIGHER scores suggesting greater dyspnea.
Mayo Clinic
Other
Home-based Pulmonary Rehabilitation and Health Coaching to Improve Respiratory-related Quality of Life and Physical Activity in Fibrotic Interstitial Lung Disease
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03800914
Fibrotic Interstitial Lung Disease
Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
View Trial DetailsNCT03737409
Fibrotic Interstitial Lung Disease
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
View Trial DetailsNCT06053164
Fibrotic Interstitial Lung Disease, Lung Diseases
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT07482917
Fibrosis, Fibrotic Interstitial Lung Disease
Granollers, Barcelona, Spain
View Trial Details