Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03500172

HIV Treatment Retention Interventions for Women Living With HIV (Siyaphambili Study)

The Siyaphambili Study is a sequential multistage adaptive randomized trial (SMART) to compare the effectiveness and durability of two behavioral interventions on the HIV-1 virologic response among female sex workers (FSW) living with HIV in Durban, South Africa. The interventions are: 1) nurse-led decentralized treatment program (DTP) and 2) individualized case management (ICM). Viral suppression is defined as a viral load assessment <50 RNA copies/mL. The design will also estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness of study interventions and combinations of interventions compared with maintaining the South African standard of HIV care and treatment.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

TB HIV Care

Durban, South Africa

About this study

RATIONALE: Approximately 60% of the estimated 121,000 - 167,000 female sex workers (FSW) in South Africa are living with HIV. Research suggests only 39% of these women are currently on antiretroviral therapy (ART) and face individual, network and structural level barriers to ART initiation, retention and adherence. To prevent clinical treatment outcome disparities and reduce onward HIV transmission, understanding how best to adapt and implement, scalable and effective interventions to promote viral suppression among marginalized women is paramount. The overall goal of the Siyaphambili study is to inform South African HIV service delivery and scale up determining the most cost-effective package needed to achieve viral suppression among FSW and by characterizing the FSW most in need of these intensive HIV treatment interventions.

HYPOTHESIS: DTP and ICM will be equally effective at achieving viral suppression and will have a synergistic effect when combined and targeted at those who remain non-responsive to either isolated intervention. Additionally, an adaptive, graduated multicomponent intervention to achieve viral suppression would be preferred under standard thresholds for cost-effectiveness over single-intensity interventions or intensive multicomponent interventions for all FSW.

INTERVENTION: The Siyaphambili Study is a sequential multistage adaptive randomized trial (SMART) to compare the effectiveness and durability of two behavioral interventions on the HIV-1 virologic response among FSW living with HIV in Durban, South Africa. The interventions are: 1) nurse-led decentralized treatment program (DTP) and 2) individualized case management (ICM). The design will also estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness of study interventions and combinations of interventions compared with maintaining the South African standard of HIV care and treatment.

STUDY DESIGN: A sequential multistage adaptive randomized study, embedded within the TB/HIV Care program in Durban, South Africa, will enroll 800 viremic FSW into the 18-month trial. Women will be randomized to either DTP or ICM at enrolment and rerandomized 6 months after enrolment based on their response to the initial intervention.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness and durability of nurse-led DTP and ICM in isolation or in combination to achieve viral suppression.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVE: To estimate the incremental impact and cost-effectiveness associated with study interventions and combination of interventions.

OUTCOMES: The primary outcome of the study is retention and viral suppression among those initially randomized to the DTP verse ICM intervention. The secondary outcomes are retention and viral suppression of non-responders, retention and viral suppression among month 6 non-responders, retention and viral suppression at 18 months among month 6 non-responders randomized to continuation of either intervention verse combined DTP+ICM, risk stratification tool, durability of retention and viral suppression of responders, to assess adherence, to assess viral suppression of retained, loss-to-follow-up, intervention acceptability, switching to 2nd/3rd line ART, and ART resistance.

ANALYTIC PLAN:

Primary analysis for primary outcome:

Retention in ART care and viral suppression will be a combined outcome in an intention to treat (ITT) analysis at 18 months to compare participants initially randomized to the DTP verse ICM intervention. Viral suppression is defined as a viral load assessment <50 RNA copies/mL and participants lost to follow up or who experience death during the trial duration will be grouped with non-virally suppressed participants.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Sells sex for goods or money as their main source of income
  • Assigned female sex at birth
  • ≥ 18 years of age
  • Living with HIV; diagnosed ≥ 6 months prior
  • Currently living in Durban
  • If on ART, initiated ≥2 months prior

Exclusion criteria

  • Engagement in an ongoing HIV treatment research study
  • Planning on leaving Durban for more than 3 months in the following 12 months
  • Pregnant at time of enrollment
  • On a second line or third ART regimen
  • Participating in an adherence club

Treatment and study plan

DTP

Behavioral

Provision of antiretroviral therapy (ART) in the community through a mobile-van DTP managed by a nurse capable of initiating and managing ART.

ICM

Behavioral

Peer-led ICM through quarterly face-to-face meetings, monthly phone calls and biweekly text messages.

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Retained and Virally Suppressed Among Those Receiving the DTP Versus ICM Arms

    Time frame: 18 months after enrollment

    Retention and viral suppression at 18 months in those initially randomized to DTP vs. ICM. Participants are considered to be retained in care if they attended their 18-month final study visit and were engaged in care at 18-months. Viral suppression is defined as having less than 50 viral copies per milliliter.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Retention and Viral Suppression of Non-Responders

    Time frame: 18 months after enrollment

    Retention and viral suppression at 18 months among month 6 non-responders randomized to continuation of either intervention vs. combined DTP+ICM

  2. Risk Factors of Loss to Follow-up

    Time frame: Up to 18 months after enrollment

    Risk stratification to identify FSW at highest risk for loss to follow-up.

  3. Durability of Retention and Viral Suppression of Responders

    Time frame: Up to 18 months after enrollment

    Durability of retention and viral suppression among 6 month responders continuing on DTP or ICM vs. those randomized to revert to standard of care (SoC)

  4. Adherence Assessment

    Time frame: 18 months

    Self-reported adherence to assess adherence across arms

  5. Viral Suppression of Retained

    Time frame: Up to 18 months after enrollment

    Among those retained, comparison of viral suppression across arms

  6. Loss-to-Follow-Up

    Time frame: 18 months after study enrollment

    Loss-to-follow-up across arms (DTP vs. ICM). This outcome is presented as an intention to treat analysis based on baseline randomization (DTP vs. ICM). All 777 participants randomized at baseline are included here. Loss to follow-up is defined as having missed the 18-month final study visit.

  7. Intervention Acceptability

    Time frame: Acceptability of each intervention at 6 month timepoint

    Participant reported intervention acceptability

  8. 2nd/3rd Line ART

    Time frame: Up to 18 months after enrollment

    Number of participants who were tested and identified as resistant to first line therapy and were referred to a Department of Health facility for second line therapy across arms

  9. ART Resistance

    Time frame: Up to 18 months after enrollment

    Report and compare resistance across arms

  10. Participants' Costs South in African Rand (ZAR)

    Time frame: Baseline, Follow-up up to 5 months

    Participants' cost data were collected by opportunity cost questionnaire for the intervention arms in the trial and are summarized descriptively to support potential future modeling. Participants' costs are defined as costs associated with attending each visit for HIV care (transportation, food, child-care and other; and money that would have been earned from clients (opportunity cost). Follow-up costs were for attending each DTP/ICM and HIV care clinic visit.

Other outcomes

  1. Decentralized Treatment Provision (DTP) Pick-Ups

    Time frame: Up to 18 months after enrollment

    Number and percentage of DTP pick-ups attended among participants randomized to received DTP.

  2. ICM Phone-Based Contacts

    Time frame: Up to 18 months after enrollment

    Number of ICM phone-based contacts

  3. ICM In-Person Meetings

    Time frame: Up to 18 months after enrollment

    Percentage of face-to-face case manager sessions attended

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health

Other

Collaborators

  • National Institute for Communicable Diseases, South Africa
  • TB HIV Care
  • University of California, San Francisco
  • University of Toronto
  • University of the Western Cape

Registry information

Official study title

An Adaptive Randomized Evaluation of Nurse-Led HIV Treatment Retention Interventions for Women Living With HIV in Durban, South Africa

Important dates

Study start
2018
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2022
First posted
Apr 17, 2018
Registry last updated
Jan 14, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.