Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03155763

Histology of Implantation Biopsies and Kidney Allograft Outcomes

The morphology of transplanted kidney is considered to be important for graft outcomes in early and late posttransplant period. Individual histological lesions at the time of kidney transplantation, such as sclerosis of glomeruli, vascular narrowing and interstitial fibrosis, and composite histological lesions, which integrate histopathological findings in different compartments, showed association with suboptimal graft outcomes. However there are no consistent association between individual or composite lesions and transplant outcomes. Some possible explanations for such inconsistent results are non-uniformity in grading histological lesions or in defining graft outcomes. Furthermore, studies vary in terms of patient selection, and some results are not corrected for covariates. It is also unclear, whether acute biopsy features associated with the donor kidney can provide prognostic information, in addition to the chronic lesions? This single-center study aimed to evaluate which acute and chronic histological lesions and composite histological scores in donor kidney intraoperative biopsies alone or in combination with clinical variables are best associated with short- and long-term kidney graft outcomes, such as impairment of early kidney allograft function, immunological acute kidney allograft rejection, pyelonephritis, allograft function at 1, 3, 6, 12 months, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years, and graft survival at 1 and 5 years.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–70 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Laboratory Diagnostics and General Pathology Department, State Institution "Zaporizhzhia Medical Academy of Post-Graduate Education Ministry of Health of Ukraine"

Zaporizhzhya, 69096, Ukraine

About this study

130 consecutive patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), receiving a kidney only transplant from April 2005 to December 2010 in a single center, and having both intraoperative biopsies with ≥ 7 glomeruli and ≥ 1 arteries and complete follow-up data up to 5 years were included in the study.

Intraoperative biopsy consisted of preimplant biopsy (at the backtable, 1 core) and 30-minutes postreperfusion biopsy (1 core), which were taken in order to study the impact of ischemia/reperfusion injury on transplant outcomes and to serve a reference for subsequent biopsies.

Donor population included live donors (32.6%), ideal deceased donors (50%), expanded-criteria donors (7.9%) and 9.0% of non-heart-beating donors. Donors were subjected to donor evaluation protocol in accordance with local guidelines, including a standard clinical, instrumental and laboratory examination.

All recipients and donors were Caucasians.

Histological scoring Needle (14-18-gauge) biopsies were obtained and tissue was fixed in 10% buffered formalin and embedded in paraffin. A 3-4 µm sections of preimplant and postreperfusion kidney allograft implantation biopsies (KALIMBO) were stained for light microscopy with hematoxylin-eosin (3 slides), periodic acid-Schiff (3 slides), and Masson's trichrome (1 slide). A minimum of 21 tissue sections were examined for each biopsy. Banff-1997 criteria for posttransplant biopsies, Banff-2016 criteria for preimplant biopsies, as well as criteria suggested by Remuzzi et al. (1999) and Cosyns et al. (1998) were applied for scoring.

Based on the estimation of individual acute and chronic lesions, the acute, chronic and total posttransplant and preimplant Banff scores, Remuzzi score, and acute, chronic and total lesion indexes by Cosyns were calculated. In addition, previously published composite histological scores, such as chronic allograft damage index (CADI), donor damage score (DDS), chronic damage score (CDS), and interstitial fibrosis and fibrous thickening score (CIV) were computed.

Clinical risk factors and outcomes examined The analysis was performed 60 months later after the last transplant in the study population. Donor, graft and recipient characteristics and transplant outcomes were extracted from archival patient records and outpatient cards blinded to all pathologic data. Data were retrieved on donor source, sex and age, and cause of death, donation after cardiac death or expanded criteria donation for deceased donors.

Recipient's pretransplant variables included: age, gender, cause of ESRD, body mass index (BMI), dialysis modality and duration, previous transplants, and presence of chronic arterial hypertension, defined as a regular intake of antihypertensive drugs. The information related to transplantation (cold ischemia time and second warm ischemia time) was also obtained. Posttransplant data retrieved were limited to initial graft function (immediate, delayed or slow), and the number and time of occurrence of acute rejection episodes or pyelonephritis, and time of graft failure defined as return to dialysis therapy.

All recipients received triple maintenance immunosuppressive therapy consisting of calcineurin-inhibitor (cyclosporine or tacrolimus), mycophenolate mofetil, and steroid. Each patient, enrolled in this study, was followed for five years until death/return to dialysis or until December 2015.

The end points of the study were impairment of early kidney allograft function, immunological acute kidney allograft rejection, pyelonephritis, allograft function at 1, 3, 6, 12 months, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years, and graft survival at 1 and 5 years.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • adult kidney transplant recipients who underwent transplantation at Zaporizhzhia Transplant Center;
  • cadaveric or living single kidney only transplant;
  • informed written consent;
  • adequate intraoperative biopsy (in total ≥ 7 glomeruli and ≥ 1 arteries in preimplant and postreperfusion biopsies);
  • complete follow-up data up to 5 years.

Exclusion criteria

  • not consent with research;
  • non-complete follow-up data up to 5 years.

Treatment and study plan

Intraoperative kidney allograft preimplantation biopsy; Intraoperative kidney allograft postreperfusion biopsy

Procedure

Primary outcomes

  1. Five-year death-censored kidney allograft survival

    Time frame: Five years

    The time of graft failure was defined as return to dialysis therapy

Secondary outcomes

  1. Delayed graft function

    Time frame: The day 8

    Delayed graft function was defined as the need for dialysis in the first postoperative week without evidence of acute rejection or pyelonephritis

  2. Slow graft function

    Time frame: The day 8

    Slow graft function was defined as serum creatinine on day seven ≥300 μmol/L without evidence of acute rejection or pyelonephritis.

  3. Acute rejection

    Time frame: During five years

    Acute rejection was defined by characteristic clinical symptoms and ultrasound findings and by the need for treatment, with or without biopsy confirmation.

  4. Pyelonephritis

    Time frame: During five years

    Pyelonephritis was defined by characteristic symptoms, a urine sediment analysis, and a urinary culture test.

  5. Allograft function at 1, 3, 6, 12 months, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years

    Time frame: During five years

    Allograft function at 1, 3, 6, 12 months, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years was assessed with glomerular filtration rate (CKD-EP equation).

  6. One-year death-censored kidney allograft survival

    Time frame: One year

    The time of graft failure was defined as return to dialysis therapy

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Andriy Trailin

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Impact of Acute and Chronic Individual Histological Lesions and Composite Scores in Implantation Biopsies on Short-term and Long-term Kidney Allograft Outcomes

Acronym: KALIMBO

Important dates

Study start
2005
Primary completion
2015
Study completion
2015
First posted
May 16, 2017
Registry last updated
May 18, 2017

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.