Geisinger Health
Danville, Pennsylvania, 17822, United States
NCT Number: NCT04561778
This is a randomized, prospective, single-blinded trial to determine the overall rate of successful His-Purkinje conduction system pacing Optimized Trial of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (HOT-CRT) versus biventricular pacing using coronary sinus lead (BVP) to compare acute and mid-term outcomes. Acute outcomes include change in QRS duration pre-and post-pacing (degree of QRS narrowing) and incidence of major periprocedural complications (pericardial tamponade, need for lead revision, etc.). Mid-term outcomes include echocardiographic response at 6 months along with a composite clinical outcome of heart failure hospitalization, ventricular arrhythmias, crossover, and all-cause mortality.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Danville, Pennsylvania, 17822, United States
This is a single-blinded study of 100 patients randomized to a strategy of His-Purkinje conduction system pacing Optimized Trial of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (HOT-CRT) versus biventricular pacing using coronary sinus (CS) lead (BVP). Both treatment options use standard-of-care, FDA-approved devices. The distinction is only in the allocation toward HOT-CRT and BVP. Treating physicians will be aware of assignment in order to facilitate routine device follow-up. Echocardiographic and electrocardiographic evaluation will also be performed in a blinded manner.
Cross-over is permitted between treatment group allocation if:
CS lead cannot be placed due to difficult cannulation of the CS, limited branches at the posterolateral or lateral wall, or phrenic nerve capture. These subjects may then cross-over to HOT-CRT.
HOT-CRT subjects may cross-over if His or left bundle pacing lead cannot be positioned with adequate stability and reasonable pacing output, or if optimal QRS narrowing cannot be achieved.
Implant procedure will be per routine percutaneous access, as is standard for pacemaker and Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators (ICDs). . All subjects will receive an FDA-approved cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemaker or defibrillator device, as per standard of care outlined for the subject.
Follow-up will be performed at 2 weeks post-implant for incision check and device interrogation as is standard of care. In addition, routine device and clinical follow-up will be scheduled at 3 and 6 months. Electrocardiography (ECG) will be performed pre-implant, prior to hospital discharge, at 3 months, and 6 months. Echocardiography will be performed pre-implant and 6 months to evaluate for change in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF), chamber dimensions, volumes, and change in Left Ventricular (LV) end systolic volume index as is standard of care in the treatment of patients with advanced heart failure. New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class and quality of life (utilizing the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) and EQ 5D) will be assessed pre-implant and at 6 months.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Subjects enrolled in the study will receive a permanent cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) (CRT-pacemaker or CRT-defibrillator) as clinically indicated. Subjects randomized to HOT-CRT will have His bundle pacing lead placed initially to achieve CRT. If complete resynchronization is achieved (BBB normalization) but capture thresholds are high (1.5-2V), the lead may be placed in the distal conduction system (left bundle branch area). If only partial QRS narrowing is achieved, a coronary sinus lead may be placed and left ventricular timing may be optimized to achieve maximal resynchronization.
Subjects enrolled in the study will receive a permanent CIED (CRT-pacemaker or CRT-defibrillator) as clinically indicated. Subjects randomized to Biventricular pacing will undergo left ventricular lead placement in the coronary sinus venous branches.
Time frame: 6 months
Improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) - change in LVEF% measured by 2D echo at 6 months compared to baseline
Time frame: 6 months
Freedom from major complications or need for CRT lead revision - complication such as lead dislodgment, pericardial tamponade, pneumothorax, systemic embolism, phrenic nerve stimulation not correctable by programming
Time frame: 6 months
Crossover, ventricular tachycardia (VT)/ventricular fibrillation (VF), Heart failure hospitalization (HFH) or death
Time frame: 6 months
change in LVEF >5%
Pugazhendhi Vijayaraman
Other
Acronym: HOT-CRT
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03389386
Cardiovascular Diseases, Heart Diseases
Split, Split-Dalmatia County, Croatia
View Trial DetailsNCT03575910
Behavior, Cardiovascular Diseases
Omaha, Nebraska, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06540118
Cardiovascular Diseases, Heart Diseases
La Jolla, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03387813
Cardiovascular Diseases, Heart Diseases
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial Details