Universite Bourgogne Europe - faculty of sports sciences
Dijon, France
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT07350434
Neurodynamic mobilization techniques are widely applied in rehabilitation and physiotherapy to enhance the mobility and function of peripheral nerves. Two main approaches are distinguished : Nerve tensioning and nerve flossing. They both involve proximal and distal joint movements to induce greater neural sliding while avoiding excessive tensile stress. However, contradictory findings following neurodynamic stretching highlighted the current lack of consensus regarding the position that should be used. Moreover, neurodynamic techniques are of interest for patients, it appeared it could also be applied in healthy individuals and more particularly in athletes. Accordingly, the primary objective of the present study was to determine the immediate effect of two hip positions (adduction vs. abduction) during neurodynamic flossing techniques on the sciatic nerve and hamstring tissues using the shear wave elastography (SWE, a form of ultrasonography).
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Dijon, France
Location status: Recruiting
Neurodynamic mobilization techniques are frequently applied in rehabilitation settings to enhance the mobility and function of peripheral nerves, particularly in the management of neuropathic pain such as carpal tunnel syndrome, radiculopathies, or sciatica. Two main approaches are distinguished. Nerve tensioning involves maintaining the nerve stretched at the end of the joint range of motion with relatively limited excursion. It is similar to a static stretching intervention but with distal (ankle) and proximal (cervical) tensions. Nerve flossing (also termed gliding or sliders), consists of alternating proximal and distal joint movements to induce greater neural sliding while avoiding excessive tensile stress. Both techniques appear efficient. However, contradictory findings following neurodynamic stretching highlighted the current lack of consensus regarding the angular position that could be used. For instance, hip rotations or hip adduction could impact muscle or nerve tissue changes, particularly in healthy tissues. Moreover, neurodynamic techniques are of interest for patients, it appeared it could also be applied in healthy individuals and more particularly in athletes. Performed in patients, healthy or athletes, no study has compared different hip positions. Accordingly, the primary objective of the present study was to determine the immediate effect of two hip positions (adduction vs. abduction) during neurodynamic flossing techniques on the sciatic nerve and hamstring tissues using the shear wave elastography (SWE, a form of ultrasonography). This method has been shown reliable to provide non-invasive real-time assessments of soft tissues elastic properties.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Neurodynamic flossing was applied at pain threshold on hamstring muscles and repeated 5 times during 60s at the point of pain. During the neurodynamic conditions, head and ankle movement permitted to mobilize nerve tissues. Flossing is the alternation of these movements every 2 seconds.
Time frame: Before the intervention and at the end (immediately after) the intervention
Shear wave velocity of the sciatic nerve will be evaluated by using an ultrasound (echography) device with a specific mode called "shear wave elastography". Briefly, the ultrasound probe will deliver an ultrasound wave. The propagation speed (called '"shear wave velocity") will be measured by the same probe. The greater the velocity is, the harder the tissue is. The hip position was neutral (alignment between the lower limb and the trunk).
Time frame: Before the intervention and at the end (immediately after) the intervention
Shear wave velocity of the sciatic nerve will be evaluated by using an ultrasound (echography) device with a specific mode called "shear wave elastography". Briefly, the ultrasound probe will deliver an ultrasound wave. The propagation speed (called '"shear wave velocity") will be measured by the same probe. The greater the velocity is, the harder the tissue is. The hip position was the experimental position (i.e., adduction or abduction depending on the randomisation).
Time frame: Before the intervention and at the end (immediately after) the intervention
Shear wave velocity of the biceps femoris muscle will be evaluated by using an ultrasound (echography) device with a specific mode called "shear wave elastography". Briefly, the ultrasound probe will deliver an ultrasound wave. The propagation speed (called '"shear wave velocity") will be measured by the same probe. The greater the velocity is, the harder the tissue is. The hip position was neutral (alignment between the lower limb and the trunk).
Time frame: Before the intervention and at the end (immediately after) the intervention
Shear wave velocity of the biceps femoris muscle will be evaluated by using an ultrasound (echography) device with a specific mode called "shear wave elastography". Briefly, the ultrasound probe will deliver an ultrasound wave. The propagation speed (called '"shear wave velocity") will be measured by the same probe. The greater the velocity is, the harder the tissue is. The hip position was the experimental position (i.e., adduction or abduction depending on the randomisation).
Time frame: Before the intervention and at the end (immediately after) the intervention
Maximal torque during a maximal voluntary hamstring contraction
Time frame: Before the intervention and at the end (immediately after) the intervention
Electromyographic activity of biceps femoris muscle
Time frame: Before the intervention and at the end (immediately after) the intervention
Electromyographic activity of semitendinosus
Time frame: Before the intervention and at the end (immediately after) the intervention
The final passive range of motion of the hamstring muscles
Time frame: Before the intervention and at the end (immediately after) the intervention
the stand and reach test to evaluate flexibility (in centimeters)
Time frame: Before the intervention and at the end (immediately after) the intervention
Seated flexibility using the slump test (in degrees)
Time frame: At the end (immediately after) the intervention
rating of perceived discomfort during the intervention (from 1 to 10, no discomfort to maximal discomfort, respectively)
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Carole Cometti
CONTACT
Nicolas Babault
CONTACT
University of Burgundy
Other
The Acute Effects of Neurodynamic Stretching on the Shear Wave Velocity: the Effects of Hip Adduction and Abduction
Acronym: HIPROT
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07304765
Control Condition, Stretching
Dijon, France
View Trial DetailsNCT07649785
Cardiovascular Adaption, Healthy
Palermo, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT07272070
Hemodialysis, Muscle Cramp
Ankara, Çankaya, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07213011
Health, Healthy Participants
Palermo, Italy
View Trial Details