Shaimaa Mohamed Ahmed Elsayeh
Cairo, New Cairo, 02, Egypt
NCT Number: NCT05601245
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of high-voltage pulsed current (HVPC) and microcurrent stimulation therapy (MST) in treating chronic wounds and to compare their effects.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me45 year–60 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Cairo, New Cairo, 02, Egypt
Sixty patients with chronic wounds (pressure ulcers) and their ages will be ranged from 45 to 60 years old. They will be recruited from the outpatient clinic at Kasr Al-Aini Hospitals and they will be randomly assigned into two groups of equal numbers, each one will contain thirty patients. High-voltage pulsed current group and microcurrent stimulation therapy groups. The change in wound surface area and wound volume will be measured before the intervention and after six weeks of intervention.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The treatment session duration is 45 minutes (Reverse the polarity after the first 22 minutes)
Other names: Conventional physical therapy program
The treatment session duration is 40 minutes.
Other names: Conventional physical therapy program
Time frame: Baseline and six weeks after the intervention.
A sterilized transparency film will be placed over the ulcer. The ulcer perimeter was traced by using the film tipped transparency marker. Each ulcer was traced three times to establish measurement reliability. After tracing, the side of the transparency film facing the ulcer will be cleaned with a piece of cotton and alcohol. Carbon paper was placed over the 1-mm-squared metric graph paper. The traced transparency film was placed over the carbon paper with white paper in between and the tracing will be transcribed onto the metric graph paper. WSA was calculated by counting the number of square millimeters on the metric graph within the wound tracing. The mean value of the three trials was calculated and taken to be the wound surface area.
Time frame: Baseline and six weeks after the intervention
Assessment of wound volume was done by saline injection tool. A syringe of twenty cubic centimeters filled with normal sterilized saline was used. The patient was positioned in a comfortable position that allows the wound to be filled with the saline solution maximally. The saline was injected into each wound until its filling. The amount of saline injected was detected in cubic centimeters. These measurements were conducted for each patient before and after of treatment.
Cairo University
Other
High Voltage Pulsed Current Versus Microcurrent Stimulation Therapy in the Treatment of Chronic Wounds
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06464250
Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Complications
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT02581098
Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Complications
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05422846
Behavior, Cardiovascular Diseases
Sanliurfa, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT05741866
Cardiovascular Diseases, Catheter Complications
Herston, Queensland, Australia
View Trial Details