Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT07561177

High Velocity Nasal Insufflation Versus Non Invasive Ventilation in COPD Patients With Acute Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure

This study is a randomized clinical trial that compares two methods of non-invasive respiratory support in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) complicated by acute hypercapnic respiratory failure.

Eligible adult patients admitted with this condition will be randomly assigned to receive either High-Flow Nasal Insufflation (HVNI) or Non-Invasive Ventilation (NIV).

The main goal of the study is to evaluate changes in blood gas levels, especially carbon dioxide (PaCO2), after one hour of treatment. Secondary outcomes include the need for invasive ventilation, length of hospital stay, changes in breathing rate, and in-hospital outcomes.

The study aims to determine whether HVNI can provide a safe and effective alternative to NIV in this group of patients.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Chest Hospital Damanhour

Damanhūr, Egypt

About this study

This study is a prospective randomized controlled trial conducted on adult patients diagnosed with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) complicated by acute hypercapnic respiratory failure (type II respiratory failure), admitted to the respiratory intensive care unit or emergency department.

COPD is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, and acute exacerbations associated with hypercapnic respiratory failure represent a major cause of hospital admission and intensive care utilization. Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is the standard of care in such cases; however, its use may be limited by patient intolerance, discomfort, and contraindications.

High-Flow Nasal Insufflation (HVNI) is an emerging non-invasive respiratory support modality that delivers heated, humidified oxygen at high flow rates, generating low levels of positive airway pressure, reducing dead space ventilation, and improving oxygenation and ventilation. It may offer improved patient comfort and tolerance compared to NIV.

In this study, eligible patients will be randomly assigned into two groups: Group I: High-Flow Nasal Insufflation (HVNI) Group II: Non-Invasive Ventilation (NIV) Baseline clinical data, arterial blood gases, and severity scores will be recorded. Patients will be monitored for clinical and laboratory response.

The primary endpoint is the mean difference in PaCO2 to evaluate the short-term effect of HVNI and NIV from baseline to one hour after randomization.

The secondary endpoints include the following outcomes:

Treatment change rates (switch to other ventilatory support modality due to clinical deterioration) Proportion of patients with PaCO2 worsening or reduction less than 10 mmHg from baseline, or no improvement in dyspnea Respiratory rate Changes in arterial blood gases Duration of mechanical ventilation (invasive and non-invasive) Length of hospital stay In-hospital mortality

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

Adults aged ≥18 years Diagnosis of acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) Acute hypercapnic respiratory failure (PaCO2 > 45 mmHg with acidosis or indication for ventilatory support) Indication for non-invasive ventilatory support Hemodynamically stable patients Ability to provide informed consent or legal representative consent

Exclusion criteria

Age <18 years Immediate need for invasive mechanical ventilation (e.g., apnea, respiratory arrest, severe respiratory distress) Severe hypoxemia (PaO2 < 55 mmHg despite oxygen therapy) Severe acidosis (pH < 7.25) with hypercapnia Neuromuscular disease Unstable hemodynamics (SBP < 90 mmHg or MAP < 65 mmHg despite resuscitation) Hypercapnic respiratory failure due to non-COPD causes Contraindications to HVNI or NIV (facial trauma, obstruction, severe agitation, etc.) Pregnancy BMI > 30 kg/m²

Treatment and study plan

High-Velocity Nasal Insufflation (HVNI)

Device

High-velocity nasal insufflation delivering heated and humidified oxygen at high flow rates through nasal cannula. It provides low level positive airway pressure, washout of anatomical dead space, reduction of work of breathing, and improvement in oxygenation and ventilation in patients with acute hypercapnic respiratory failure.

Non-invasive ventilation (NIV)

Device

Non-invasive ventilation delivered via face mask providing positive pressure support to improve alveolar ventilation, decrease PaCO2, correct respiratory acidosis, and reduce work of breathing in patients with acute hypercapnic respiratory failure.

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in arterial carbon dioxide (PaCO2)

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 hour after randomization

Secondary outcomes

  1. Need for escalation to invasive mechanical ventilation

    Time frame: Up to 4 days after randomization

    Proportion of patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation

  2. Change in arterial pH from baseline to 24 hours after randomization

    Time frame: Baseline and 24 hours

  3. Change from baseline in arterial carbon dioxide (PaCO₂)

    Time frame: Baseline to 24 hours after randomization

  4. Change in arterial pH from baseline to 24 hours after randomization

    Time frame: Baseline and 24 hours after randomization

  5. Change from baseline in respiratory rate

    Time frame: Baseline to 24 hours after randomization

  6. Length of hospital stay

    Time frame: Up to 30 days

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Al-Azhar University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

High-velocity Nasal Insufflation Versus Non-invasive Mechanical Ventilation in COPD Patients With Acute Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure

Acronym: HVNI vs NIV CO

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
May 1, 2026
Registry last updated
May 1, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.