High-Strength Suture vs. Traditional Tension Band for Patellar Fractures

Patellar fractures account for approximately 1% of all fractures and are common in knee injuries. Traditional tension band fixation is widely used but associated with issues such as hardware migration, soft tissue irritation, and postoperative pain, impacting rehabilitation and quality of life. High-strength sutures offer improved biomechanical properties, flexibility, and reduced soft tissue damage. This study observes the clinical efficacy of high-strength suture modified tension band fixation compared to traditional methods through a prospective cohort design.

Patients admitted to Fuzhou University Affiliated Provincial Hospital from February 2024 to February 2026 with patellar fractures undergoing surgery will be divided into two groups based on surgical method: Suture Fixation (SF) group and Screw-Cable Tension Band (SCTB) group. Follow-up will occur for 12 months, assessing outcomes such as postoperative VAS pain scores, Lysholm knee scores, ROM, SF-36 health surveys, surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, and complications (e.g., infection, fixation failure, nonunion).

General data collected includes demographics (age, gender, height, weight, BMI), comorbidities (e.g., diabetes, hypertension, smoking), ASA classification, fracture details (side, type, displacement, mechanism, time from injury), and perioperative complications. Imaging assessments include fracture reduction quality (good, satisfactory, poor) via X-ray, healing time (weeks until fracture line blurs/disappears), and patellar height via Insall-Salvati index. Muscle strength (quadriceps via MMT, 0-5 grades) and patient satisfaction (1-5 scale) will also be evaluated.

Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) will be recorded, reported to the ethics committee, and managed promptly. Statistical analysis will use IBM SPSS Statistics 27.0, with t-tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, chi-square/Fisher's exact tests, Kaplan-Meier curves, and regressions as appropriate. Intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis will be primary, with multiple imputation for missing data.

The study is feasible given the hospital's patient volume and the principal investigator's experience. Ethical principles follow the Helsinki Declaration, with informed consent and privacy protection. Results will be published in academic journals and presented at conferences.

Inclusion criteria

• 1.Age 18-55 years. 2.Radiographically confirmed patellar fracture (AO/OTA 34-C1 or 34-C2). 3.First-time patellar fracture surgery. 4.Time from injury to surgery ≤ 2 weeks. 5.Able to comply with follow-up and provide written informed consent. 6.Normal pre-injury knee function. 7.Able to tolerate surgery and agree to surgical treatment. 8.Intact cognitive function.

Exclusion criteria

• 1.Age <18 or >55 years. 2.Pathological fractures. 3.Prior patellar surgery or severe underlying patellofemoral disease. 4.Time from injury to surgery >2 weeks. 5.Concurrent active infection or severe medical conditions. 6.Severe neuropsychiatric disorders affecting follow-up compliance. 7.Postmenopausal women. 8.Inability to tolerate surgery or refusal of surgery. 9.Comorbid patellar dysplasia, rheumatoid arthritis, or other patellofemoral diseases.

10.Comorbid systemic or local infection at surgical site. 11.Comorbid severe lower limb or systemic injuries. 12.Pre-injury cognitive impairment, mental disorder, or independent walking disability.

13.Other conditions unsuitable for enrollment.