University Hospital La Paz, Department of Cardiology
Madrid, Spain
NCT Number: NCT04153747
Multicenter 1:1 randomized study. Two atrial fibrillation ablation strategies are compared: 1) conventional ablation using point-by-point radiofrequency applications with power 40 W guided by LSI > 6 or AI > 500 on the anterior aspect of pulmonary veins and power 25 W guided by LSI >5 or AI >350 on the posterior wall near the esophagus; 2) point-by-point RF applications with power set at 70 W and duration 9-10 s. The main objective of the trial is the incidence of esophageal lesions evaluated with systematic endoscopy and clinical efficacy evaluated with daily ECG transtelephonic transmissions during 1-year follow-up. Secondary objectives include total RF time and parameters of acute PV isolation efficacy (first-pass isolation, acute reconnections and dormant conduction).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Madrid, Spain
Multicenter 1:1 randomized study: Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid; Hospital Clínico Universitario San Carlos, Madrid; Hospital Clínico y Provincial de Barcelona, Barcelona; Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Pamplona; Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid; Hospital Clínico Universitario de Albacete; Hospital Clínico Universitario de Alicante; Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada; Hospital La Fe, Valencia; Hospital Clínico de Valencia; Hospital Universitario Juan Ramón Jiménez, Huelva; Hospital de la Ribera, Alzira, Valencia. España. Spain.
Two atrial fibrillation ablation strategies are compared: 1) conventional ablation using point-by-point radiofrequency applications with power 40 W guided by LSI > 6 or AI > 500 on the anterior aspect of pulmonary veins and power 25-40 W guided by LSI >5 or AI >350 on the posterior wall near the esophagus; 2) point-by-point RF applications with power set at 70 W and duration 9-10 s.
The main objective of the trial is the incidence of esophageal lesions evaluated with systematic endoscopy and clinical efficacy evaluated with daily ECG transtelephonic transmissions during 1-year follow-up. Secondary objectives include total RF time and parameters of acute PV isolation efficacy (first-pass isolation, acute reconnections and dormant conduction).
Subestudy: asymptomatic cerebral lesions detected by 1,5 T MRI <72 h after ablation. Not all centers participate in the subestydy. However, if the center participates, all patients in both ablation groups will be included in the subestudy.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Pulmonary veins electrical isolation: high-power and short-duration ablation
Pulmonary veins electrical isolation: low-power ablation.
Esophageal endoscopy to detect postablation esophageal thermal lesions.
Transtelephonic daily 30-seconds single lead electrocardiogram
Other names: Transtelephonic daily 30-seconds single lead electrocardiogram
Time frame: 24 hours after ablation (permissible up to 72 hours after ablation)
Incidence of thermal esophageal lesions evaluated by endoscopy
Time frame: 1 year
Recurrences of any atrial arrhythmias >30 seconds during 1-year follow-up evaluated by daily transtelephonic ECG transmissions (at least 1 ECG/day and additional transmissions whenever the patient perceives arrhythmia-related symptoms).
Time frame: during ablation procedure
Total radiofrequency time required for complete pulmonary veins isolation (included acute intraprocedural reconnections and dormant conduction).
Hospital Universitario La Paz
Other
High-power Short-duration Radiofrequency Application for Faster and Safer Pulmonary Vein Ablation Trial (POWER FAST III Trial)
Acronym: POWER-FAST
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06160076
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Pessac, France
View Trial DetailsNCT06731595
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05273645
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Lübeck, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT02846922
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
View Trial Details