Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02786316

High Intensity Training With Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain

Low back pain is a common disorder, occurring worldwide in both males and females in all age groups1. The prevalence is higher in females and the incidence peaks between 30 and 65 years. It is currently the most frequent musculoskeletal cause of functional disability and it has a major socio-economic impact on today's society. Although a small percentage of persons with low back pain can be diagnosed with a specific underlying cause, almost 90% of persons with low back pain present with symptoms of nonspecific origin. A part of these symptoms are only of short duration, but 23% of all people will develop nonspecific chronic low back pain (NSCLBP).

Exercise therapy (ET) is currently an important component in the treatment of NSCLBP. Previous studies analysed the effects of various modes of exercise therapy, such as motor control therapy, core stability training and aerobic conditioning training. However, therapy outcomes can be low, and guidelines in favour of using a specific program are contradictory. It thus still remains unclear which therapy modality is best suited. Furthermore, no recommendations are available about optimal training intensities during rehabilitation of persons with NSCLBP.

Since as well aerobic as muscular deconditioning are apparent in persons with chronic low back pain and improvements in overall physical fitness can affect therapy outcomes in this population, ET specifically focussing on physical fitness can be advocated for NSCLBP rehabilitation. High Intensity Training (HIT), has been promoted as an effective and efficient training method for improving physical fitness and health related parameters in healthy persons. Also, HIT resulted in successful reconditioning and improvement of functional and disease related outcomes in persons with other chronic diseases such as multiple sclerosis, heart failure, COPD and cardiometabolic diseases. Although some studies showed promising results for the effect of HIT on low back pain such as high intensity isolated, evidence is still scarce and study results are unclear because of methodological shortcomings.To evaluate HIT for the rehabilitation of persons with NSCLBP, a therapy program was developed consisting of high intensity interval cardio and high load whole body strength training.

The aim of this pilot study is 1) to evaluate the feasibility of a HIT program for the rehabilitation of persons with NSCLBP, and 2) to evaluate the effects of a HIT program on disease related outcomes and physical fitness compared to a conventional rehabilitation program in persons with NSCLBP.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Jessa Ziekenhuis

Hasselt, 3500, Belgium

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • medically diagnosed with non-specific chronic low back pain4,
  • over 18 years old,
  • able to understand Dutch (spoken and written).

Exclusion criteria

  • invasive surgery at the lumbar spine in the last 18 months (arthrodesis was excluded, microsurgery was allowed),
  • radiculopathy (uni- or bilateral),
  • co-morbidities: paresis and/or sensory disturbances by neurological causes, diabetes mellitus, rheumatoid arthritis, an increase of pain of 3 points with a result of > 8/10 on the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) in the last 48 hours, pregnancy,
  • ongoing compensation claims and/or (work)disability > 6 months,
  • rehabilitation/exercise therapy program for LBP in the past 6 months.

Treatment and study plan

HIT program

Other

HIT program for the rehabilitation of persons with NSCLBP

conventional rehabilitation program

Other

a conventional rehabilitation program in persons with NSCLBP

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain

    Time frame: day 1

    Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) The NPRS is a nominal scale on which the participant indicates the amount of pain he/she perceives at that current moment. It consists of a line indicating eleven successive scores (0-10), whereby score 0 means 'no pain' and score 10 means 'worst pain imaginable'. An improvement of 2 levels or more is accepted as clinically relevant

  2. Pain

    Time frame: week 6

    Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) The NPRS is a nominal scale on which the participant indicates the amount of pain he/she perceives at that current moment. It consists of a line indicating eleven successive scores (0-10), whereby score 0 means 'no pain' and score 10 means 'worst pain imaginable'. An improvement of 2 levels or more is accepted as clinically relevant

  3. Kinesiophobia

    Time frame: day 1

    Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK) The TSK is an ordinal 17 item questionnaire that inventories pain-related fear of movement for persons with subacute and chronic low back pain or fibromyalgia41,42. A higher score relates to more pain-related fear.

  4. Kinesiophobia

    Time frame: week 6

    Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK) The TSK is an ordinal 17 item questionnaire that inventories pain-related fear of movement for persons with subacute and chronic low back pain or fibromyalgia41,42. A higher score relates to more pain-related fear.

  5. physical disability

    Time frame: day 1

    Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) The RMDQ is an ordinal 24 item questionnaire for evaluating the disability level of the patient with low back pain with regards to activities of daily living33,35. A higher score correlates to a higher level of disability and a change of 5 is the minimal clinically important difference36

  6. physical disability

    Time frame: week 6

    Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) The RMDQ is an ordinal 24 item questionnaire for evaluating the disability level of the patient with low back pain with regards to activities of daily living33,35. A higher score correlates to a higher level of disability and a change of 5 is the minimal clinically important difference36

  7. Endurance capacity

    Time frame: day 1

    Endurance capacity test Endurance capacity is tested to volitional fatigue on an electronically braked bike ergometer (eBike Basic, General Electric GmbH, Bitz, Germany).

  8. Endurance capacity

    Time frame: week 6

    Endurance capacity test Endurance capacity is tested to volitional fatigue on an electronically braked bike ergometer (eBike Basic, General Electric GmbH, Bitz, Germany).

  9. Body composition

    Time frame: day 1

    Measured by Dual Energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA)

  10. Body composition

    Time frame: week 6

    Measured by Dual Energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA)

  11. weight

    Time frame: day 1

  12. Weight

    Time frame: week 6

  13. BMI (Body Mass Index)

    Time frame: day 1

  14. BMI (Body Mass Index)

    Time frame: week 6

Secondary outcomes

  1. physical activity

    Time frame: day 1

    Actigraph GT3X activity monitors Activity of the daily routine will be evaluated by means of wearing an accelerometer throughout 3 consecutive days. A schedule will be inventoried by the participant.

  2. physical activity

    Time frame: week 6

    Actigraph GT3X activity monitors Activity of the daily routine will be evaluated by means of wearing an accelerometer throughout 3 consecutive days. A schedule will be inventoried by the participant.

  3. disability in participation and quality of life

    Time frame: day 1

    Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)

  4. disability in participation and quality of life

    Time frame: week 6

    Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)

  5. Questionaire motivation and Therapy Adherence

    Time frame: day 1

  6. Questionaire motivation and Therapy Adherence

    Time frame: week 6

    questionaire

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Hasselt University

Other

Collaborators

  • Jessa Hospital

Registry information

Official study title

High Intensity Training in Patients With Non-Specific Chronic Low Back Pain: A Clinical Pilot Trial

Acronym: LBP-HIT

Important dates

Study start
2015
Primary completion
2016
Study completion
2016
First posted
Jun 1, 2016
Registry last updated
Sep 19, 2016

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.