Beni-Suef University
Banī Suwayf, Sharq, 11222, Egypt
NCT Number: NCT05616611
Background: The relationship between immobilization and localized osteoporosis is well documented in chronic stroke patients. Hemiparetic patients are predisposed to fractures and usual activity impairment due to a considerable loss of bone density. A serious health care challenge is finding ways to reduce osteoporosis and associated fractures among stroke survivors. This study aimed to compare the effects of HILT and ESWT in treating osteoporosis and its consequences in hemiparetic patients.
Patients and Methods: A randomized controlled trial was performed at the Faculty of Physical Therapy Outpatient Clinic, Cairo University. One hundred and twenty hemiplegic patients with osteoporosis of both sexes were chosen randomly. They were randomly classified into three equal groups (n=40 in each group). The control group received medication and traditional physiotherapy programs for stroke patients (strengthening, stretching, and balance exercise). The high-intensity laser (HIL) group received the same intervention as the control group in addition to high-intensity laser therapy. The shock wave (SW) group received the same intervention as the control group in addition to shock wave therapy. The three groups received an intervention that lasted 3 sessions/week for 12 weeks). All groups were assessed before and after therapy (3 months) for the degree of pain, which was evaluated by visual analog scale (VAS), fall risk assessment (overall stability index and Short Form of Berg Balance Scale (SFBBS)), and Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO-41).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me60 year–70 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Banī Suwayf, Sharq, 11222, Egypt
randomized controlled trial was performed at the Faculty of Physical Therapy Outpatient Clinic, Cairo University. One hundred and twenty hemiplegic patients with osteoporosis of both sexes were chosen randomly. They were randomly classified into three equal groups (n=40 in each group). The control group received medication and traditional physiotherapy programs for stroke patients (strengthening, stretching, and balance exercise). The high-intensity laser (HIL) group received the same intervention as the control group in addition to high-intensity laser therapy. The shock wave (SW) group received the same intervention as the control group in addition to shock wave therapy. The three groups received an intervention that lasted 3 sessions/week for 12 weeks). All groups were assessed before and after therapy (3 months) for the degree of pain, which was evaluated by visual analog scale (VAS), fall risk assessment (overall stability index and Short Form of Berg Balance Scale (SFBBS)), and Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO-41).
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
intervention that lasted 3 sessions/week for 12 weeks).
intervention that lasted 3 sessions/week for 12 weeks).
intervention that lasted 3 sessions/week for 12 weeks).
Time frame: 12 weeks
Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis
Time frame: 12 weeks
Visual analogue scale, a scale of 10 poi to 0 represent no pain at all and 10 represent the worst pain
Time frame: 12 weeks
Short Form of Berg Balance Scale ,(SFBBS) ranged from 0 poor balance to 28 good balance.consisted of 7 items each item has grades from 1 poor balance to 4 good balance
Beni-Suef University
Other
High-Intensity Laser Therapy Versus Shockwave Therapy on Selected Outcome Measures in Osteoporotic Long Term Hemiparetic Patients: A Randomized Control Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06421597
Osteoporosis Secondary
Esbjerg, Denmark
View Trial DetailsNCT07236658
Axillary Web Syndrome, Breast Cancer Surgery Pain
Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07256769
Breast Cancer Females, Osteoporosis Secondary
Latina, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT07725081
Attitudes, Behavior
Afyonkarahisar, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details