Kennesaw State University
Kennesaw, Georgia, 30144, United States
NCT Number: NCT05821504
The goal of this clinical trial was to compare to different types of high-intensity interval training in young, healthy females. The main questions were: Will changes in body composition differ between the two interventions? Will changes in endurance and muscle performance differ between the two interventions? Participants were randomized to 8 weeks of high-intensity interval training involving body weight, plyometric exercises or cycling only. Researchers compared changes in endurance performance, body composition, and muscle performance to determine if there were differences between groups.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–35 year
Female
Interventional
Not applicable
Kennesaw, Georgia, 30144, United States
The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of plyometric- and cycle-oriented high-intensity interval training on body composition, aerobic capacity, and skeletal muscle size, quality, and function in recreationally trained females. Young (21.7 ± 3.1 yrs), recreationally active females were randomly assigned to 8 weeks of twice weekly plyometric (n = 15) or cycling (n = 15) high-intensity interval training. The plyometric-oriented Les Mills BODYATTACK program was used for the plyometric group whereas Les Mills SPRINT, which exclusively involves stationary cycling, represented the cycling group. Both protocols involved alternating high-intensity and recovery intervals, and participants were consistently instructed to give maximal effort during the 'work' periods.
The 30 min plyometric routines included four blocks of high-intensity exercise intervals. The 'work' portions consisted of the following exercises: high-knee runs, plyometric lunges, jumping jacks, squat jumps, burpees, and speed-agility patterns. The recovery periods consisted of complete rest (transitioning between exercises), a light jog, or a low impact stepping motion. On average, participants were instructed to give maximal effort for 1-2 min, with recovery intervals of 15-45 sec. Four separate routines were used throughout the duration of the study, keeping one routine per week; participants completed each routine a total of 4 times within a session.
The 30 min cycling routines were performed on upright stationary bikes (Schwinn, AC Performance, Chicago, IL). Protocols involved 'work' ranging from 20-80 sec with recovery intervals between 10-60 sec. Recovery intervals consisted of complete rest on bike or particularly slow cycling. Resistance and cycling speed were relatively variable across sessions, with some intervals of higher resistance and lower speed and others involving lower resistance and higher speed (e.g., >120 RPMs). The same four workouts were used throughout the duration of the study alternating each week.
Body composition (4-compartment model), VO2peak, countermovement jump performance, muscle size and echo intensity (muscle quality) as well as strength and power of the knee extensors and plantar flexors were measured before and after training. Body composition testing was completing using dual-energy x-ray absorpiometry, air displacement plethysmogrphay, and bioeletrical impedance. VO2peak was measured using a standardized maximal exercise test on a treadmill. Countermovement jump height and power was recorded with participants performing jumps on a force plate. Muscle size and quality were determined using non-invasive ultrasonography. Finally, serum growth hormone responses to the VO2peak test were measured before and after the protocols.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The training intervention is a popular exercise format that consist of alternating brief bouts of high-intensity efforts with bouts of light effort or complete rest.
Time frame: Pre-intervention
echo-intensity value derived from ultrasound that indicates the amount of fat infiltration in muscle
Time frame: At week 9
echo-intensity value derived from ultrasound that indicates the amount of fat infiltration in muscle
Time frame: Pre-intervention
Amount of fat tissue a person possesses
Time frame: At week 9
Amount of fat tissue a person possesses
Time frame: Pre-intervention
The acute, exercise-induced response for growth hormone
Time frame: At week 9
The acute, exercise-induced response for growth hormone
Time frame: Pre-intervention
Height of jump
Time frame: At week 9
Height of jump
Time frame: Pre-intervention
How quickly muscle torque is generated
Time frame: At week 9
How quickly muscle torque is generated
Time frame: Pre-intervention
Standard measure of maximal oxygen consumption or peak aerobic capacity during exercise
Time frame: At week 9
Standard measure of maximal oxygen consumption or peak aerobic capacity during exercise
Time frame: Pre-intervention
Relative amount of body fat a person possesses
Time frame: At week 9
Relative amount of body fat a person possesses
Time frame: Pre-intervention
Amount of non-fat tissue a person possesses
Time frame: At week 9
Amount of non-fat tissue a person possesses
Time frame: Pre-intervention
Strength of a muscle
Time frame: At week 9
Strength of a muscle
Time frame: Pre-intervention
The size of a muscle
Time frame: At week 9
The size of a muscle
Time frame: Pre-intervention
Product of torque and velocity as determined on a dynamometer
Time frame: At week 9
Product of torque and velocity as determined on a dynamometer
Time frame: during 8-week exercise intervention
A descriptor of the exercise physiological intensity for both protocols
Time frame: during 8-week exercise intervention
Perceived intensity derived from the rating of perceived exertion scale
Time frame: Pre-intervention
Amount of calories consumed at beginning and end of protocol
Time frame: At week 9
Amount of calories consumed at beginning and end of protocol
Time frame: Pre-intervention
Amount of protein consumed at beginning and end of protocol
Time frame: At week 9
Amount of protein consumed at beginning and end of protocol
Time frame: Pre-intervention
The highest heart rate attained during maximal exercise testing
Time frame: At week 9
The highest heart rate attained during maximal exercise testing
Kennesaw State University
Other
Effects of Plyometric- and Cycle-Based High-Intensity Interval Training on Body Composition, Aerobic Capacity, and Muscle Function in Young Females: a Field-based Group Fitness Assessment
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06068257
Breast Cancer, Breast Diseases
Orlando, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06702423
Healthy
London, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT07223164
Healthy
Irvine, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05595902
Healthy
Kadıköy, Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details