University of California, Davis
Davis, California, 95616, United States
NCT Number: NCT06227507
The goal of this trial is to understand which of five "High In" front-of-package label designs is most effective at helping consumers identify the healthiest products (i.e., products that are high in the fewest number of nutrients of concern: added sugar, sodium, and saturated fat).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–99 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Davis, California, 95616, United States
The objective of this aim is to assess which of five "High In" front-of-package label (FOPL) designs is most effective at helping consumers identify the healthiest products (i.e., products that are high in the fewest number of nutrients of concern: added sugar, sodium, and saturated fat). The investigators will use a between-subjects randomized experiment to assess the primary outcome. Participants will be randomized to one of five label conditions modeled after the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's draft "High In" FOPL designs: 1) No Icon; 2) Magnifying Glass; 3) Exclamation Mark; 4) Exclamation Mark with multiple labels; 5) Exclamation Mark with Black Background.
The primary outcome is correct identification of the healthiest product, defined as the product that is high in the fewest nutrients of concern, including added sugars, sodium, and saturated fat (percent correct for each condition). Secondary outcomes include correct identification of which product is least healthy; which product(s) are high in added sugars, saturated fat, and sodium (3 separate questions); and perceived message effectiveness (PME) of the different labels.
Logit models will be used to compare proportions in each condition that correctly identified the items (each condition compared to every other condition). For continuous outcomes (e.g., knowledge, PME scale), the investigators will use linear regression models regressing the outcome on an indicator for experimental condition. A critical alpha 0.05 will be used, and statistical tests will be two-tailed. The Bonferroni Holm correction will be used for analyses comparing conditions 2-5 to each other for each outcome (6 comparisons).
The investigators will also measure nutrition literacy, and assess moderation on the primary outcome by nutrition literacy (continuous) and highest education attainment (Bachelor's Degree or higher vs. less than Bachelor's Degree).
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Participants will identify the healthfulness of three packaged foods, each displayed with front-of-package labels as specified by their assigned group.
Time frame: During a ~10 minute online survey
Measured with: "Which of the products below is the healthiest in terms of added sugars, sodium, and saturated fat content? The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommends limiting consumption of added sugars, sodium, and saturated fat."
There is no formal name for this measure/scale.
Time frame: During a ~10 minute online survey
Measured with: "Which of the products below is the least healthy in terms of added sugars, sodium, and saturated fat content? The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommends limiting consumption of added sugars, sodium, and saturated fat."
Time frame: During a ~10 minute online survey
Measured with: "Which product(s) below are high in sodium? Select all that apply."
Time frame: During a ~10 minute online survey
Measured with: "Which product(s) below are high in saturated fat? Select all that apply."
Time frame: During a ~10 minute online survey
Measured with: "Which product(s) below are high in added sugars? Select all that apply."
Time frame: During a ~10 minute online survey
Measured with discouragement item from University of North Carolina Perceived Message Effectiveness Scale: How much does this label discourage you from wanting to eat this product? Response options include Not at all, A little bit, Somewhat, Quite a bit, and A great deal.
Time frame: During a ~10 minute online survey
Measured with: "How confident are you that you understand Nutrition Facts labels? Below is an example of a Nutrition Facts label. [Nutrition Facts label displayed]". Response options include Not at all confident, A little confident, Somewhat confident, Very confident, and Extremely confident
University of California, Davis
Other
FDA Front-of-package Pretest: High In Labels
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.