Center for Clinical Research
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103, United States
NCT Number: NCT02265848
Study designed to compare the conventional stimulation programming versus the high frequency stimulation programming of the spinal cord stimulator for subjects who already have a spinal cord stimulator.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–70 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103, United States
Subject with Precision models of spinal cord stimulators will be invited to take part in the study that will compare the high frequency stimulation versus low frequency stimulation to look for any changes in efficacy, and preferability between high and low frequency stimulation program for the spinal cord stimulator (SCS) system.
The study is designed as 7 week study that can take up to 9 weeks per subject. 7 weeks are divided into 3 segments. First segment will be 3 weeks of spinal cord stimulation followed by second segment of wash off period, which will take 1 week (7 days), then the last segment with 3 weeks of spinal cord stimulation. At the end of each segments, there will be a follow up visits.
Each follow up visits can occur up to 5 business days after the follow up due date for post spinal cord stimulation follow ups, and up to 3 business days after the follow up due date for the post wash off visit.
At each visits, including baseline, subject will be asked to answer Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Patients Global Impression of Change (PGIC) to assess interval effect of the programming parameter for the spinal cord stimulator.
Visit schedule and assessment summary:
Visit 1: Screening and Baseline
Visit 2: (end of 3 week assessments, + 5 days) End of first treatment period
Visit 3: (end of wash off period, +3 days) Beginning of second treatment period
Visit 4: (end of 3 week assessment +5 days) End of Treatment
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Implanted pulse generator of a spinal cord stimulator will programmed to deliver high frequency stimulation for pain relief. For our purposes, high frequency stimulation will be defined as 1000 hertz.
Implanted pulse generator of a spinal cord stimulator will programmed to deliver low frequency stimulation for pain relief. Low frequency stimulation will be defined as conventional stimulation pulse generator programming.
Time frame: Baseline (visit 1), and at each follow up visits (visits 2, 3, and 4)
Digital pain rating system that scores patient's subjective pain rating from 0 to 10; with greater number indicating progressively worsening pain. NPRS were measured at baseline (visit1), and at each follow ups visits at visit 2, 3 and 4. Visit 2 and 4 captured post treatment (either 1000 Hz or standard stimulation depending on the randomization) results, and visit 3 captured NPRS after the wash off from the spinal cord stimulation.
Time frame: Baseline (visit 1), and at each follow up visits (visits 2, 3, and 4)
ODI is a outcome metrics that is design to assess the severity of disability based on 10 activity categories. ODI is based on 0 to 100% scale, where larger percentage implies worse disability. (There are 5 categories: 0-20%: Minimal disability, 21-40%: Moderate disability, 41-60%: Severe disability, 61-80%: Crippled. 81-100%: Either bed bound or exaggerating symptoms). ODI were measured at baseline (visit1), and at each follow ups visits at visit 2, 3 and 4. Visit 2 and 4 captured post treatment (either 1000 Hz or standard stimulation depending on the randomization) results, and visit 3 captured NPRS after the wash off from the spinal cord stimulation.
Time frame: Baseline (visit 1), and at each follow up visits (visits 2, 3, and 4)
PGIC is a 7-point scale that requires study subjects to rate the severity of their illness or medical condition after a specific treatment. 1: No change, 2: Almost the same, 3: A little better, 4: Somewhat better, 5: Moderately better, 6: Better, 7: A great deal better. Study subjects were asked to report their impression of changes at baseline visit, visit 2 through 4.
Time frame: End of treatment visit on visit 4
At the conclusion of the study, subjects were asked to report which spinal cord stimulation modes they preferred. Subjects were presented with two boxes (1000 Hz. stimulation and Standard stimulation) and asked to check one.
The Center for Clinical Research, Winston-Salem, NC
Other
Single Blinded, Randomized Control Trial of High Frequency Stimulation in Subjects With Precision® Spinal Cord Stimulator System to Assess Efficacy and Preferability in Back and Extremity Pain Relief
Acronym: HFSCS
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07170722
Autonomic Nervous System Diseases, Back Pain
Umeå, Västerbotten County, Sweden
View Trial DetailsNCT04060875
Arthritis, Arthritis, Rheumatoid
San Francisco, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07649707
Back Pain, Behavior
Raimbeaucourt, France
View Trial DetailsNCT05167877
Back Pain, Bronchial Diseases
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
View Trial Details