Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03370666

High Flow Nasal Therapy Versus Noninvasive Ventilation in COPD Exacerbation

Randomized multicenter non-inferiority trial comparing High flow nasal therapy (HFNT) versus Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and acute hypercapnic respiratory failure.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Ospedale S. Donato, Arezzo, Italy

Loading trial locations.

About this study

The interventions will be delivered in Emergency Departments or Intensive Care Units.

The intervention under investigation will be High flow nasal therapy. Investigators will deliver HFNT to enrolled patients using any available device able to produce it. The flow will be initially set at 60 liters per minute and temperature at 37° C. The target will be an oxygen saturation (SpO2) of 88-92%. In case of patient not tolerating these settings, flow and temperature will be titrated to the maximum tolerated level. The intervention will last until one of the following conditions: 1) physician in charge decide to interrupt HFNT and start NIV because the patient shows signs of persisting worsening respiratory failure; 2) physician in charge decide to interrupt HFNT and perform endotracheal intubation and invasive mechanical ventilation because patient shows one or more of these conditions: respiratory arrest, respiratory pauses with loss of consciousness, psychomotor agitation making nursing care impossible, heart rate < 50 with loss of alertness, hemodynamic instability with systolic arterial blood pressure <70 mmHg, development of conditions requiring intubation either to protect the airway or to manage copious tracheal secretions, inability to tolerate the devices; 3) clinical improvement defined as all these conditions: normal mental status, hemodynamic stability, respiratory rate below 25 per minute, absence of activation of accessory respiratory muscles and paradoxical abdominal motion, no dyspnea arterial pH > 7.35, Arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) < 70 mmHg and Arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) > 55 mmHg with an inspired oxygen fraction (FiO2) < 0.35.

In case of temporary interruption of the intervention for any cause, patients should receive oxygen supplementation with Venturi mask with a target of SpO2 88-92%.The comparator will be non invasive ventilation (NIV). NIV must be delivered by full or oronasal mask. The ventilator settings will be decided according to the usual practice: maximal tolerated inspiratory pressure to obtain a measured or estimated expired tidal volume of 6-8 mL·kg-1 of body weight and a positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) between 3 and 5 cmH2O. An interface rotational strategy will be allowed among only different types of masks.

The intervention will last until one of the following conditions: 1) physician in charge decide to interrupt NIV and perform endotracheal intubation and invasive mechanical ventilation because patient shows one or more of these conditions: respiratory arrest, respiratory pauses with loss of consciousness, psychomotor agitation making nursing care impossible, heart rate < 50 with loss of alertness, hemodynamic instability with systolic arterial blood pressure <70 mmHg, development of conditions requiring intubation either to protect the airway or to manage copious tracheal secretions, inability to tolerate the devices; 2) clinical improvement defined as all these conditions: normal mental status, hemodynamic stability, respiratory rate below 25 per minute, absence of activation of accessory respiratory muscles and paradoxical abdominal motion, no dyspnoea arterial pH > 7.35, Arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) < 70 mmHg and Arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) > 55 mmHg with an inspired oxygen fraction (FiO2) < 0.35.

In case of temporary interruption of NIV for any cause, patients should receive oxygen supplementation with Venturi mask with a target of SpO2 88-92%.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Presence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and acute hypercapnic respiratory failure;
  • 7.25 < pH < 7.35;
  • Arterial Partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) equal or greater than 55 mmHg;
  • Age > 18 years/old

Exclusion criteria

  • Invasive mechanical ventilation in the last 60 days
  • Use of any form of noninvasive ventilation or high flow oxygen through nasal cannula (HFNT) prior to study enrollment after the onset of acute hypercapnic respiratory failure (AHRF);
  • Noninvasive home care ventilation;
  • Unstable clinical condition (need for vasopressors for >24 h, acute coronary syndrome or life-threatening arrhythmias);
  • Refusal of treatment;
  • Agitation (RASS >= +2) or non-cooperation (Kelly Matthay >=5);
  • Failure of more than two organs;
  • Cardiac arrest;
  • Respiratory arrest requiring tracheal intubation;
  • Recent trauma or burns of the neck and face;
  • Pregnancy;
  • Refusal of consent;
  • Inclusion in other research protocols.

Treatment and study plan

HFNT

Other

High flow nasal therapy

NIV

Other

Noninvasive ventilation

Primary outcomes

  1. Arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2)

    Time frame: 2 hours after randomization

Secondary outcomes

  1. Dyspnea evaluated with Borg dyspnea scale

    Time frame: 2 and 6 hours after randomization

    Borg dyspnea scale: this is a 12-point validated scale that rates patient's difficulty in breathing. It starts at number 0 where breathing causes no difficulty at all and progresses through number 10 where breathing difficulty is maximal

  2. Arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2)

    Time frame: 6 hours after randomization

Other outcomes

  1. Respiratory rate

    Time frame: 2 and 6 hours after randomization

  2. Discontinuation of the interventions

    Time frame: At 6 hours after randomization

    The inability of the patient to continue the treatment while there was still an indication for ventilatory support

  3. Overall discomfort related to the interface

    Time frame: At 6 hours after randomization

  4. Presence of side effects

    Time frame: At 6 hours after randomization

    I.e., complaining for noise or too high temperature of flow, claustrophobia, gastric distension, vomiting, sweating, tightness

  5. Rate of treatment failure

    Time frame: At 6 hours after randomization

    defined as the presence of one or more of the following: arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) reduction, no change or reduction < 10 mmHg from baseline, worsening or no improvement in dyspnoea, respiratory rate > 30 breaths per minute, use of accessory respiratory muscles or paradoxical abdominal movement

  6. Rate of endotracheal intubation

    Time frame: At 6 hours after randomization

    Number of patients requiring endotracheal intubation

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico Paolo Giaccone Palermo

Other

Collaborators

  • Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Mater Domini, Catanzaro

Registry information

Official study title

High Flow Nasal Therapy Versus Noninvasive Ventilation in Mild to Moderate Acute Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure: A Non-inferiority Randomized Trial

Important dates

Study start
2018
Primary completion
2020
Study completion
2020
First posted
Dec 12, 2017
Registry last updated
Apr 30, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.