HFNO
OtherRespiratory support with HFNO (as opposed to NIV, as per standard of care)
NCT Number: NCT06084117
In this pilot study the feasibility of performing a larger trial to study the non-inferiority of High Flow Nasal Oxygen compared to non-invasive ventilation in patients with acute acidotic hypercapnic exacerbation of COPD wil be investigated
Interested in participating?
Request Info40 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Reinier de Graaf, Delft, Netherlands
Rationale: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is frequently complicated by a worsening of symptoms, known as acute exacerbations (AECOPD). These exacerbations can result in a life-threatening condition with an impaired gas exchange, resulting in hypercapnia and as a result respiratory acidosis. The current standard of care of respiratory support for these patients is non-invasive ventilation (NIV), which has been shown to reduce morbidity and mortality. However, NIV is often unsuccessful, due to intolerance, agitation or patient-ventilation dyssynchrony. Furthermore, NIV is a resource-intensive therapy. High flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) is a non-invasive respiratory support mode that provides heated and humidified gas through soft nasal prongs. Several studies have shown that HFNO improves gas exchange and reduces work of breathing in non-hypercapnic respiratory failure. Furthermore, HFNO is thought to be better tolerated than NIV and the nursing effort may be lower compared to NIV. The hypothesis is that HFNO is non-inferior to NIV for patients with acidotic, hypercapnic AECOPD regarding the need for intubation and mortality, and that it increases patient comfort and reduces nursing effort.
Objective: To assess the feasibility of a larger study comparing HFNO with NIV as first line treatment in hypercapnic, acidotic AECOPD.
Study design: prospective, randomized, multi-center, unblinded, pilot study. Study population: Patients with acidotic, hypercapnic AECOPD Intervention (if applicable): HFNO versus NIV as first line treatment at presentation Main study parameters/endpoints: Feasibility: screening rate, inclusion rate, feasibility as qualified by staff and nurses.
Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: All participating patients will receive standard of care (i.e., admission to the monitored ward or ICU for intensive monitoring and regular blood withdrawals, steroids, bronchodilator inhalation therapy). There will be one extra questionnaire after 3 months, but no extra blood samples or site visits, compared to regular care for the participating patients. Permission of the patient will be obtained to register date of hospital discharge and outcome after ICU discharge and ask them to fill out questionnaires at 3 months after admission about their quality of life. Previous studies have not shown that HFNO is inferior to NIV with regards to outcomes (intubation rate, mortality), albeit that they were not powered to prove non-inferiority.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Respiratory support with HFNO (as opposed to NIV, as per standard of care)
Respiratory support with Non-invasive ventilation, standard of care
Time frame: 1 year
Inclusion rate
Time frame: 1 year
Screening rate
Time frame: 1 year
perceived feasibility as qualified by staff and nurses
Time frame: 1 year
protocol deviations
Time frame: 30 days
cross-over, invasive mechanical ventilation, death
Time frame: 30 days
time of respiratory support
Time frame: untill end of ICU admission
use of sedatives, and type of sedation
Time frame: at start, 1, 2, 6, 12, 24 and every 24 hours untill discharge
beats per minute
Time frame: at start, 1, 2, 6, 12, 24 and every 24 hours untill discharge
breaths per minute
Time frame: at start, 1, 2, 6, 12, 24 and every 24 hours untill discharge
systolic and diastolic pressure in mmHg
Time frame: at start, 1, 2, 6, 12, 24 and every 24 hours untill discharge
peripheral saturation by pulsoxymeter (in %)
Time frame: at start, 1, 2, 6, 12, 24 and every 24 hours untill discharge
with pH, PO2, PCO2, bicarbonate
Time frame: at start, 1, 2, 6, 12, 24 and every 24 hours untill discharge
Borg dyspnea score (0-10 on VAS)
Time frame: at start, 1, 2, 6, 12, 24 and every 24 hours untill discharge
heart rate, respiratory rate, blood pressure, Spo2, arterial blood gas, dyspnea score, glasgow coma scale, RASS, seceretions
Time frame: at start, 1, 2, 6, 12, 24 and every 24 hours untill discharge
glasgow coma scale (EMV)
Time frame: at start, 1, 2, 6, 12, 24 and every 24 hours untill discharge
Richmond Agitation and Sedation scale (RASS)
Time frame: at start, 1, 2, 6, 12, 24 and every 24 hours untill discharge
(as 0 (absent), 1 (low quantity), 2 (intermediate), 3 (abundant), or 4 (very abundant) little to normal/abundant)
Time frame: at start, 1, 2, 6, 12, 24 and every 24 hours untill discharge
flow in L/min
Time frame: at start, 1, 2, 6, 12, 24 and every 24 hours untill discharge
FiO2 in %
Time frame: at start, 1, 2, 6, 12, 24 and every 24 hours untill discharge
temperature in Celcius
Time frame: at start, 1, 2, 6, 12, 24 and every 24 hours untill discharge
PEEP in cmH2O
Time frame: at start, 1, 2, 6, 12, 24 and every 24 hours untill discharge
PS in cmH2O
Time frame: at start, 1, 2, 6, 12, 24 and every 24 hours untill discharge
FiO2 in %
Time frame: at start, 1, 2, 6, 12, 24 and every 24 hours untill discharge
10 point VAS scale
Time frame: at start, 1, 2, 6, 12, 24 and every 24 hours untill discharge
calculated from abovementioned parameters (pH, conciousness, PaO2/Fio2, respiratory rate)
Time frame: at start, 1, 2, 6, 12, 24 and every 24 hours untill discharge
scored daily: yes or no, and if yes: grade 1-4
Time frame: first 6 hours of study
respiratory support interventions per 2 hour by peat list
Time frame: at start, 1, 2, 6, 12, 24 and every 24 hours untill discharge
experienced nursing effort at a VAS scale from 1-10
Time frame: 30 days
mortality
Time frame: 90 days
mortality
Time frame: 90 days
EQ5D
Time frame: 90 days
SF-36
Time frame: 90 days
HADS
Time frame: 90 days
IES-R
Time frame: 90 days
IES-R
Time frame: 90 days
CCQ
Time frame: 90 days
MRC
Time frame: during ICU admission
intubation
Time frame: during ICU admission
cross over to NIV from HFNO or from HFNO to NIV
Time frame: during ICU admission
reason of treatment failure: clinical deterioration, failure to improve, other.
Time frame: during ICU admission
worsening of pH, PaCO2, respiratory rate, consiousness, agitation/discomfort, other
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Franciscus Gasthuis
Other
High Flow Nasal Oxygen For Hypercapnic, Acidotic Exacerbation Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Acronym: HiCAP
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06890767
Acute Exacerbation of COPD, Chronic Disease
Genk, Limburg, Belgium
View Trial DetailsNCT05280132
Acute Exacerbation of COPD, Disease
Paris, France
View Trial DetailsNCT07708337
Acute Exacerbation of COPD, COPD
Islamabad, Pakistan
View Trial DetailsNCT06014034
Acute Exacerbation of COPD
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
View Trial Details