Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06084117

High Flow Nasal Oxygen for Exacerbation COPD

In this pilot study the feasibility of performing a larger trial to study the non-inferiority of High Flow Nasal Oxygen compared to non-invasive ventilation in patients with acute acidotic hypercapnic exacerbation of COPD wil be investigated

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

40 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Reinier de Graaf, Delft, Netherlands

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Rationale: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is frequently complicated by a worsening of symptoms, known as acute exacerbations (AECOPD). These exacerbations can result in a life-threatening condition with an impaired gas exchange, resulting in hypercapnia and as a result respiratory acidosis. The current standard of care of respiratory support for these patients is non-invasive ventilation (NIV), which has been shown to reduce morbidity and mortality. However, NIV is often unsuccessful, due to intolerance, agitation or patient-ventilation dyssynchrony. Furthermore, NIV is a resource-intensive therapy. High flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) is a non-invasive respiratory support mode that provides heated and humidified gas through soft nasal prongs. Several studies have shown that HFNO improves gas exchange and reduces work of breathing in non-hypercapnic respiratory failure. Furthermore, HFNO is thought to be better tolerated than NIV and the nursing effort may be lower compared to NIV. The hypothesis is that HFNO is non-inferior to NIV for patients with acidotic, hypercapnic AECOPD regarding the need for intubation and mortality, and that it increases patient comfort and reduces nursing effort.

Objective: To assess the feasibility of a larger study comparing HFNO with NIV as first line treatment in hypercapnic, acidotic AECOPD.

Study design: prospective, randomized, multi-center, unblinded, pilot study. Study population: Patients with acidotic, hypercapnic AECOPD Intervention (if applicable): HFNO versus NIV as first line treatment at presentation Main study parameters/endpoints: Feasibility: screening rate, inclusion rate, feasibility as qualified by staff and nurses.

Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: All participating patients will receive standard of care (i.e., admission to the monitored ward or ICU for intensive monitoring and regular blood withdrawals, steroids, bronchodilator inhalation therapy). There will be one extra questionnaire after 3 months, but no extra blood samples or site visits, compared to regular care for the participating patients. Permission of the patient will be obtained to register date of hospital discharge and outcome after ICU discharge and ask them to fill out questionnaires at 3 months after admission about their quality of life. Previous studies have not shown that HFNO is inferior to NIV with regards to outcomes (intubation rate, mortality), albeit that they were not powered to prove non-inferiority.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Known chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
  • Acute hypercapnic exacerbation of this condition, defined as: PaCO2>45 mmHg or >6.0 kPa and pH 7.20-7.35
  • Age >40 years

Exclusion criteria

  • Asthma
  • Immediate need for intubation, based on clinical judgement of the attending physician.
  • Impossibility to apply either one of the two interventions
  • Patient not expected to give immediate or delayed informed consent (e.g. known cognitive impairment, dementia, active serious psychiatric disease, mental retardation).
  • Established home-NIV or home CPAP, known indication for home-NIV or CPAP (e.g. OSAS or obesitas hypoventilation syndrome).
  • Impeding death
  • Concurrent (respiratory) diseases that may influence treatment efficacy: acute heart infarction, cardiogenic lung edema, massive pulmonary embolism (intermediate-high risk or more). NB; pulmonary infections (viral and bacterial) are a common cause of exacerbation and are no reason for exclusion.
  • Other acute diseases that preclude participation in the trial such as hemodynamic instability (need for vasopressors), reduced consciousness with need for intubation, severe intoxication
  • Tracheostomized patients
  • Participation in other interventional trials
  • Impossibility to admit the patient to the participating ICU or monitored ward (e.g. medium care / high dependency unit, depending on local infrastructure).
  • Previous explicit (or written) objection to participation in research - bicarbonate <20 mmol/L

Treatment and study plan

HFNO

Other

Respiratory support with HFNO (as opposed to NIV, as per standard of care)

NIV

Other

Respiratory support with Non-invasive ventilation, standard of care

Primary outcomes

  1. feasilibity to perform a larger RCT inclusion rate

    Time frame: 1 year

    Inclusion rate

  2. feasibility to perform a larger RCT screening rate

    Time frame: 1 year

    Screening rate

  3. feasibility to perform a larger RCTperceived

    Time frame: 1 year

    perceived feasibility as qualified by staff and nurses

  4. feasibility to perform a larger RCT protocol deviations

    Time frame: 1 year

    protocol deviations

Secondary outcomes

  1. Treatment failure

    Time frame: 30 days

    cross-over, invasive mechanical ventilation, death

  2. duration of intervention

    Time frame: 30 days

    time of respiratory support

  3. need for sedation

    Time frame: untill end of ICU admission

    use of sedatives, and type of sedation

  4. heart rate

    Time frame: at start, 1, 2, 6, 12, 24 and every 24 hours untill discharge

    beats per minute

  5. respiratory rate

    Time frame: at start, 1, 2, 6, 12, 24 and every 24 hours untill discharge

    breaths per minute

  6. blood pressure

    Time frame: at start, 1, 2, 6, 12, 24 and every 24 hours untill discharge

    systolic and diastolic pressure in mmHg

  7. SpO2

    Time frame: at start, 1, 2, 6, 12, 24 and every 24 hours untill discharge

    peripheral saturation by pulsoxymeter (in %)

  8. blood gas

    Time frame: at start, 1, 2, 6, 12, 24 and every 24 hours untill discharge

    with pH, PO2, PCO2, bicarbonate

  9. dyspnea score

    Time frame: at start, 1, 2, 6, 12, 24 and every 24 hours untill discharge

    Borg dyspnea score (0-10 on VAS)

  10. Clinical Parameters

    Time frame: at start, 1, 2, 6, 12, 24 and every 24 hours untill discharge

    heart rate, respiratory rate, blood pressure, Spo2, arterial blood gas, dyspnea score, glasgow coma scale, RASS, seceretions

  11. consciousness

    Time frame: at start, 1, 2, 6, 12, 24 and every 24 hours untill discharge

    glasgow coma scale (EMV)

  12. agitation and sedation level

    Time frame: at start, 1, 2, 6, 12, 24 and every 24 hours untill discharge

    Richmond Agitation and Sedation scale (RASS)

  13. secretions

    Time frame: at start, 1, 2, 6, 12, 24 and every 24 hours untill discharge

    (as 0 (absent), 1 (low quantity), 2 (intermediate), 3 (abundant), or 4 (very abundant) little to normal/abundant)

  14. HFNO ventilatory support parameters flow

    Time frame: at start, 1, 2, 6, 12, 24 and every 24 hours untill discharge

    flow in L/min

  15. HFNO ventilatory support parameters FiO2

    Time frame: at start, 1, 2, 6, 12, 24 and every 24 hours untill discharge

    FiO2 in %

  16. HFNO ventilatory support parameters temperature

    Time frame: at start, 1, 2, 6, 12, 24 and every 24 hours untill discharge

    temperature in Celcius

  17. NIV ventilatory support parameters PEEP

    Time frame: at start, 1, 2, 6, 12, 24 and every 24 hours untill discharge

    PEEP in cmH2O

  18. NIV ventilatory support parameters PS

    Time frame: at start, 1, 2, 6, 12, 24 and every 24 hours untill discharge

    PS in cmH2O

  19. NIV ventilatory support parameters: FiO2

    Time frame: at start, 1, 2, 6, 12, 24 and every 24 hours untill discharge

    FiO2 in %

  20. (dys)comfort score

    Time frame: at start, 1, 2, 6, 12, 24 and every 24 hours untill discharge

    10 point VAS scale

  21. HACOR score

    Time frame: at start, 1, 2, 6, 12, 24 and every 24 hours untill discharge

    calculated from abovementioned parameters (pH, conciousness, PaO2/Fio2, respiratory rate)

  22. facial pressure sores

    Time frame: at start, 1, 2, 6, 12, 24 and every 24 hours untill discharge

    scored daily: yes or no, and if yes: grade 1-4

  23. nursing effort

    Time frame: first 6 hours of study

    respiratory support interventions per 2 hour by peat list

  24. nursing effort VAS

    Time frame: at start, 1, 2, 6, 12, 24 and every 24 hours untill discharge

    experienced nursing effort at a VAS scale from 1-10

  25. 30d mortality

    Time frame: 30 days

    mortality

  26. 90d mortality

    Time frame: 90 days

    mortality

  27. 90d quality of life EQ5D

    Time frame: 90 days

    EQ5D

  28. 90d quality of life SF36

    Time frame: 90 days

    SF-36

  29. 90d anxiety and depression

    Time frame: 90 days

    HADS

  30. 90d PTDS

    Time frame: 90 days

    IES-R

  31. 90d PTSD

    Time frame: 90 days

    IES-R

  32. 90d dyspnea CCQ

    Time frame: 90 days

    CCQ

  33. 90d dyspnea MRC

    Time frame: 90 days

    MRC

  34. need for intubation and mechanical ventilation

    Time frame: during ICU admission

    intubation

  35. need for switch to other modality

    Time frame: during ICU admission

    cross over to NIV from HFNO or from HFNO to NIV

  36. reason of treatment failure

    Time frame: during ICU admission

    reason of treatment failure: clinical deterioration, failure to improve, other.

  37. expression of treatment failure

    Time frame: during ICU admission

    worsening of pH, PaCO2, respiratory rate, consiousness, agitation/discomfort, other

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Dorien Kiers, MD, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+3110 461 6161

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Franciscus Gasthuis

Other

Collaborators

  • Haga Medisch Centrum
  • Ikazia Hospital, Rotterdam
  • Reinier de Graaf Groep

Registry information

Official study title

High Flow Nasal Oxygen For Hypercapnic, Acidotic Exacerbation Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Acronym: HiCAP

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Oct 16, 2023
Registry last updated
Aug 21, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.