Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03460119

High Flow Nasal Cannula in the Emergency Department

The aim of this study was to describe the changes in respiratory rate, heart rate and dyspnea, before and after using HFNC in patients presenting to our emergency department with ARF.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

About this study

A retrospective cohort study was performed. To all adults presenting to the emergency department who used high flow nasal cannula to treat clinical signs of acute respiratory failure based on the presence of a breathing frequency ≥ 25 breath/min and increase work of breathing evidence by dyspnea, in-drawing, accessory-muscle use and/or diaphoresis despite conventional oxygen therapy ≥ 6 l/min. Demographic variables and clinical and gasometric parameters before and after two hours using HFNC were recorded.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • patients aged ≥ 18 years
  • attended between July 1st, 2015 and January 31st , 2017 in the Emergency Department of the Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires
  • with clinical signs of acute respiratory failure

Exclusion criteria

  • Pulse oximetry > 90% breathing room air

Treatment and study plan

High flow nasal cannula oxygen

Device

The high flow device that we used was an air oxygen blender (Whisper FlowⓇ), which allows FiO2 adjustment between 0.30 and 1.0 and can deliver a gas flow from 10 to 150 l/min. The gas mixture was routed from a heated humidifier (MR850 with MR 290 chamber) through a one line heated inspiratory circuit (RT241) to the subject at a temperature of 37°C via a nasal cannula (OptiflowⓇ).

Primary outcomes

  1. Heart Rate

    Time frame: 2 hours

    The closest value of Heart Rate before starting HFNC, and two hours later was collected from the electronic clinical history.

  2. Respiratory Rate

    Time frame: 2 hours

    The closest value of Respiratory Rate before starting HFNC, and two hours later was collected from the electronic clinical history.

  3. Dyspnea

    Time frame: 2 hours

    The closest value of Dyspnea (Modified Borg Dyspnea scale) before starting HFNC, and two hours later was collected from the electronic clinical history. The Modified Borg Dyspnea Scale is a rated numerical score used to measure dyspnea. This scale has a minimum value of 0 ( represent no dyspnea) and a maximum value of 10 (worse dyspnea).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Initial HFNC setting

    Time frame: 2 hours

    The gas flow rate and the fraction of inspired oxygen at the HFNC initiation of treatment were collected from the electronic clinical history.

  2. Acute respiratory failure etiology

    Time frame: 3 minutes

    Presence of a breathing frequency ≥ 25 breath/min and increase work of breathing evidence by dyspnea, in-drawing, accessory-muscle use and/or diaphoresis despite conventional oxygen therapy ≥ 6 l/min.

  3. Average time of use the HFNC

    Time frame: until 28 days

    The total hours of use of HFNC were collected from the electronic clinical history.

  4. Delay of HFNC treatment

    Time frame: until 24hs

    The hours between the admission to HFNC initiation were collected from the electronic clinical history.

  5. Efficacy of HFNC treatment

    Time frame: 28 days

    When the patient did not need for escalation to other non-invasive or invasive ventilatory support.

  6. Failure of HFNC treatment

    Time frame: 28 days

    When the patient need non-invasive or invasive ventilatory support or died. The type of ventilatory support post-failure were collected from the electronic clinical history.

  7. Mortality rate at 28 day from ED admission

    Time frame: 28 days

    The number of patients who died after requiring HFNCO were collected from the electronic clinical history

  8. Palliative Care

    Time frame: 28 days

    Consensus between patient and/or patient´s family and the physician about the care for the terminally ill patient, provided by an organized health service

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Use of High-Flow Nasal Cannula for Acute Respiratory Failure in the Emergency Department

Acronym: HFNC

Important dates

Study start
2015
Primary completion
2017
Study completion
2017
First posted
Mar 9, 2018
Registry last updated
Mar 9, 2018

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.