Bach Mai Hospital, Hanoi, Viet Nam.
Hanoi, 00000, Vietnam
NCT Number: NCT07664085
Patients with acute brain injury after neurosurgery are at increased risk of extubation failure after removal of the endotracheal tube. High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) may provide better post-extubation respiratory support than conventional oxygen therapy (COT), but evidence in post-neurosurgical patients remains limited.
This prospective observational study evaluated adult post-neurosurgical patients with acute brain injury who underwent planned extubation in the Surgical Intensive Care Unit of Bach Mai Hospital, Vietnam. Patients received either HFNC or COT after extubation according to routine clinical practice and the decision of the attending ICU physicians. The primary outcome was treatment failure, defined as reintubation or escalation of respiratory support within 5 days after extubation. Secondary outcomes included tracheostomy, ventilator-associated pneumonia, ICU length of stay, total duration of mechanical ventilation, and time from extubation to reintubation. Propensity score matching was used to reduce baseline imbalance between groups.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me16 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Hanoi, 00000, Vietnam
Extubation failure is a clinically important complication in patients with acute brain injury after neurosurgery. These patients may have impaired consciousness, weak cough, reduced airway protection, and limited respiratory reserve, which can increase the risk of reintubation and other postoperative pulmonary complications. High-flow nasal cannula provides heated and humidified oxygen at high flow rates and may improve oxygenation, reduce work of breathing, and support airway clearance after extubation.
This study was designed as a prospective observational cohort study conducted in the Surgical Intensive Care Unit of Bach Mai Hospital. Adult patients aged 16 years or older who were admitted after neurosurgery for acute brain injury, required invasive mechanical ventilation for at least 24 hours, successfully completed a spontaneous breathing trial, had adequate airway protection, and underwent planned extubation were consecutively enrolled. The choice of post-extubation oxygen therapy was not assigned by the investigators. Patients received either HFNC or conventional oxygen therapy according to the attending ICU physician's clinical decision and routine ICU practice.
In the HFNC group, HFNC was initiated immediately after planned extubation when selected by the treating physician. The initial flow rate was 60 L/min, and FiO2 was titrated to maintain SpO2 between 95% and 100%. HFNC was planned for at least the first 24 hours after extubation and was subsequently weaned according to clinical tolerance. In the conventional oxygen therapy group, oxygen was delivered through a standard nasal cannula or face mask, with oxygen flow adjusted to maintain the same SpO2 target.
Clinical data, respiratory parameters, neurological status, arterial blood gas results, oxygen therapy settings, escalation of respiratory support, reintubation, tracheostomy, ventilator-associated pneumonia, duration of mechanical ventilation, and ICU length of stay were collected from ICU medical records, bedside monitoring charts, and nursing or respiratory therapy documentation.
The primary outcome was treatment failure, defined as reintubation or escalation of respiratory support within 5 days after extubation. Secondary outcomes included tracheostomy during ICU stay, ventilator-associated pneumonia, ICU length of stay, total duration of mechanical ventilation, and time from extubation to reintubation. Propensity score matching was performed to reduce selection bias between the HFNC and conventional oxygen therapy groups. Matching variables included age, sex, body mass index, diagnosis category, Glasgow Coma Scale score, airway protection status, duration of mechanical ventilation, and baseline gas exchange variables.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: Within 5 days after planned extubation
Treatment failure was defined as reintubation or escalation of respiratory support after planned extubation. Escalation of respiratory support included the need for non-invasive ventilation, rescue high-flow nasal cannula therapy in the conventional oxygen therapy group, or other clinically indicated escalation due to respiratory deterioration. Outcome assessment was based on bedside clinical monitoring, arterial blood gas analysis, respiratory status, neurological status, airway protection assessment, and ICU medical record review.
Time frame: From planned extubation through ICU discharge, assessed up to 30 days after planned extubation
The proportion of patients who required tracheostomy after planned extubation. Tracheostomy was identified by review of ICU medical records, operative or procedure notes, and hospital documentation.
Time frame: From planned extubation through ICU discharge, assessed up to 30 days after planned extubation
Ventilator-associated pneumonia was assessed by review of hospital medical records using predefined clinical, radiographic, and microbiological criteria, including clinical examination, chest radiograph findings, and microbiological culture results.
Time frame: From ICU admission through ICU discharge, assessed up to 30 days after ICU admission
ICU length of stay was calculated using the recorded dates and times of ICU admission and ICU discharge from ICU charts and hospital medical records.
Time frame: From planned extubation through reintubation, assessed up to 5 days after planned extubation
Time from planned extubation to reintubation was calculated from the recorded date and time of extubation to the recorded date and time of re-insertion of the endotracheal tube. Patients who were not reintubated were censored at 5 days after extubation.
Bach Mai Hospital
Other
High-Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Conventional Oxygen Therapy After Extubation in Mechanically Ventilated Patients With Acute Brain Injury: A Propensity-Score Overlap-Weighted Observational Cohort Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07526701
Acute Brain Injury, Brain Diseases
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
View Trial DetailsNCT04459884
Acute Brain Injury, Brain Diseases
Monza, MB, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT06393049
Acute Brain Injury, Brain Diseases
Copenhagen, Denmark
View Trial DetailsNCT06074406
Acute Brain Injury, Brain Diseases
Kansas City, Missouri, United States
View Trial Details