Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT05043116

High-dose Vitamin D Supplement for the Prevention of Acute Asthma-like Symptoms in Preschool Children

To investigate whether high-dose vitamin D supplementation may have a beneficial effect on secondary prevention in preschool children (1-5 years of age), with respiratory infections being the primary cause of acute exacerbations with asthma-like symptoms.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

12 month–71 month

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

University Hospital of Copenhagen

Gentofte Municipality, Gentofte, 2820, Denmark

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Bo Chawes, MD, DMSc, PhD

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Klaus Bønnelykke, MD, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+45 38677360

Ulrik Ralfkiaer, MSc, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+4538674164

About this study

Asthma is a chronic inflammatory disease of the airways with a variable, reversible airway obstruction and hyper-reactivity in the airways. The disease results in intermittent episodes with asthma-like symptoms such as difficulty breathing with wheezing, dyspnoea, chest tightness and coughing. These episodes occur in connection with upper respiratory tract infections, physical activity and can be triggered by airborne allergens and by high particle load in the environment, including pollutants and tobacco smoke. The prevalence of asthma has more than doubled in the Western world, as well as in the societies that have embraced the Western world in recent decades. Currently, half of younger children experience asthma-like symptoms, 20% have recurrent symptoms, and by school age, 10% of children are diagnosed with asthma. Asthma and asthma-like symptoms are currently the primary cause of chronic use of medication and hospitalization of younger children, and have a major negative impact on children and their families, and also carry a significant socio-economic burden on society.

Preschool children who suffer from asthma and asthma-like symptoms have the highest rate of acute visits to a child's clinic compared to older children with asthma, and one in three requires real hospitalization in this regard. Most acute exacerbations with asthma-like symptoms in younger children are triggered by viral or bacterial upper respiratory tract infections, which are associated with poorer response to oral corticosteroids (OCS). OCS is currently one of the few options for the treatment of exacerbations in younger children (tertiary prevention). Preventive inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) as monotherapy or with the addition of oral leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA) is effective in achieving daily symptom control in preschool children with asthma and asthma-like symptoms (secondary prevention). However, up to 50% still experience acute exacerbations with asthma-like symptoms that require OCS treatment and / or hospitalization. At present, there are no official clinical guidelines describing step-up treatment with regard to to improve secondary prevention; in particular, there is a lack of intervention opportunities with regard to to reduce the high morbidity associated with acute asthma-like symptoms, which is therefore a major deficiency in the clinical management of this age group of vulnerable children.

Previous trials with vitamin D supplements A systematic review with 2016 meta-analysis, involving randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) of vitamin D supplementation for patients with asthma, showed that vitamin D supplementation significantly reduced the rate of acute exacerbations requiring OCS by 36% (relative rate (RR) 0.64, 658 adults / 22 preschool children) and acute visits to child reception or real hospitalizations with 61% (odds ratio (OR) 0.39, 664 adults / 277 school children / 22 preschool children). As there are few RCTs, and in these there is an under-representation of preschool children, great heterogeneity in vitamin D dose and concomitant ICS therapy, there was not enough power in the meta-analysis to examine subgroup differences, especially among younger children. It is therefore still unclear about patient characteristics such as age, baseline level of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD), genetic variations in vitamin D metabolism and / or treatment characteristics such as vitamin D treatment plan, including e.g. use of bolus versus no bolus, duration of treatment and form of administration influence the extent of the positive effect of vitamin D on acute asthma-like symptoms.

Pediatric RCTs have subsequently been performed, but none that have included preschool children. Currently, there are 7 published pediatric studies with relatively few included trial participants (n = 22-430). In the currently published RCTs, there is only one where the included children are of preschool age, which is a pilot study on the safety of vitamin D treatment of acute viral-induced asthma (DIVA). In the DIVA pilot study, 22 preschool children were randomized to an oral bolus of vitamin D of 100,000 international units (IU) (~ 250 μg) plus 400 IU / day (~ 10 μg / day) for 6 months or placebo. The treatment was safe and resulted in significantly increased serum 25OHD to a level> 75 nmol / L. However, the study did not have enough power to show a difference in acute doctor visits based on acute asthma-like symptoms. Apart from the so-called DIVA RCT (NCT03365687), there are no other registered RCTs regarding vitamin D supplementation for preschool children with acute asthma-like symptoms registered on clinicaltrials.gov. Therefore, there is a need for a study that includes preschoolers who have enough power to show whether vitamin D supplementation improves the secondary prevention of acute asthma-like symptoms by reducing the number of exacerbations and the need for OCS and / or hospitalization, independent of baseline serum 25OHD levels.

Potential mechanisms of vitamin D in acute asthma-like symptoms It is important to investigate the potential mechanisms of action of the possible protective role of vitamin D against acute asthma-like symptoms. These may be dependent on specific asthma phenotypes where vitamin D supplementation is more effective. A subgroup analysis from a 2017 meta-analysis of individual participant data from 25 RCTs showed that vitamin D supplementation significantly reduced the risk of acute upper respiratory tract infections by 40% (OR 0.60; 513 children) in a group of children aged 1- Sixteen years. This may suggest that vitamin D supplementation in particular may have a beneficial effect on secondary prevention in preschool children, with respiratory infections being the primary cause of acute exacerbations with asthma-like symptoms. Vitamin D coordinates the functions of the immune system both by inducing and by inhibiting inflammation as well as by modulating inflammatory and anti-inflammatory effects of the cells of the immune system. In most tissues exposed to infection or an allergen, the expression of the enzyme CYP27B1, which converts 25OHD to the active 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D, is induced. The active 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D binds to the vitamin D receptor (VDR), which regulates the transcription of many genes, including several associated with the smooth muscle cells of the bronchi, which may explain the observed association between serum 25OHD and airway reactivity. A study involving a similar patient group of infants with acute asthma symptoms found that gene expression was associated with vitamin D levels and was a predictor of later asthma, supporting the hypothesis that vitamin D plays a role in asthma at this age and that gene Expression can be an important biomarker for the effect of treatment. An immunomodulatory and synergistic effect of vitamin D on ICS treatment response and thus on airway inflammation may also be present, which is supported by observational studies.

Bone health status improves when serum 25OHD is> 75 nmol / L, which is equivalent to sufficient vitamin D status. However, the 25OHD threshold for optimal immunological, anti-inflammatory and respiratory function is unknown, but it is likely to be higher. In addition, genetic variation in the GC gene, which encodes vitamin D binding protein, plays a role in the level of 25OHD in the blood, which thus plays a role in the amount of vitamin D available in the target tissue. Research into vitamin D levels and the impact of immunological and inflammatory processes will increase the understanding of the mechanisms of action on acute asthma-like symptoms.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

The study population consists of children in the age group 1-5 years admitted to a pediatric ward, due to an acute episode with asthma-like symptoms. An acute asthma-like episode will be defined as annoying coughing, wheezing (wheezing or wheezing in connection with exhalation) and / or dyspnoea, which affects the child's well-being and requires hospitalization in a pediatric ward. Participation in the study requires that the child is in or has been in treatment with SABA, as monotherapy, or in combination with ICS, and possibly also in combination with LTRA in accordance with the Danish guidelines

Exclusion criteria

  • The child is hospitalized with pneumonia
  • The child's daily intake of vitamin D supplementation is> 400 IU / day (~ 10 μg / day).
  • The child is given a combination of vitamin and dietary supplements containing vitamin D, thus the daily recommended dose is exceeded, as 2400 IU / day (~ 60 μg / day) is accepted for children aged 1-4 years, as everyone here is recommended to take 400 IU / day (~ 10 μg / day) by the Danish Health and Medicines Authority.
  • The baby has been exclusively breastfed for the past 6 months.
  • The child is malnourished
  • for children> 2 years of age whose age-specific BMI is less than the 3rd percentile.
  • for children <2 years, whose weight or height in relation to age is less than the 3rd percentile.
  • The child is a newly arrived refugee or immigrant from regions with a high risk of rickets.
  • The child has other chronic lung diseases.
  • The child is diagnosed with other conditions such as chronic lung disease, impaired renal function, neurological or psychiatric disorders, congenital or documented acquired QT prolongation, clinically relevant bradycardia, cardiac arrhythmia or severe heart failure and / or hepatic impairment.
  • The child is being treated with medication that alters calcium or vitamin D absorption / metabolism.

Treatment and study plan

Cholecalciferol D3

Dietary Supplement

2000 IU of Vitamin D provided as oral suspension for one year

Other names: Vitamin D from Apovit, Denmark

Oral placebo suspension

Other

Oral suspension with no active substance tasting like the active supplement.

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of acute exacerbations

    Time frame: One year

    The primary objective of this double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial is to determine whether an oral daily dose of 2000 IU (~ 50 μg) of vitamin D administered for a total of 12 months versus placebo leads to: Decrease in the number of acute exacerbations with asthma-like symptoms that require treatment with OCS and / or lead to hospitalization / treatment at a pediatric clinic.

    This in children aged 1-5 years with a medical history with asthma-like symptoms, and is in or has received treatment with SABA as monotherapy, or in combination ICS and possibly also LTRA.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Intervention with vitamin D versus placebo, time to first acute exacerbation

    Time frame: One year

    Change in time (days) to first acute exacerbation with asthma-like symptoms requiring OCS and / or hospitalization / treatment at a pediatric ward.

  2. Intervention with vitamin D versus placebo, duration of symptoms

    Time frame: One year

    Change of the duration (days) of symptoms / hospitalization.

  3. Intervention with vitamin D versus placebo, need for medical treatment

    Time frame: One year

    Change in the need for medical treatment during exacerbations, including SABA, short-acting anticholinergic inhalations (SAMA) and OCS.

  4. Intervention with vitamin D versus placebo, daily symptom burden

    Time frame: One year

    Change in the daily symptom burden between exacerbations.

  5. Intervention with vitamin D versus placebo, step-down of preventive treatment

    Time frame: One year

    Is the intervention associated with successful step-down of preventive medical asthma treatment.

  6. Safety profile of vitamin D intervention, calcium levels in blood

    Time frame: One year

    This study also aims to examine the safety profile of vitamin D intervention. This is done by examining group differences in the proportion of children with clinically significant:

    • Hypo-calcemia (defined as total β-calcium below 2.20 mmol / l after correction for albumin)
    • Hyper-calcemia (defined as total β-calcium above 2.55 mmol / l after correction for albumin)
  7. Safety profile of vitamin D intervention, calcium levels in urine

    Time frame: One year

    This study also aims to examine the safety profile of vitamin D intervention. This is done by examining group differences in the proportion of children with clinically significant:

    ● Hyper-calciuri as defined by Ca/creatinine-ratio in urine with a value above 1,0 mmol/mmol

  8. Safety profile of vitamin D intervention, serum 25OHD level

    Time frame: One year

    This study also aims to examine the safety profile of vitamin D intervention. This is done by examining group differences in the proportion of children with clinically significant serum 25OHD> 250 nmol / L.

  9. Safety profile of vitamin D intervention, Adverse Events

    Time frame: One year

    This study also aims to examine the safety profile of vitamin D intervention. This is done by examining group differences in the proportion of children with clinically significant incidence(s) of Adverse Events.

  10. Exploratory outcomes, baseline 25OHD

    Time frame: One year

    Analyzing baseline serum 25OHD (mol / L).

  11. Exploratory outcomes, genetic variation in VDR

    Time frame: One year

    Analyzing genetic variation of the Vitamin D Receptor gene (VDR).

  12. Exploratory outcomes, genetic variation in VDBP

    Time frame: One year

    Analyzing genetic variation of the Vitamin D Binding Protein gene (VDBP).

  13. Exploratory outcomes, expression levels of genes involved in the vitamin D metabolism

    Time frame: One year

    Analyzing expression in vitamin D metabolism related to VDR and Vitamin D binding protein (VDBP) and other relevant candidates in the vitamin D processing pathway.

  14. Exploratory outcomes, expression levels of asthma-related genes

    Time frame: One year

    Analyzing expression levels in known asthma-related genes, e.g. 17q21 and other relevant genes.

  15. Exploratory outcomes, genetic variation in asthma-related genes

    Time frame: One year

    Analyzing genetic variation in known asthma-related genes, e.g. 17q21 and other relevant genes.

  16. Exploratory outcomes, respiratory microbiome, conventional culture

    Time frame: One year

    Alpha- and beta Diversity of gut microbiota using conventional culturing assays.

  17. Exploratory outcomes, respiratory microbiome

    Time frame: One year

    Alpha- and beta diversity of gut microbiota using 16S rRNA sequencing and whole genome sequencing.

  18. Exploratory outcomes, respiratory virus detection

    Time frame: One year

    Alpha- and beta diversity of vira using targeted q-PCR.

  19. Exploratory outcomes, respiratory immune profile, blood eosinophilocyte counts

    Time frame: One year

    Measuring blood eosinophilocyte counts for inhalation allergens.

  20. Exploratory outcomes, respiratory immune profile, total-IgE

    Time frame: One year

    The study also aims to examine a wide range of exploratory outcomes to gain insight into the mechanisms of action behind the effects of vitamin D supplementation and possible effect modification, which can help identify children with particularly high effects of treatment, by analyzing the respiratory immune profile at the time of inclusion. Atopic status by measuring total-IgE for inhalation allergens.

  21. Exploratory outcomes, respiratory immune profile, specific-IgE

    Time frame: One year

    The study also aims to examine a wide range of exploratory outcomes to gain insight into the mechanisms of action behind the effects of vitamin D supplementation and possible effect modification, which can help identify children with particularly high effects of treatment, by analyzing the respiratory immune profile at the time of inclusion.

    ● Atopic status by measuring specific-IgE levels for inhalation allergens.

  22. Exploratory outcomes, atopic status, measuring blood eosinophilocyte counts

    Time frame: One year

    The study also aims to examine a wide range of exploratory outcomes to gain insight into the mechanisms of action behind the effects of vitamin D supplementation and possible effect modification, which can help identify children with particularly high effects of treatment, by analyzing the atopic status by measuring blood eosinophilocyte counts, for inhalation allergens.

  23. Exploratory outcomes, atopic status, total-IgE and specific-IgE levels

    Time frame: One year

    The study also aims to examine a wide range of exploratory outcomes to gain insight into the mechanisms of action behind the effects of vitamin D supplementation and possible effect modification, which can help identify children with particularly high effects of treatment, by analyzing the atopic status by measuring total-IgE and specific-IgE levels for inhalation allergens.

  24. COVID-19 risk and Vitamin-D

    Time frame: One year

    Does the vitamin-D intervention decrease the risk of COVID-19 infection, as determined by PCR test.

  25. COVID-19 symptom burden and Vitamin-D

    Time frame: One year

    Does D-vitamin supplementation change the symptom burden (in number of days) of COVID-19 infection, as determined by PCR test.

  26. COVID-19 infection length and Vitamin-D

    Time frame: One year

    Does D-vitamin supplementation change length (number of days) of COVID-19 infection, as determined by PCR test.

  27. Daycare absence

    Time frame: One year

    Does D-vitamin supplementation change number of days absent from daycare.

  28. Health economic benefits

    Time frame: One year

    Does D-vitamin supplementation change the number of days parents need to stay home to look after their children when they are absent from daycare.

  29. Remission since inclusion

    Time frame: One Year

    Does D-vitamin supplementation increase the remission rate after one year?

  30. Severity based on number of prescriptions

    Time frame: One year

    Does D-vitamin supplementation decrease the number of prescriptions after one year

  31. Severity based on number of step-up treatments

    Time frame: One year

    Does D-vitamin supplementation decrease the number of step-up treatments (stronger topical or biological treatment) after one year

  32. Effect on AD remission and severity after 1 year of vitamin D supplementation

    Time frame: One year

    • AD remission or a decline in severity by investigating number of prescriptions during the 1-year study period and 2) potential change of treatment steps i.e. from biological treatment or strong topical steroids to less potent steroids.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Klaus Bønnelykke, MD, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+4538677360

Ulrik Ralfkiaer, MSc, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+4538674164

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Copenhagen Studies on Asthma in Childhood

Other

Registry information

Official study title

High-dose Vitamin D Supplement for the Prevention of Acute Asthma-like Symptoms in Preschool Children - a Double-blind, Randomized, Controlled Trial

Acronym: COPSACvitd

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2028
Study completion
2031
First posted
Sep 14, 2021
Registry last updated
Apr 16, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.