Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01664130

High-Dose Stereotactic Radiation for Prostate Cancer

This clinical trial studies high-dose stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in treating patients with low-, intermediate-, or high-risk localized prostate cancer. SBRT may be able to send x-rays directly to the tumor and cause less damage to normal tissue

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

Male

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center

Cleveland, Ohio, 44195, United States

About this study

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To assess treatment related gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity for patients who undergo SBRT for localized prostate cancer.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. Follow quality of life after SBRT using Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) and American Urological Association (AUA) scores.

II. Assess biochemical control after high-dose SBRT.

OUTLINE:

Patients undergo 5 fractions of prostate stereotactic body radiation therapy over 10-12 days with at least 40 hours between each fraction in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 1.5, 4, 8, and 12 months, every 6 months for 4 years, and then annually thereafter.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • The patient must have prostate adenocarcinoma proven by histologic diagnosis
  • The patient must have clinical stage T1a-T3b with localized prostate cancer considered low, intermediate, or high risk as defined by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines; any patient whom is defined as high-risk must undergo screening with computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the abdomen and pelvis as well as bone scan prior to enrollment for staging purposes; low and intermediate risk patients do not require imaging for staging unless they have a focal symptom warranting investigation
  • Performance status - Karnofsky performance status (PS) >= 70
  • Life expectancy of > 5 years, in the opinion of and as documented by the investigator
  • Patients must either already have fiducials already placed within the prostate, or otherwise be candidates for prostate fiducial placement (no bleeding disorders which may cause excessive bleeding with fiducial placement, INR < 2.0).
  • Patients must have prostate-specific antigen (PSA) drawn within the 90 days prior to enrollment
  • Men must agree to use adequate contraception (double barrier method of birth control or abstinence) for the duration of study participation and for 12 months after completing treatment
  • Subjects must have the ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document

Exclusion criteria

  • Prior treatment toxicities must be resolved to =< grade 1 according to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0
  • Patients who are receiving any other investigational agents
  • Evidence of metastatic disease prior to radiation
  • Patients with uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to ongoing or active infection, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmia, or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements
  • Prior pelvic radiation therapy
  • Patients whom are planned to receive pelvic nodal radiation are excluded
  • Weight > 350 lbs
  • Contraindications to placement of fiducials required for high-precision image guidance (e.g. bleeding disorders which may cause excessive bleeding with placement, requirement for coumadin, international normalized ratio [INR] > 2.0)
  • Patients unable to maintain a full bladder during treatment
  • Previous prostatectomy
  • Inflammatory bowel disease
  • AUA score > 15 in spite of optimal therapy

Treatment and study plan

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy

Radiation

Undergo SBRT

Other names: SBRT, stereotactic radiation therapy, stereotactic radiotherapy

quality-of-life assessment

Procedure

Ancillary studies

Other names: quality of life assessment

laboratory biomarker analysis

Other

Correlative studies

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Patients With Treatment Related GI and/or GU Toxicity as Assessed by the NCI CTCTAE Version 4.0

    Time frame: 1.5 months

    Number of patients with excessive GI and/or GU toxicity, defined as a grade 3 GU toxicity rate of ≥15% according to the NCI CTCTAE version 4.0

  2. Number of Patients With Treatment Related GI and GU Toxicity as Assessed by the NCI CTCTAE Version 4.0

    Time frame: 4 months

    Number of patients with excessive GI and/or GU toxicity, defined as a grade 3 GU toxicity rate of ≥15% according to the NCI CTCTAE version 4.0

  3. Number of Patients With Treatment Related GI and GU Toxicity as Assessed by the NCI CTCTAE Version 4.0

    Time frame: 8 months

    Number of patients with excessive GI and/or GU toxicity, defined as a grade 3 GU toxicity rate of ≥15% according to the NCI CTCTAE version 4.0

  4. Number of Patients With Treatment Related GI and GU Toxicity as Assessed by the NCI CTCTAE Version 4.0

    Time frame: 12 months

    Number of patients with excessive GI and/or GU toxicity, defined as a grade 3 GU toxicity rate of ≥15% according to the NCI CTCTAE version 4.0

Secondary outcomes

  1. Quality of Life as Assessed by EPIC Scores

    Time frame: Baseline and 1.5 months

    Quality of life (QOL) from baseline as assessed by scores of the EPIC Questionnaire. Scores for each domain (urinary incontinence, bowel, sexual, hormonal) range from 0-100, with higher scores indicating better clinical assessment.

  2. Quality of Life as Assessed by EPIC Scores

    Time frame: Baseline and 4 months

    Quality of life (QOL) from baseline as assessed by scores of the EPIC Questionnaire. Scores for each domain (urinary incontinence, bowel, sexual, hormonal) range from 0-100, with higher scores indicating better clinical assessment.

  3. Quality of Life as Assessed by EPIC Scores

    Time frame: Baseline and 8 months

    Quality of life (QOL) from baseline as assessed by scores of the EPIC Questionnaire. Scores for each domain (urinary incontinence, bowel, sexual, hormonal) range from 0-100, with higher scores indicating better clinical assessment.

  4. Quality of Life as Assessed by EPIC Scores

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 months

    Quality of life (QOL) from baseline as assessed by scores of the EPIC Questionnaire. Scores for each domain (urinary incontinence, bowel, sexual, hormonal) range from 0-100, with higher scores indicating better clinical assessment.

  5. Quality of Life as Assessed by Change in AUA Scores

    Time frame: Baseline and 1.5 months

    Quality of life (QOL) as assessed by changes in AUA scores ranging between 0 to 35, with higher scores indicating a worse clinical assessment.

  6. Quality of Life as Assessed by Change in AUA Scores

    Time frame: Baseline and 4 months

    Quality of life (QOL) as assessed by changes in AUA scores ranging between 0 to 35, with higher scores indicating a worse clinical assessment.

  7. Quality of Life as Assessed by Change in AUA Scores

    Time frame: Baseline and 8 months

    Quality of life (QOL) as assessed by changes in AUA scores ranging between 0 to 35, with higher scores indicating a worse clinical assessment.

  8. Quality of Life as Assessed by Change in AUA Scores

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 months

    Quality of life (QOL) as assessed by changes in AUA scores ranging between 0 to 35, with higher scores indicating a worse clinical assessment.

  9. Percentage of Participants With Biochemical Relapse Free Survival as Measured by Serum PSA

    Time frame: Baseline and 1.5 months

    Percentage of Participants with biochemical failure. Biochemical failure is defined as a rise in PSA of 2.0 ng/dl above the post-treatment nadir.

  10. Percentage of Participants With Biochemical Relapse Free Survival as Measured by Serum PSA

    Time frame: Baseline and 4 months

    Biochemical failure will be defined as a rise in PSA of 2.0 ng/dl above the post-treatment nadir.

  11. Percentage of Participants With Biochemical Relapse Free Survival as Measured by Serum PSA

    Time frame: Baseline and 8 months

    Biochemical failure will be defined as a rise in PSA of 2.0 ng/dl above the post-treatment nadir.

  12. Percentage of Participants With Biochemical Relapse Free Survival as Measured by Serum PSA

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 months

    Percent measurement of biochemical failure will be defined as a rise in PSA of 2.0 ng/dl above the post-treatment nadir.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Case Comprehensive Cancer Center

Other

Collaborators

  • National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Registry information

Official study title

High-Dose Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Low-, Intermediate-, or High-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer

Important dates

Study start
2012
Primary completion
2017
Study completion
2017
First posted
Aug 14, 2012
Registry last updated
May 21, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.