Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03263442

High Dose Intravenous Thiamine for the Prevention of Delirium in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Purpose: To conduct a randomized controlled pilot study investigating the use of high dose intravenous (IV) thiamine to prevent delirium and mitigate the long-term effects of delirium, including health-related quality of life (HRQOL), functional status, and neuropsychiatric outcomes, in patients admitted to University of North Carolina (UNC) Hospital for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT).

Participants: 60 adult inpatients admitted to the UNC Bone Marrow Transplant Unit for allogeneic stem cell transplant.

Procedures (methods): Participants will be admitted for allogeneic HSCT and on the day after transplant randomized to seven days of high dose IV thiamine or placebo. Thiamine levels will be measured weekly and participants will be assessed for evidence of delirium using validated measures. Validated measures will also be used to assess cognitive function, depression, post-traumatic stress symptoms, functional status, and HRQOL prior to hospitalization and at one, three, and six months after transplant.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Avitaminosis Confusion Deficiency Diseases Delirium Malnutrition Mental Disorders Nervous System Diseases Neurobehavioral Manifestations Neurocognitive Disorders Neurologic Manifestations Nutrition Disorders Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms Signs and Symptoms Thiamine Deficiency Vitamin B Deficiency

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27514, United States

About this study

Delirium is a common and potentially preventable neuropsychiatric complication in cancer patients receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) that has profound consequences. Among cancer patients hospitalized for HSCT, delirium occurs in approximately 40% of patients and increases the risk of mortality. Long-term, delirium in this population results in worse physical health, mental health, and quality of life. Though strategies to prevent delirium have the potential to significantly improve the lives of people living with cancer, research in this area is extremely limited. Thiamine deficiency is also ubiquitous during HSCT and a known contributor to the development of delirium in other patient populations. High dose intravenous (IV) thiamine is an evidence-based and promising treatment for delirium, but no one has studied IV thiamine as a prevention strategy.

This is a randomized double-blind controlled trial in participants undergoing allogeneic HSCT to determine if high dose IV thiamine can prevent delirium and minimize the deleterious impact of delirium on health-related quality of life (HRQOL), functional status, and other neuropsychiatric outcomes. The investigators will recruit 60 patients admitted for allogeneic HSCT at UNC, randomize them to treatment with high dose IV thiamine (n = 30) versus placebo (n = 30), and systematically evaluate all participants for delirium and related comorbidities. The investigators will use the Delirium Rating Scale (DRS) to measure the severity and duration of delirium immediately prior to transplant and after HSCT until 30 days post-transplant or discharge. If delirium is identified, the DRS will be administered daily until delirium resolves. The investigators will obtain thiamine levels and other laboratory parameters associated with delirium the day after transplant, and continue to monitor thiamine levels weekly thereafter. The investigators will also monitor HRQOL, functional status, depression, post-traumatic stress symptoms, and cognitive function prior to transplant and at one, three, and six months after transplant to elucidate the persistent impact of delirium in this population and the potential for thiamine to mitigate these negative outcomes.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Admission to the UNC Hospital Bone Marrow Transplant Unit for allogeneic stem cell transplant
  • At least 18 years of age
  • Able to speak English
  • Able to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • A history of adverse reaction to IV thiamine
  • Pregnancy, confirmed by a negative pregnancy test within 30 days of study enrollment

Treatment and study plan

Thiamine

Drug

200 mg IV three times daily for seven days

Other names: Thiamine Hydrochloride Injection

normal saline

Drug

Normal saline IV three times daily for seven days

Other names: Placebo

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Delirium

    Time frame: Assessments will occur in the week prior to transplant, then 3 times weekly post-transplant until 30 days post-transplant or discharge, whichever comes first.

    Delirium incidence will be measured using the Delirium Rating Scale (DRS). The DRS is a is a 10-item, clinician-rated scale that rates the severity of delirium symptoms over a 24-hour period using all available information from the patient interview, mental status examination, medical history and tests, nursing observations, and family reports. The maximum possible score is 32. Higher scores suggest more severe symptoms. A cut-off score of > 12 has been suggested to distinguish patients with delirium from patients with other neuropsychiatric disorders. Delirium incidence will be defined as at least one assessment with DRS > 12.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Delirium Severity

    Time frame: Assessments will occur in the week prior to transplant (baseline), then at least 3 times post-transplant on a weekly basis until 30 days post-transplant or discharge, whichever comes first, up to week 5

    Delirium severity will be measured using the Delirium Rating Scale (DRS). The DRS is a is a 10-item, clinician-rated scale that rates the severity of delirium symptoms over a 24-hour period using all available information from the patient interview, mental status examination, medical history and tests, nursing observations, and family reports. The score ranges from 0 to 32 with higher scores reflecting more severe symptoms. A cut-off score of > 12 has been suggested to distinguish patients with delirium from patients with other neuropsychiatric disorders. The DRS medians and ranges are reported for each group at baseline and in each week of hospitalization for thiamine and placebo groups.

  2. Delirium Duration

    Time frame: Assessments will occur in the week prior to transplant, then 3 times weekly post-transplant until 30 days post-transplant or discharge, whichever comes first.

    Delirium duration will be measured using the Delirium Rating Scale (DRS). The DRS is a is a 10-item, clinician-rated scale that rates the severity of delirium symptoms over a 24-hour period using all available information from the patient interview, mental status examination, medical history and tests, nursing observations, and family reports. The maximum possible score is 32. Higher scores suggest more severe symptoms. A cut-off score of > 12 has been suggested to distinguish patients with delirium from patients with other neuropsychiatric disorders. Delirium duration will be reported as number of consecutive days during which DRS > 12.

  3. Concentration of Thiamine Status Stratified by Delirium Status

    Time frame: From end of 7-day intervention period until the development of delirium at any point during the post-transplant hospitalization up to a maximum of 30 days

    The relationship between thiamine levels at the end of the seven day administration of thiamine and the development of delirium at any point during the thirty days post-transplant or the post-transplant hospitalization, whichever comes first, will be examined. Thiamine levels (nmol/L) are presented in participants who did and did not experience delirium.

  4. Change in Health-related Quality of Life Scores (Month 1)

    Time frame: From baseline to one month post-transplant

    HRQOL will be assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Bone Marrow Transplant (FACT-BMT). The FACT-BMT is a 47-item self-administered assessment which asks individuals to rate questions related to physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being on a 5-point Likert Scale (0, not at all to 4, very much). Scores are summed across the items, resulting in a score from 0 to 148, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Negative change scores indicate worse HRQOL with time.

  5. Change in Health-related Quality of Life Scores (Month 3)

    Time frame: Baseline to three months post-transplant

    HRQOL will be assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Bone Marrow Transplant (FACT-BMT). The FACT-BMT is a 47-item self-administered assessment which asks individuals to rate questions related to physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being on a 5-point Likert Scale (0, not at all to 4, very much). Scores are summed across the items, resulting in a score from 0 to 148, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Negative change scores indicate worse HRQOL with time.

  6. Change in Health-related Quality of Life Scores (Month 6)

    Time frame: Baseline to six months post-transplant

    HRQOL will be assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Bone Marrow Transplant (FACT-BMT). The FACT-BMT is a 47-item self-administered assessment which asks individuals to rate questions related to physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being on a 5-point Likert Scale (0, not at all to 4, very much). Scores are summed across the items, resulting in a score from 0 to 148, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Negative change scores indicate worse HRQOL with time.

  7. Change in Depression Scores (Month 1)

    Time frame: Baseline to one month post-transplant

    Depression will be assessed using the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System - Depression (PROMIS-D) 8a short form. Scores for all PROMIS measures are reported on the T-score metric in which the mean=50 and standard deviation (SD) = 10 are centered on the general population means. Higher scores represent greater degrees of mood symptoms. Positive change scores indicate worse mood over time.

  8. Change in Depression Scores (Month 3)

    Time frame: Baseline to three months post-transplant

    Depression will be assessed using the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System - Depression (PROMIS-D) 8a short form. Scores for all PROMIS measures are reported on the T-score metric in which the mean=50 and standard deviation (SD) = 10 are centered on the general population means. Higher scores represent greater degrees of mood symptoms. Positive change scores indicate worse mood over time.

  9. Change in Depression Scores (Month 6)

    Time frame: Baseline to six months post-transplant

    Depression will be assessed using the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System - Depression (PROMIS-D) 8a short form. Scores for all PROMIS measures are reported on the T-score metric in which the mean=50 and standard deviation (SD) = 10 are centered on the general population means. Higher scores represent greater degrees of mood symptoms. Positive change scores indicate worse mood over time.

  10. Change in Post-traumatic Stress Symptom Scores (Month 1)

    Time frame: Baseline to one month post-transplant

    Post-traumatic stress symptoms will be measured using the Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome Scale 14 (PTSS-14). The PTSS-14 is a 14-item self-administered assessment. Questions are on a 7-point Likert-type Scale (1, never to 7, always) resulting in a total score between 14 and 98. Higher scores represent a more likely diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Positive change scores indicate worse post-traumatic stress over time.

  11. Change in Post-traumatic Stress Symptom Scores (Month 3)

    Time frame: Baseline to three months post-transplant

    Post-traumatic stress symptoms will be measured using the Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome Scale 14 (PTSS-14). The PTSS-14 is a 14-item self-administered assessment. Questions are on a 7-point Likert-type Scale (1, never to 7, always) resulting in a total score between 14 and 98. Higher scores represent a more likely diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Positive change scores indicate worse post-traumatic stress over time.

  12. Change in Post-traumatic Stress Symptom Scores (Month 6)

    Time frame: Baseline to six months post-transplant

    Post-traumatic stress symptoms will be measured using the Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome Scale 14 (PTSS-14). The PTSS-14 is a 14-item self-administered assessment. Questions are on a 7-point Likert-type Scale (1, never to 7, always) resulting in a total score between 14 and 98. Higher scores represent a more likely diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Positive change scores indicate worse post-traumatic stress over time.

  13. Change in Cognitive Function Scores (Month 1)

    Time frame: From baseline to one month post-transplant

    Cognitive function will be assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA). The MOCA is a clinician-administered tool with scores ranging from 0 to 30. Lower scores indicate worse cognitive function. Scores ≤ 25 are considered clinically significant. Positive change scores indicate better function with time.

  14. Change in Cognitive Function Scores (Month 3)

    Time frame: Baseline to three months post-transplant

    Cognitive function will be assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA). The MOCA is a clinician-administered tool with scores ranging from 0 to 30. Lower scores indicate worse cognitive function. Scores ≤ 25 are considered clinically significant. Positive change scores indicate better function with time.

  15. Change in Cognitive Function Scores (Month 6)

    Time frame: From baseline to six months post-transplant

    Cognitive function will be assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA). The MOCA is a clinician-administered tool with scores ranging from 0 to 30. Lower scores indicate worse cognitive function. Scores ≤ 25 are considered clinically significant. Positive change scores indicate better function with time.

  16. Change in Functional Status Scores (Month 1)

    Time frame: Baseline to one month post-transplant

    Functional status will be measured using the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance scale. ECOG performance status is a single question scored on a 6-point scale (range 0 to 5) with higher scores representing greater physical restriction due to illness. Negative change scores indicate better function with time.

  17. Change in Functional Status Scores (Month 3)

    Time frame: From baseline to three months post-transplant

    Functional status will be measured using the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance scale. ECOG performance status is a single question scored on a 6-point scale (range 0 to 5) with higher scores representing greater physical restriction due to illness. Negative change scores indicate better function with time.

  18. Change in Functional Status Scores (Month 6)

    Time frame: Baseline to six months post-transplant

    Functional status will be measured using the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance scale. ECOG performance status is a single question scored on a 6-point scale (range 0 to 5) with higher scores representing greater physical restriction due to illness. Negative change scores indicate better function with time.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center

Other

Collaborators

  • Rising Tide Foundation

Registry information

Official study title

Randomized Placebo Controlled Trial of High Dose Intravenous Thiamine for the Prevention of Delirium in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2020
Study completion
2020
First posted
Aug 28, 2017
Registry last updated
Oct 19, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.