Cardiology Research Institute Tomsk national Research Medical Center
Tomsk, Russia
NCT Number: NCT06261827
The primary aim of this single-center, prospective, randomized, controlled, study is to test the hypothesis that inhalation of NO 200 ppm prevents the development of nosocomial pneumonia in patients at risk after cardiac surgery under CPB. The study is interventional. Examination and treatment of patients is carried out in accordance with the approved standards of medical care for the relevant diseases. During the study, no experimental or unregistered (not approved for use) medical or diagnostic procedures in the territory of the Russian Federation will be carried out. The study includes patients admitted to the Cardiac Surgery Department of Cardiology Research Institute of Tomsk National Research Medical Center for elective surgery with CPB.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Tomsk, Russia
NOSOCOMIAL PNEUMONIA AFTER CARDIAC SURGERY WITH CADIOPULMONARY BYPASS. Nosocomial pneumonia (NP) is one of the most common complications of cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), its frequency according to various sources ranges from 2 to 10% . This complication is accompanied by higher mortality (0.7-4% in patients without pneumonia vs. 25.1-28.2% in patients with pneumonia) , prolonged hospital stay and increased economic costs. In the retrospective analysis of medical histories of patients operated on CPB for 2020, 2021 and 2022, 3 main risk factors for the development of NP in the postoperative period were identified: time of CPB ≥ 96 minutes, duration of mechanical ventilation ≥ 14 hours, and the presence of atrial fibrillation (AF) before surgery. STUDY NATURE In relation to medical procedures, this study is observational. The examination and treatment of patients will be carried out in accordance with the approved standards of medical care for the respective diseases. In this study, no experimental or unregistered (not approved for use) medical or diagnostic procedures on the territory of the Russian Federation will be carried out. STUDY TYPE Single-center, prospective, double-blind, randomized, controlled, parallel group study. STUDY OBJECTIVES PRIMARY OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY To test the hypothesis that inhalation of NO 200 ppm prevents the development of NP in patients after cardiac surgery under CPB and has a positive effect on the structural and functional state of the external respiration.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
RATIONALE FOR RANDOMIZATION There is currently no convincing evidence of benefits or harms of NO inhalation as part of the prevention of NP after cardiac surgery with CPB. Thus, there is no reason to believe that randomization to study groups creates additional risks / benefits for patients. Nevertheless, regardless of the results of randomization, the decision on the possibility of prophylactic NO inhalation after cardiac surgery in each case will be made by a special medical commission consisting of a cardiac surgeon, anesthesiologist and cardiologist, immediately after the patient is enrolled in the study.
PATIENT RANDOMIZATION Patients eligible for this study will be randomized to the intervention group (NO group) and Control group in a 1: 1 ratio according to the randomization sequence generated by a computer program with random numbers by 80 people in each group. Patients will be randomized immediately after screening and signing the informed consent. Patients in both groups will not receive NO outside of the study protocol until discharged from the hospital. Patient randomization will be performed by a non-blinded NO delivery investigator who is not involved in the clinical management of the patient and the evaluation of treatment outcomes. Patients in the intervention group will receive inhaled NO therapy at a dose of 200 ppm 2 times a day for 5 days or until pneumonia is detected. In the control group, instead of inhaled NO therapy, patients will receive "Sham treatment": similar equipment and observation protocol during the intervention will be used as in the main group, but NO will not be added to the delivered gas mixture. BLINDING The gas supply systems will look the same for patients of both NO group and Control group. Patients, treating physicians, investigators and other professionals involved in the interpretation of the results will not be aware of the nature of the therapy until the end of the study. The investigating doctor who is responsible for the delivery and monitoring of the investigated gas will remain unblinded and will be responsible for blinding the gas delivery systems, monitoring and securing the delivery, and maintaining the randomization codes. Randomization codes will be sealed in sequentially numbered opaque envelopes. The sequential envelope numbers will serve as randomization numbers that will be recorded in patient's case report form (CRF) and used when necessary, for example, to treat complications. DOSAGE REGIMEN AND DURATION OF THERAPY When choosing the dose and timing of NO exposure, clinicians should be guided by 2 basic principles:
Individual patient's participation in the study will be terminated prematurely in accordance with the following criteria:
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Oxygen-air mixture without NO after extubation after surgery for 5 days 2 times a day for 30 min
Other names: Oxygen-Air Mixture
NO will be supplemented at 200-ppm concentration after surgery for 5 days 2 times a day for 30 min
Other names: Nitric Oxide
Time frame: From the date of randomization until the date of discharge from hospital (from 2 to 4 weeks)
The difference in the incidence of nosocomial pneumonia development (percent).
Time frame: 7 days from the date of randomization
The difference in the levels of leukocytes (counts)
Time frame: 7 days from the date of randomization
The difference between the levels of immature cells (counts) in the leukocyte formula
Time frame: 7 days from the date of randomization
The difference in the levels of C-reactive protein
Time frame: 7 days from the date of randomization
The difference in the levels of procalcitonin
Time frame: 7 days from the date of randomization
The difference in the levels of presepsin
Time frame: 7 days from the date of randomization
The difference in the levels of ferritin
Time frame: 7 days from the date of randomization
The difference in the levels of LDH
Time frame: 7 days from the date of randomization
The difference in the levels of IL-6
Time frame: 7 days from the date of randomization
The difference in the levels of IL-8
Time frame: 7 days from the date of randomization
The difference in the levels of SP-D
Time frame: 7 days from the date of randomization
The difference in the levels of sRAGE
Time frame: 7 days from the date of randomization
The difference in the levels of endothelin-1
Time frame: 7 days from the date of randomization
The difference in the levels of ADMA
Time frame: 7 days from the date of randomization
The difference in the levels of VEGF-A
Time frame: 7 days from the date of randomization
The difference in the levels of angiopoietin-1
Time frame: 7 days from the date of randomization
The difference in the levels of angiopoietin-2
Time frame: 7 days from the date of randomization
The difference in S/F index
Time frame: 7 days from the date of randomization
Adverse lung ultrasound findings are: increase in the volume of pleural effusion, appearance of consolidation, increase in the severity of interstitial involvement (increase in the number of B-lines)
Time frame: 10 days from the date of randomization
Six-minute walk test (6MWT) distance (meters) is assessed.
Time frame: 7 days from the date of randomization
Lung vital capacity is assessed in liters (L)
Time frame: 7 days from the date of randomization
Forced vital capacity is assessed in liters (L)
Time frame: 7 days from the date of randomization
Forced expiratory volume is assessed in liters per second (L/s)
Time frame: 7 days from the date of randomization
Peak expiratory flow is assessed in liters per second (L/s)
Time frame: 10 days from the date of randomization
VE-minute ventilation is assessed in liters per minute
Time frame: 10 days from the date of randomization
VT-tidal volume is assessed in liters
Time frame: 10 days from the date of randomization
VE/VO2 is assessed as ratio of VE to VO2
Time frame: 10 days from the date of randomization
VE/VСO2 is assessed as ratio of VE to VCO2
Time frame: 10 days from the date of randomization
PetO2 is assessed in mm Hg
Time frame: 10 days from the date of randomization
PetCO2 is assessed in mm Hg
Time frame: Every day from the date of randomization until day 7
The difference in the levels of exhaled NO before the start of the inhaled NO inhalations, upon its completion, 10 and 20 minutes after its completion.
Time frame: Every day from the date of randomization until day 7
The difference in the levels of SBP
Time frame: Every day from the date of randomization until day 7
The difference in the levels of DBP
Time frame: Every day from the date of randomization until day 7
The difference in HR is assessed in beats per minute
Time frame: Every day from the date of randomization until day 7
The difference in RR is assessed in breaths per minute
Time frame: Every day from the date of randomization until day 7
The difference in SpO2 levels
Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Other
High-dose Inhaled NO Therapy for the pREvention of nosoCOmial Pneumonia After Cardiac Surgery Under caRDiopulmonary Bypass
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06162455
Cross Infection, Disease Attributes
Tomsk, Select..., Russia
View Trial DetailsNCT04223752
Cross Infection, Disease Attributes
Orlando, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01431326
Adenoviridae Infections, Adenovirus
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05928208
Cross Infection, Disease Attributes
Cluj-Napoca, Cluj, Romania
View Trial Details