Department of Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Jinan, Shandong, Wenhuaxilu, China
NCT Number: NCT07121205
Background:
High-dose dual therapy (HDDT) has emerged as a potential first-line treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection, but its efficacy and safety across different regimens and populations remain unclear. This study aimed to compare real-world outcomes of various HDDT protocols and identify factors influencing treatment failure.
Methods:
A multicenter retrospective analysis was conducted using data from 15 medical centers (January 2022-January 2025). Patients received one of four HDDT regimens: vonoprazan-amoxicillin for 10 days (VA-10) or 14 days (VA-14), esomeprazole-amoxicillin (EA), or tegoprazan-amoxicillin (TA). Primary outcomes included eradication rates (modified intention-to-treat analysis) and adverse events.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–70 year
All sexes
Observational
Jinan, Shandong, Wenhuaxilu, China
This study is a multicenter, retrospective, observational study utilizing medical records of outpatients who received standard high-dose dual therapy (HDDT) for Helicobacter pylori eradication between January 2022 and January 2025. The aim was to compare the efficacy and adverse event rates of different HDDT regimens.
Collected data included:
Baseline demographics (age, sex, etc.)
Medical/lifestyle history
Treatment regimens
Adverse events
Compliance
All data were anonymized at collection, and no additional patient contact or information collection was required. Since this study involved only retrospective chart review without new interventions, patient consent was waived by the ethics committee.
Treatment Groups
Patients were categorized based on their actual prescribed regimens:
Amoxicillin + Vonoprazan (10-day course)
Amoxicillin + Vonoprazan (14-day course)
Amoxicillin + Tegoprazan (14-day course)
Amoxicillin + Esomeprazole (14-day course)
These groups were compared to assess differences in H. pylori eradication rates.
Study Characteristics No active intervention or real-time questionnaire collection was involved.
Complies with the real-world evidence (RWE) framework for retrospective studies.
Primary Outcome Eradication rate comparison between HDDT regimens (assessed via modified intention-to-treat analysis).
Secondary Outcomes Adverse event rates across different HDDT regimens.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
This study is a retrospective study, and all data have been collected in advance with no active intervention required.
Time frame: 4-6 weeks
Comparison of Eradication Rates among Four Different High-Dose Dual Therapies for Helicobacter pylori
Time frame: 4-6 weeks
Time frame: 4-6 weeks
Liyueyue
Other
Comparative Analysis of High-Dose Dual Therapies in First-Line Helicobacter Pylori Eradication: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
Acronym: RETROHP
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07651202
Glucose Metabolism Disorders, HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTIONS
Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
View Trial DetailsNCT07455448
HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTIONS
Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
View Trial DetailsNCT07374822
HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTIONS
Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
View Trial DetailsNCT07333001
HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTIONS
Jinan, Shandong, China
View Trial Details