UZ Brussel
Brussels, Belgium
NCT Number: NCT02787265
This is a prospective, multi-center, observational follow-up study observing the effectiveness of high density spinal cord stimulation in patients with failed back surgery syndrome patients with back and leg pain.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–65 year
All sexes
Observational
Brussels, Belgium
DISCOVER will measure the effectiveness of high-density spinal cord stimulation for treatment of chronic back and leg pain. Identification of clinical effective parameters concerning location of active electrodes, frequency, pulse duration, amplitude and battery consumption are, besides safety, the major outcome parameters of this study.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Other names: high density spinal cord stimulation
Time frame: The difference between the baseline screening and the evaluation 1 month after high density stimulation, 3 months and 12 months.
Time frame: The difference between the baseline screening and the evaluation 1 month after high density stimulation, 3 months and 12 months.
Questionnaire regarding the amount of pain relief by pain medication
Time frame: The difference between the baseline screening and the evaluation 1 month after high density stimulation, 3 months and 12 months.
The functional abilities will be assessed with the Oswestry Low Back Pain Questionnaire.
Time frame: The difference between the baseline screening and the evaluation 1 month after high density stimulation, 3 months and 12 months.
The health status will be observed with the Euroqol (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire.
Time frame: The difference between the baseline screening and the evaluation 1 month after high density stimulation, 3 months and 12 months.
Subjective sleep quality will be assessed with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI).
Time frame: The difference between the baseline screening and the evaluation 1 month after high density stimulation, 3 months and 12 months.
Patient's satisfaction with the stimulation will be assessed with a 5 item Likert scale
Time frame: The difference between the evaluation 1 month after high density stimulation, 3 months and 12 months.
The patient has to draw the areas of pain coverage on a body shape figure
Time frame: The difference between the evaluation 1 month after high density stimulation, 3 months and 12 months.
Patient indicates the threshold at which he experiences paresthesia
Time frame: The difference between the evaluation 1 month after high density stimulation, 3 months and 12 months.
Questionnaire towards the clinician regarding the ideal high density parameters for this patient
Time frame: The difference between the evaluation 1 month after high density stimulation, 3 months and 12 months.
The battery usage will be measured by frequencies to recharge the battery.
Time frame: The difference between the evaluation 1 month after high density stimulation, 3 months and 12 months.
Acquire information on activity from the internal diary; amount of times that patients need to fit the ideal parameters themselves
Time frame: The difference between the baseline screening and the evaluation 1 month after high density stimulation, 3 months and 12 months.
Questionnaire regarding the need for MR scans for other medical conditions
Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel
Other
Acronym: Discover
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06272539
Back Pain, Behavior
Torrent, Valencia, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT06647576
Back Pain, Chronic Neuropathic Pain
Grand Island, Nebraska, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04732325
Autonomic Nervous System Diseases, Back Pain
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06229015
Autonomic Nervous System Diseases, Back Pain
Pavia, Italy
View Trial Details