Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02787265

High-density in Spinal Cord Stimulation: Virtual Expert Registry

This is a prospective, multi-center, observational follow-up study observing the effectiveness of high density spinal cord stimulation in patients with failed back surgery syndrome patients with back and leg pain.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

UZ Brussel

Brussels, Belgium

About this study

DISCOVER will measure the effectiveness of high-density spinal cord stimulation for treatment of chronic back and leg pain. Identification of clinical effective parameters concerning location of active electrodes, frequency, pulse duration, amplitude and battery consumption are, besides safety, the major outcome parameters of this study.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Failed Back Surgery Syndrome patients (FBSS) with insufficient pain reduction with conventional SCS or FBSS patients suitable for SCS
  • Age > 18 years
  • Chronic pain as a result of FBSS that exists for at least 6 months with a pain intensity 5 or higher measured on numeric rating scale (NRS)
  • Patient has been informed of the study procedures and has given written informed consent
  • Patient willing to comply with study protocol including attending the study visits

Exclusion criteria

  • Expected inability of patients to receive or properly operate the spinal cord stimulation system
  • History of coagulation disorders, lupus erythematosus, diabetic neuropathy, rheumatoid arthritis or morbus Bechterew
  • Active malignancy
  • Addiction to any of the following drugs, alcohol (5E/day) and/or medication
  • Evidence of an active disruptive psychiatric disorder or other known condition significant enough to impact perception of pain, compliance to intervention and/or ability to evaluate treatment outcome as determined by investigator
  • Immune deficiency (HIV positive, immunosuppressiva, etc.)
  • Life expectancy < 1 year
  • Local infection or other skin disorder at site of incision
  • Pregnancy
  • Other implanted active medical device

Treatment and study plan

Spinal Cord Stimulation

Device

Other names: high density spinal cord stimulation

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain intensity with the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)

    Time frame: The difference between the baseline screening and the evaluation 1 month after high density stimulation, 3 months and 12 months.

  2. Pain relief by pain medication

    Time frame: The difference between the baseline screening and the evaluation 1 month after high density stimulation, 3 months and 12 months.

    Questionnaire regarding the amount of pain relief by pain medication

  3. The abilities in daily living

    Time frame: The difference between the baseline screening and the evaluation 1 month after high density stimulation, 3 months and 12 months.

    The functional abilities will be assessed with the Oswestry Low Back Pain Questionnaire.

  4. The current health status

    Time frame: The difference between the baseline screening and the evaluation 1 month after high density stimulation, 3 months and 12 months.

    The health status will be observed with the Euroqol (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire.

  5. Subjective sleep quality

    Time frame: The difference between the baseline screening and the evaluation 1 month after high density stimulation, 3 months and 12 months.

    Subjective sleep quality will be assessed with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI).

  6. Patient's satisfaction

    Time frame: The difference between the baseline screening and the evaluation 1 month after high density stimulation, 3 months and 12 months.

    Patient's satisfaction with the stimulation will be assessed with a 5 item Likert scale

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain area coverage

    Time frame: The difference between the evaluation 1 month after high density stimulation, 3 months and 12 months.

    The patient has to draw the areas of pain coverage on a body shape figure

  2. Paresthesia threshold

    Time frame: The difference between the evaluation 1 month after high density stimulation, 3 months and 12 months.

    Patient indicates the threshold at which he experiences paresthesia

  3. HD stim parameters

    Time frame: The difference between the evaluation 1 month after high density stimulation, 3 months and 12 months.

    Questionnaire towards the clinician regarding the ideal high density parameters for this patient

  4. Battery efficiency of the neurostimulator

    Time frame: The difference between the evaluation 1 month after high density stimulation, 3 months and 12 months.

    The battery usage will be measured by frequencies to recharge the battery.

  5. AdaptiveStim use (in case of Restore Sensor)

    Time frame: The difference between the evaluation 1 month after high density stimulation, 3 months and 12 months.

    Acquire information on activity from the internal diary; amount of times that patients need to fit the ideal parameters themselves

  6. MRI need

    Time frame: The difference between the baseline screening and the evaluation 1 month after high density stimulation, 3 months and 12 months.

    Questionnaire regarding the need for MR scans for other medical conditions

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel

Other

Collaborators

  • Medtronic

Registry information

Acronym: Discover

Important dates

Study start
2016
Primary completion
2020
Study completion
2020
First posted
Jun 1, 2016
Registry last updated
Feb 1, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.