Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04655638

HFNT vs. COT in COVID-19

The aim of this unblinded parallel-group randomized multicenter clinical trial is to compare the clinical effectiveness of high flow nasal therapy (HFNT) with conventional oxygen therapy (COT) in patients with confirmed COVID-19 related acute hypoxemic respiratory failure.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Department of Anesthesiology, University of Thessaly, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Larissa, Greece

Loading trial locations.

About this study

The interventions will be delivered in any hospital ward caring for COVID-19 patients.

The interventions under investigation will be high flow nasal therapy in comparison with conventional oxygen therapy.

HFNT will be delivered by any device (standalone machine or ventilators able to deliver it). The initial flow rate will be set at 40 L/min and potentially increased up to 60 L/min, according to patient tolerance. Large-bore nasal prongs will be selected according to the size of patients' nostrils (i.e. 2/3 of the diameter of the patient's nostril). A surgical mask will be placed on top of the HFNT interface. The temperature will be set at 37°C or 34 °C according to the patient's comfort. The FiO2 will be adjusted to maintain SpO2 between 92-96%. A feeding tube or a nasogastric tube will not represent a contraindication for the use of HFNT provided the patency of the used nostril.

Conventional Oxygen therapy will be delivered by any device or combination of devices used for delivering oxygen such as nasal cannula, Venturi Mask or Mask with or without a reservoir bag as per usual local practice. Oxygen flow will be titrated to achieve SpO2 between 92-96%.

Co-interventions: Patients potentially eligible for the study will be evaluated by the attending physicians and receive medical therapy based on the attending physician's decision and local protocols. Awake proning is allowed. Local protocols, including drugs and awake proning, will be discussed with the enrolling centers at the initiation visit, and adherence to WHO guidelines will be recommended. Written informed consent from all the patients will be collected.

Termination criteria & protocol violation: Criteria for weaning off COT or HFNT was at clinical discretion of the managing physician based on the improvement in oxygenation with ability to maintain SpO2 of 96% or greater with less than 0.30 of FiO2 or P/F > 300. The switch from COT to HFNT should be considered a protocol violation and should be based on clinical decision of the treating physician.

Criteria to be considered for escalation of treatment: 1) SpO2 ≤ 92% despite COT or HFNT or P/F ≤ 180 with FiO2 ≥ 50%, and 2) at least one of the following: respiratory rate ≥ 28 breaths/min, severe dyspnea, signs of increased work of breathing (e.g. use of accessory muscles). If the patient meets these criteria, escalation of treatment CPAP, NIV or IMV will be considered.

The choice of the type of escalating treatment will be a clinical decision of the treating physician.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years old
  • Tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) nasopharyngeal swabs
  • Clinical signs of acute respiratory infection and radiological evidence of pneumonia
  • Hospital admission in any ward or Emergency Department within 48 h
  • SpO2 ≤ 92% or PaO2/FiO2 < 300 in room air and need for oxygen therapy according to clinical judgment, at the screening.

Exclusion criteria

  • PaO2/FiO2 ≤ 200
  • Respiratory rate ≥ 28 breaths/min and or severe dyspnea and or use of accessory muscles
  • Need for immediate intubation or noninvasive ventilation (including CPAP) according to clinical judgment (e.g. clinical diagnosis of cardiogenic pulmonary edema, respiratory acidosis pH ≤ 7.3)
  • Patients already on CPAP/NIV or HFNT at study screening
  • Septic shock
  • Evidence of multiorgan failure
  • Glasgow Coma Scale < 13
  • Inability to comprehend the study content and give informed consent
  • PaCO2 > 45 mmHg, (if blood gas available) or history of chronic hypercapnia
  • Patient already on long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT) or home NIV/CPAP (even if only overnight)
  • Neuromuscular disease
  • Limitation of care based on patients' or physicians' decision

Treatment and study plan

High Flow Nasal Therapy

Device

High flow nasal therapy will be delivered by any device (standalone machine or ventilators able to deliver it). The initial flow rate will be set at 40 L/min and potentially increased up to 60 L/min, according to patient tolerance. Large-bore nasal prongs will be selected according to the size of patients' nostrils (i.e. 2/3 of the diameter of the patient's nostril). A surgical mask will be placed on top of the HFNT interface. The temperature will be set at 37°C or 34 °C according to the patient's comfort. The FiO2 will be adjusted to maintain SpO2 between 92-96%.

Conventional Oxygen Therapy

Device

Conventional Oxygen therapy will be delivered by any device or combination of devices used for delivering oxygen such as nasal cannula, Venturi Mask or Mask with or without a reservoir bag as per usual local practice. Oxygen flow will be titrated to achieve SpO2 between 92-96%.

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of patients needing escalation of treatment during hospital stay

    Time frame: 28 days

    Proportion of patients needing escalation of treatment (i.e. noninvasive ventilation - including CPAP - or intubation).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion of patients needing intubation during hospital stay

    Time frame: 28 days

  2. Proportion of patients who receive CPAP during hospital stay

    Time frame: 28 days

    Proportion of patients who receive continuous positive airway pressure during hospital stay

  3. Proportion of patients who receive NIV during hospital stay

    Time frame: 28 days

    Proportion of patients undergone noninvasive ventilation (e.g. BiLevel, PSV)

  4. Proportion of patients admitted to intensive care unit during hospital stay

    Time frame: 28 days

  5. Proportion of patients who terminate the study protocols for improvement

    Time frame: 28 days

  6. Length of stay in hospital

    Time frame: 28 days

  7. Time to escalation of treatment to CPAP/NIV during hospital stay

    Time frame: 28 days

  8. Time to escalation of treatment to intubation/invasive ventilation during hospital stay

    Time frame: 28 days

  9. Length of stay in ICU

    Time frame: 28 day

  10. Days free from CPAP/NIV during hospital stay

    Time frame: 28 days

  11. Ventilator-free days during hospital stay

    Time frame: 28 days

  12. Oxygen-free days during hospital stay

    Time frame: 28 days

  13. 28-day mortality

    Time frame: 28 days from hospital admission

  14. 60-day mortality

    Time frame: 60 days from hospital admission

  15. Hospital mortality

    Time frame: 28 days

  16. Treatment interruption due to intolerance during study treatment

    Time frame: 28 days

  17. Dyspnea score (BORG scale) during hospital stay

    Time frame: 28 days

    [0= no dyspnea to 10= severe dyspnea] - daily collection

  18. National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) during hospital stay

    Time frame: 28 days

    Daily collection of Six simple physiological parameters that form the basis of the scoring system: respiration rate, oxygen saturation, systolic blood pressure, pulse rate, level of consciousness or new confusion, temperature. A score is allocated to each parameter, with the magnitude of the score reflecting how extremely the parameter varies from the norm. The score is then aggregated and uplifted by 2 points for people requiring supplemental oxygen to maintain their recommended oxygen saturation. Range of values: 0 (best) - 23 (worst) points.

  19. ROX index during hospital stay

    Time frame: 28 days

    SpO2/FiO2/Respiratory rate - daily collection

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico Paolo Giaccone Palermo

Other

Collaborators

  • Azienda Ospedaliera, Universitaria Policlinico Vittorio Emanuele

Registry information

Official study title

High-Flow Nasal Therapy Versus Conventional Oxygen Therapy in Patients With COVID-19: A Randomized Controlled Trial (The COVID-HIGH Trial)

Acronym: COVID-HIGH

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2021
First posted
Dec 7, 2020
Registry last updated
Oct 26, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.