Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital, Department of Medicine, Chiang Mai University
Muang, Chiang Mai, 50130, Thailand
NCT Number: NCT02713620
This is a follow up study from the published article entitled "Comparison of immunogenicity and safety of four doses and four double doses vs. standard doses of hepatitis B vaccination in HIV-infected adults: a randomized, controlled trial" by Chaiklang K, Wipasa J, Chaiwarith R, Praparattanapan J, Supparatpinyo K. that was published in PLoS One. 2013 Nov 12;8(11):e80409. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080409. eCollection 2013. ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT1289106. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the HBV vaccination regimens using either four standard doses or four double doses compared with the current standard regimen of three doses in HIV-infected adults in northern Thailand. In addition, the investigators evaluated the efficacy of the HBV vaccination with the current standard regimen of three doses between healthy adults and HIV-infected patients.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
Muang, Chiang Mai, 50130, Thailand
From February 4, 2011 to May 4, 2012, 132 HIV-infected adults with CD4+ cell counts >200 cells/mm3, undetectable plasma HIV-1 RNA, and negative for all HBV markers were randomly assigned to receive one of three recombinant vaccine (Hepavax-Gene® Berna, Korea) regimens: 20 μg IM at months 0, 1, and 6 (Standard doses group, n=44), 20 μg IM at months 0, 1, 2, 6 (four doses group, n=44), or 40 μg IM at months 0, 1, 2, and 6 (four double doses group, n=44). There was another group of healthy individuals received standard dose of 20 μg IM at months 0, 1, and 6 recruited during the same time and under the same protocol. In brief, at months 7 and 12, the percentages of responders (anti-HBs ≥10 mIU/mL) were 88.6% and 70.4% in the Standard doses group, 93.2% and 86.4% in the four doses group, (P=0.713 and 0.119), and 95.4% and 88.6% in the four double doses group, (P=0.434 and 0.062), respectively.
This current study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the different HBV vaccination regimens at 36 months after vaccination. In addition to compare the group using four standard doses or four double doses with the current standard regimen of three doses in HIV-infected adults in northern Thailand, the investigators also compare the efficacy of the current standard regimen of 3 doses between HIV-infected and healthy individuals.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
1.4 and were willing to sign an informed consent
Exclusion criteria
For HIV group 1, 2, and 3
Different HBV vaccine regimen in each group
Time frame: 36 months after vaccination
Comparison of proportion of participants who had protective immunity (anti-HBS titer >=10 mIU/ml) against HBV between "healthy" v.s. "HIV group 1", "HIV group 2" v.s. "HIV group 1", "HIV group 3 v.s. "HIV group 1"
Time frame: 36 months after vaccination
Comparison of the geometric means of anti-HBS titers between "healthy" v.s. "HIV group 1", "HIV group 2" v.s. "HIV group 1", "HIV group 3 v.s. "HIV group 1"
Time frame: 36 months after vaccination
Comparison of proportion of participants who had anti-HBS titers >=100 mIU/ml between "healthy" v.s. "HIV group 1", "HIV group 2" v.s. "HIV group 1", "HIV group 3 v.s. "HIV group 1"
Chiang Mai University
Other
Comparison of Immunogenicity of Four Doses and Four Double Doses vs. Standard Doses of Hepatitis B Vaccination in HIV-infected Adults: a Result From Randomized Controlled Trial at 3 Years After Vaccination
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT00004850
Blood-Borne Infections, Communicable Diseases
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06422767
Blood-Borne Infections, Communicable Diseases
Austin, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07637214
Blood-Borne Infections, Bronchial Diseases
Wuhan, Hubei, China
View Trial DetailsNCT05551273
Blood-Borne Infections, Communicable Diseases
San Diego, California, United States
View Trial Details