Department of Hepatobilliary Surgery, Cancer Center, Sun Yat-sen University
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, China
NCT Number: NCT00652587
The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether hepatectomy combining with adjuvant transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) for Stage IIIA hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) resulting better long-term survival outcome when compared with hepatectomy alone.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–70 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, China
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common malignancies in the world, and the prevalence is increasing in the United States. Hepatectomy is still considered as the potentially curative treatment for HCC. Unfortunately, long-term survival after hepatectomy is still unsatisfactory because of the high incidence of tumor recurrence, especially intrahepatic recurrence.
Stage IIIA hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) include multiple tumors more than 5 cm or tumor involving a major branch of the portal or hepatic vein(s) in the International Union Against Cancer (UICC) TNM staging for liver tumors, sixth edition 2002. Until now there are controversies in the management of Stage IIIA HCC. According to the Barcelona -Clinic-Liver-Cancer (BCLC) proposal, Stage IIIA HCC represented as intermediate or advanced disease. The European Association for Study of the Liver (EASL) and the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) recommended randomized controlled trials of chemoembolization or new agents for such stage of disease. Whereas in Asian areas, such as China or Japan, partial hepatectomy or reductive surgery (with or without adjuvant therapy) was performed for multiple advanced HCC or tumor with a major branch of the portal or hepatic vein(s) invasion, although no prospective study to assess the therapeutic efficacy and safety. On the other hand, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the most widely used primary treatment for unresectable HCC. It was also used as the optional treatment of relapsed disease. However, the efficacy of TACE used as adjuvant therapy following hepatectomy remains controversial. Neither are there large randomized controlled trials to address this field. Therefore, a randomized controlled trial was performed in our cancer center to compare hepatectomy with adjuvant TACE and hepatectomy alone for the Stage IIIA HCC.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
partial hepatectomy with adjuvant transcatheter arterial chemoembolization
hepatectomy alone
Other names: hepatectomy alone
Time frame: 1-, 3-, and 5-year
Sun Yat-sen University
Other
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Hepatectomy With Adjuvant Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Versus Hepatectomy Alone for Stage IIIA Hepatocellular Carcinoma
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT01409499
Adenocarcinoma, Carcinoma
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
View Trial DetailsNCT06950827
Adenocarcinoma, Carcinoma
Chengdu, Sichuan, China
View Trial DetailsNCT05602974
Adenocarcinoma, Adjuvant Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
View Trial DetailsNCT04892810
Adenocarcinoma, Carcinoma
Grenoble, France
View Trial Details