Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Baltimore, Maryland, 21287, United States
NCT Number: NCT04058665
Perioperative variables that can be used to create a bundled approach quality improvement protocol to minimize blood loss in spine surgery will be evaluated using retrospective data collection and multivariate analysis of previously performed spinal surgeries at Johns Hopkins Hospital. In particular the investigators are interested in determining whether FloSeal® contributes towards increased control over perioperative bleeding compared to other hemostatic agents for potential inclusion in a future bundled approach.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Baltimore, Maryland, 21287, United States
Blood loss is a major concern in spine surgery. Within lumbar fusion surgery, one study estimated an average blood loss of 800 mL (range 100-3,100 mL) for non-instrumented fusion and 1,517 mL (range 360-7,000 mL) for instrumented fusions. Blood transfusions are required in an estimated 8% to 36% of patients undergoing spine surgery.Transfusion promotes tissue perfusion and oxygen delivery during extensive surgeries, yet carries with it rare but significant risks. These include acute lung injury, febrile reactions, allergic episodes, infection, and impaired immune response. Given these potential risks, strategies to minimize extensive blood loss and resultant transfusion are warranted.
Previously described approaches in the literature that can minimize blood loss during spine surgery include: hypotensive anesthesia, hemostatic agents (e.g. FloSeal®), antifibrinolytic medications, advanced bipolar cautery (e.g. Aquamantys®), autologous blood salvage (e.g. Cell Saver®), perioperative and intraoperative temperature, operative time, nutritional state, coagulopathy, restrictive transfusion triggers, and rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM).
Researchers in several medical fields have attempted to delineate comprehensive anemia prevention strategies described as "blood-saving bundles". A bundle encapsulates multiple evidence-based interventions that result in improved patient outcomes-here with a focus on reduced blood loss-when combined versus when each intervention is used in isolation. Care bundles applied to intensive care unit treatment and pneumonia, sepsis, and acute kidney injury care have demonstrated improved clinical outcomes. However, no bundled protocol currently exists that aim to decrease blood loss and transfusion incidence during spine surgery. Moreover, no data exist that identify whether use of FloSeal® over other hemostatic agents as part of a bundled protocol results in decreased blood loss and transfusion rates, improved surgical outcomes, and improved cost effectiveness.
Perioperative variables that can be used to create a bundled approach quality improvement protocol to minimize blood loss in spine surgery will be evaluated using retrospective data collection and multivariate analysis of previously performed spinal surgeries at Johns Hopkins Hospital. In particular the investigators are interested in determining whether FloSeal® contributes towards increased control over perioperative bleeding compared to other hemostatic agents for potential inclusion in a future bundled approach.
This retrospective multivariate analysis will identify potential factors associated with increased blood loss and transfusion incidence. The investigators anticipate using these findings to develop a future bundled protocol for implementation in all patients undergoing spine surgery at Johns Hopkins Hospital after approval by the Institutional Review Board. Such a bundled protocol has the potential to improve surgical outcomes and decrease institutional costs.
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Hemostatic agent
Time frame: 1 week
Cubic centimeters (cm^3) of blood loss throughout the operation.
Time frame: Up to 1 month
Days spent over entire hospital stay.
Time frame: Up to 3 months
All types of infection will be collected (surgical site infection, pneumonia, etc.)
Time frame: Up to 1 month
All possible transfusion complications
Time frame: Up to 1 month
Overall number of patient infections and transfusion complications.
Time frame: Up to 1 year
Total cost (dollars).
Time frame: Up to 1 year
Cost (dollars) of the actual operation.
Time frame: Up to 1 year
Cost (dollars) included in the overall hospital stay.
Time frame: Up to 1 year
Cost (dollars) for the amount of transfusions the patient required.
Time frame: Up to 1 month
Postoperatively placed in the intensive care unit versus regular hospital floor.
Time frame: Up to 1 month
Discharged home versus discharged to a rehab facility.
Johns Hopkins University
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05980013
Blood Loss, Fluid Loss
Denver, Colorado, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06855472
Blood Loss, Hemorrhage
Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT04089865
Blood Loss, Blood Transfusion
New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03249038
Blood Loss, Blood Loss, Postoperative
View Trial Details