Hemopatch Safety and Efficacy Evaluation Versus Standard Practice for Sealing the Dura in Cerebrospinal Fluid Leaks

Various techniques have been developed to overcome this problem and achieve a tight dural closure. Although there is published evidence showing the efficacy and safety of some of these sealants in posterior fossa surgery, the different types of pathologies and various population risk factors included in these trials make it difficult to interpret the results. Having selective inclusion criteria and including patients with a selected pathology could be essential to obtain clearer results.

Postoperative CSF leak has two aspects: one is pseudomeningocele (a subcutaneous collection of CSF); the other is a CSF fistula in which CSF reaches the skin. This second one is much more dangerous and constitutes one of the most important complications of this surgery, but the pseudomeningocele is a clinical demonstration of failure of the dural closure.

HEMOPATCH is a soft, thin, foldable and flexible collagen patch, coated with NHS-PEG. HEMOPATCH is indicated as a hemostatic device and surgical seal for procedures in which control of bleeding or leakage of other body fluids or air by conventional surgical techniques is ineffective or impractical.

Preliminary clinical evidence collects a prospective case series of 200 patients, in which the authors reviewed the use of HEMOPATCH for dural augmentation in high-risk patients from 2014 to this year. After 2 years of refining the technique, a decrease in CSF leaks from 27% to 7% was achieved, and no adverse events related to the application of the product were observed. A retrospective cohort study has recently been published comparing the use of HEMOPATCH versus routine clinical practice in 290 patients, in which 147 used standard dural reinforcement techniques, and 143 used HEMOPATCH. The CSF fistula appearance rates were 7.69% in the HEMOPATCH group, compared to 32.65% in the control group.

These recent results, along with the characteristics and properties of the patch, could make this sealant a safe and plausible option to achieve sealing after posterior fossa surgery.

Inclusion criteria

• Patients who are planned for non-traumatic posterior fossa surgery
• Surgery that requires opening and closing of the dura mater.
• Patients who have a clean surgical wound (class I surgical wound classification)
• Patients undergoing one of the following surgical procedures:
• Space occupant injuries (LOEs) rese dried through the following approaches:
• Approaching the rear pit of the middle line
• Approach to the posterior paramedian fossa
• Approach to the cerebellar pontine angle (PC) and the back of the petrous vertex
• Clinical diagnosis of primary Chiari 1 (CM1) malformation and scheduled decompression surgery, with evidence of NM of tonsil herniation down by an independent official radiology report.
• Subjects who are able to provide written informed consent prior to participating in the clinical trial.
• Be over 18 years of age.
• Understand the purpose of the study and be available for frequent hospital visits.
• Women of childbearing potential and males with partners of childbearing potential should commit to using a highly effective method of contraception (such as surgical sterilization, double barrier method, oral contraceptives or contraceptive hormonal implants) and to continue to use them for up to 6 months after surgery.

Exclusion criteria

• Patients undergoing a supratentorial surgical procedure/approach.
• Patients undergoing any other approach/surgical procedure at the base of the skull that is not in the posterior pit:
• Side boarding of the foramen magno: far side, extreme side, anterolateral, posterolateral,
• Approaching the jugular foramen: infratemporal, condylar juxta, transjugular
• Approach to the middle pit: subtemporal (+/-petrous apex perforation), pterional approach (any temporary fronto approach +/- orbitozygomatic replacement)
• Approach to the previous pit: subfrontal (uni or bilateral)
• Presence of hydrocephalus not resolved prior to surgery
• Previous surgery in the posterior pit.
• Pre-radiation therapy treatment.
• Previous (within the last 6 months) or anticipated neurosurgical procedure involving the opening of the dura mater that may affect the safety assessment
• > 1 dural opening
• Inability to understand informed consent or unwillingness to participate in the study.
• Inability, at the time of consent, to return for follow-up evaluations after surgery
• Evidence of spinal dysraphism.
• Allergy, hypersensitivity or history of allergic reaction to Hemopatch or its components (to bovine proteins or bright blue dye: FD&C blue No. 1 [blue 1]).
• Evidence of an infection within 5 days prior to the start of the study.
• Pregnancy or planning to become pregnant during the course of the study. Breast feeding