Hôpital Robert Debré, Université de Reims
Reims, 51092, France
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT06062303
Over-resuscitation including fluid overload has been associated with increased morbidity (prolonged duration of organ failure) and mortality in septic shock. "One-size-fits-all" resuscitation strategies may increase septic shock mortality. However, clinical studies on individualized resuscitation are lacking. Hemodynamic phenotyping may allow to individualize septic shock resuscitation. The ANDROMEDA-SHOCK trial found that a simple clinical and bedside CRT-targeted resuscitation reduces organ dysfunction and 28-day mortality in septic shock. The current study will examine the hypothesis that a CRT-targeted resuscitation based on hemodynamic phenotyping considering within an decision tree usual bedside clinical parameters such as pulse pressure, diastolic blood pressure, fluid responsiveness and cardiac performance can further decrease mortality in septic shock as compared to usual care.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Reims, 51092, France
Location status: Recruiting
Septic shock is associated with a high mortality risk related to progressive tissue hypoperfusion.However, despite extensive research on the best monitoring and resuscitation strategies, many uncertainties remain. Over-resuscitation, particularly when inducing fluid overload, might contribute to a worse outcome. Fluid overload more likely occurs when fluids are administered to fluid unresponsive patients, but also when inappropriate resuscitation goals are pursued, or a "one-size-fit all" strategy is followed. From a hemodynamic point of view, several pathogenic mechanisms determine a progressive circulatory dysfunction While loss of vascular tone and relative hypovolemia predominate in early phases, more complex mechanisms such as endothelial and microcirculatory dysfunction, progressive vasoplegia, and myocardial dysfunction may be involved later. In effect, from a clinical point of view, many patients despite been fluid loaded in pre-intensive care unit settings, are still evidently hypovolemic and benefit from further administration of fluid boluses. Others, however, present very low diastolic arterial pressures reflecting profound vasoplegia, and recent data suggest that these patients may benefit from early norepinephrine instead of fluids[; on the contrary, administering fluids may fail to correct vascular tone and increase the risk of fluid overload[2]. In addition, a recent echocardiography-based study confirms that a relevant myocardial dysfunction is present in a significant number of patients, and that several cardiovascular phenotypes with a potentially different therapeutic approach may be recognized[8]. Unfortunately, despite the availability of most of the parameters at the bedside and research efforts, no universally applicable clinical phenotyping method for septic shock patients has been translated to usual practice. This is particularly problematic since chocardiography is not immediately available in the majority of centers worldwide, and therefore initial decisions on fluid resuscitation are usually based on clinical grounds and tend to follow the one-size-fits-all principle, leading to the risk of fluid overload.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: 28 days
A hierarchical composite of all cause mortality within 28 days, time to cessation of vital support (truncated at 28 days) and length of hospital stay (truncated at 28 days).
Time frame: 28 days
All-cause mortality within 28 days
Time frame: 28 days
The number of calendar days between randomization and 28 days that the patient is alive and with no requirement of cardiovascular, respiratory and renal support. Patients who die within 28 days will have zero days counted for this variable, irrespective of vital support status.
Resolution of cardiovascular failure implies complete stopping of vasopressor support for at least 24 consecutive hours. Resolution of respiratory failure implies extubation / liberation from mechanical ventilation for at least 48 hours. Resolution of renal failure implies liberation of renal replacement therapy for at least 72 hours in those receiving continuous replacement modalities and at least 5 days for those receiving intermittent ones.
Time frame: 28 days
Number of days remaining hospitalized (from randomization up to hospital discharge), truncated at day 28.
Time frame: 28 days
Number of days remaining in ICU (from randomization up to ICU discharge). Re-admission to ICU during follow-up period will be accounted for the original ICU length of stay only if occurred within the next week of ICU discharge and by a cause related with the original admission.
Time frame: 28 days
The number of hours between randomization and complete stopping of vasopressor support (defined as its complete interruption for at least 24 consecutive hours), within 28 days from randomization
Time frame: 28 days
The number of calendar days between intubation / start of mechanical ventilation and extubation / liberation from mechanical ventilation (maintained for at least 48 hours) within 28 days from randomization.
Time frame: 28 days
The number of calendar days between start of renal replacement therapy and complete liberation from renal replacement therapy (at least 48 hours for continuous replacement modalities and 5 days for intermittent ones) within 28 days from randomization.
Time frame: 28 days
The number of calendar days without vasopressor support from randomization up to day 28. Cessation of vasopressor support implies its complete interruption for at least 24 consecutive hours.
Time frame: 28 days
The number of calendar days without mechanical ventilation support from randomization up to day 28. Cessation of mechanical ventilation support implies its complete interruption for at least 48 consecutive hours.
Re-start of mechanical ventilation during follow-up period will be accounted for the original mechanical ventilation-free days only if this occurs within the next week of ICU discharge and by a cause related with the original admission.
Time frame: 28 days
The number of calendar days without renal replacement therapy from randomization up to day 28. Cessation of renal replacement therapy implies its complete interruption for at least 72 hours in those receiving continuous replacement modalities and at least 5 days for those receiving intermittent ones.
Re-start of renal replacement therapy during follow-up period will be accounted for the original renal replacement-free days only if this occurs within the next week of ICU discharge and by a cause related with the original admission.
Time frame: 7 days
The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) is used to track a patient's status during the stay in the ICU to determine the extent of organ dysfunction. Its values ranges from 0 to 24. Higher SOFA scores associate with a worse outcome.
The SOFA score will be calculated upon the maximum values observed on the day of enrollment and then, at days 2, 3, 4, 5 and 7 (or until patient discharge or death, if this happened before day-7), using clinically available data. If an individual organ dysfunction value is not available (i.e., cardiovascular, respiratory, renal, etc.), it will be assumed to be zero unless previous value was abnormal (in which case it would be considered the same organ score). Neurological score under sedation/invasive mechanical ventilation will be computed as that observed just before sedation/intubation.
Time frame: 7 days
Renal function assessed according to "Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) staging system from randomization through day 7 to assess for "de novo" or "worsening" acute kidney injury. Patients under chronic renal replacement therapy will not meet this end-point
Time frame: 72 hours
The volume of fluids administered with resuscitative intention up to 72 hours from randomization.
Time frame: 72 hours
The volume of cumulated fluids during the first 72 hours from randomization.
Time frame: 72 hours
Evolvement of CRT within the first 72 hours after randomization.
Time frame: 72 hours
Evolvement of arterial lactate levels within the first 72 hours after randomization.
Time frame: 72 hours
Evolvement of Central venous pressure within the first 72 hours after randomization.
Time frame: 72 hours
Evolvement of central venous oxygen saturation within the first 72 hours after randomization
Time frame: 72 hours
Evolvement of central venous to arterial carbon dioxide difference within the first 72 hours after randomization.
Time frame: 90 days
All-cause mortality within 90 days
Time frame: 90 days
Number of days remaining hospitalized (from randomization up to hospital discharge), truncated at day 90.
Time frame: 72 hours
Assess the changes in CRT before and after fluid resuscitation or increase in norepinephrine doses and analyse their correlation with changes in haemodynamic parameters: systolic arterial pressure (SAP), diastolic arterial pressure (DAP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), pulse pressure (PP), cardiac output (CO) when available.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Other
Hemodynamic Phenotype-Based, Capillary Refill Time-Targeted Resuscitation In Early Septic Shock: The ANDROMEDA-SHOCK-2 Randomized Clinical Trial (A2)
Acronym: ANDROMEDA-FR
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05279547
Critical Illness, Disease Attributes
Leuven, Belgium
View Trial DetailsNCT04989790
Child, Confusion
Madera, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06700694
Intensive Care Unit Acquired Weakness
Taipei, Taiwan
View Trial DetailsNCT07191743
Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Acquired Weakness (ICU - AW), Intensive Care Unit Acquired Weakness
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
View Trial Details