HU Reina Sofia
Córdoba, Spain
NCT Number: NCT02240004
The aim of this study is to compare purification efficiency of HFR in terms of clearance of protein-bound toxins and the effects on markers of inflammation and endothelial damage, in comparison to HF-HD and OL-HDF.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Córdoba, Spain
Protein-bound uremic toxins are poorly removed by current dialysis techniques because of their size, which is larger than the pore size of dialysis membranes available in the market. These protein-bound uremic toxins have emerged as important risk factors for progression of CKD, as well as for cardiovascular disease. Several studies have demonstrated that protein-bound uremic toxins induce vascular inflammation, endothelial dysfunction and vascular calcification.
In dialysis patients, serum concentrations of p-cresyl sulphate and indoxyl sulphate are approximately 17 and 54 times higher, respectively, than in healthy subjects. Because these toxins are bound to proteins, only a 30% or less is removed efficiently by hemodialysis. Traditional renal replacement therapies depend upon diffusion and convection for solute clearances and the use of an adsorbent in combination with dialysis membranes may be a new therapeutic option to increase removal rate of these uremic protein-bound toxins.
HFR technique uses a dual dialyzer with a resin between chambers. The first chamber is a high-flux membrane where convective process takes place. The ultrafiltrate obtained from this first chamber passes through the cartridge and is reinfused before the second chamber, a low-flux membrane, where diffusive process is performed.
In HFR, adsorption and haemodiafiltration are attached, using ultrafiltrate as a replacement fluid and being capable of theoretically removing most medium and high molecular weight uremic toxins. A potential benefit has been regarded for toxicity, biocompatibility, tolerance, and preservation of essential elements such as albumin, vitamins, amino acids or growth factors. An improvement on oxidative stress has also been described in HFR.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
usual dialytic prescription for duration, frequency, acid buffer and anticoagulation regimen
Time frame: 12 weeks
Hospital Universitario Reina Sofia de Cordoba
Other Gov
Removal of Uremic Toxins and Improvement of Chronic Inflammation With HFR in Comparison With "On-Line" Hemodiafiltration and High Flux Hemodialysis.
Acronym: SUPREMO
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06993740
Anesthesia, Cardiovascular Diseases
Jakarta, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia
View Trial DetailsNCT01778569
Cardiovascular Disease, Cardiovascular Diseases
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01934660
Cardiovascular Disease, Cardiovascular Diseases
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05021835
Cardiovascular Risk, Chronic Disease
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial Details