Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital
Fuzhou, Fujian, China
NCT Number: NCT06573307
HMDLS, based on hematological markers, could effectively distinguish the long-term efficacy of AGC patients after NAT. The predictive performance of nomogram-HMDLS was better than ypTNM stage, achieving better prognostic stratification and tumor treatment response prediction.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeAll sexes
Observational
Fuzhou, Fujian, China
In this research, we incorporated a total of 320 patients from the Union Hospital of Fujian Medical University to form the training cohort (TC). Additionally, we included 122 patients from four distinct medical centers to serve as the external validation cohort (EVC). The Hematological Marker Dynamic Load (ΔHMDL) was determined using the following formula: ΔHMDL = (HMDL pre-surgery - HMDL pre-NAT) / HMDL pre-NAT, where HMDL represents the hematological marker levels before surgery and before the initiation of Neoadjuvant Therapy (NAT), respectively.
Employing LASSO regression analysis, we identified the most influential and statistically significant ΔHMDL indicators. These were then utilized to compute the Hematological Marker Dynamic Load Score (HMDLS), defined as: HMDLS = Σ(LASSO coefficient * ΔHMDL), where the summation encompasses the products of the LASSO-estimated coefficients and the corresponding ΔHMDL values.
Further, leveraging the outcomes of a multivariate COX regression analysis, we integrated clinical parameters with the HMDLS to formulate a predictive model, termed the Nomogram-HMDLS model. The efficacy of this model in terms of predictive accuracy, clinical utility, and calibration was meticulously assessed and confirmed through several metrics, including the concordance index (C-index), Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, decision curve analysis (DCA), and calibration curves.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: 3-year OS or 36 months
Overall survival, death, survival with tumor
Time frame: 3 years DFS or 36 months
Disease-free survival, death,recurrence
Time frame: 3 years or 36 months
a grade system evaluates the pathological response based on the degree of tumor tissue regression after NAT.
Chang-Ming Huang, Prof.
Other
To Develop a Prognostic Model for Predicting Survival and Treatment Response for Advanced Gastric Cancer Patients After Neoadjuvant Therapy by Analyzing Hematological Markers Dynamic Load
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06337266
Digestive System Diseases, Digestive System Neoplasms
Fuzhou, Fujian, China
View Trial DetailsNCT01896310
Atrophic Gastritis, Digestive System Diseases
Jinan, Shandong, China
View Trial DetailsNCT00183898
Digestive System Diseases, Digestive System Neoplasms
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00342654
Digestive System Diseases, Digestive System Neoplasms
Beijing, China
View Trial Details